LarrySR

He believed Trump. ???? 

Truth Social(TS) the most mismanaged technology company in history, launched in Feb 2021 ...has only been available on Apple devices. but.....Most of the MAGA people I know use Android. (I think they consider Apple Woke, no?)

Finally TS managed to develop their platform for Android use & launched on August 19 2022.

BUT......Truth Social app still not approved & available on Google Play Store due to insufficient content moderation. Google notified Truth Social of several violations of policy such as physical threats & inciting violence.

“When are we going to be available on Android?” Nunes said. “Well, look, that’s up to the Google Play Store. I mean, we’re waiting on them to approve us, and I don’t know what’s taking so long.”

6 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

Seems rather harsh for a non violent offense. He did not attack any police, nor did he threaten anyone, nor did he say/do anything to Senator Schumer.  

Give this nincompoop a few a more years for believing Trump.

LOL Seriously, if he had a brain, he'd take it out and play with it.

16 hours ago, Baron Samedi said:

I did. They suck.

I thought it was a hand job place. 

Peter Gunn Theme

Henry Mancini composition rendition by the BLUE BROTHERS BAND

3 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I commented earlier that surely the FBI, Pentagon and US security services are assuming the TS/SCI documents Trump stole and illegally stored at Mar-a-Largo were seen by US adversaries.

 

Well look who got through Mar-a-Largo ‘security’:

 

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/aug/27/fake-heiress-infiltrates-mar-a-lago-trump

Won’t be surprised when they release the Maralogo CCTV and see Putin disguised as the pool boy. 

21 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

And he still doesn’t know who’s grassing on him from the inside.

Well, he is still guarded by Secret Service so they might have tipped off the Feds. 

14 minutes ago, riclag said:

Why wait, Former  Supreme court law clerk speaks out on the Fbi mar-a-lago raid.

 

Fox?

You really watch that garbage?

Got a feeling the anti-technology people here are also strongly in the climate change denier camp. 

2 minutes ago, Sparktrader said:

Situation

 

Family with dog and small child left side of road

 

Old person with 2 dogs right side

 

How does a computer weight this info if it has to swerve to miss a person in the middle of the road and that person is handicapped?

 

 

Situation,

How does some agitated, undereducated, intoxicated, dumbarse listening to Hannity on the car radio decide?

3 minutes ago, Sparktrader said:

Do some research

 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/neilwinton/2022/02/27/computer-driven-autos-still-years-away-despite-massive-investment/

Good stuff.

Says 60% of cars sold in 2030 will have level 2 (able to control steering, acceleration and braking,) while still requiring drivers to remain engaged. 

5% will be sold with level 4. Sounds about right.

By 2045 all cars sold will have level 5 (fully automated) systems that take away the 95% cause of car accidents...human error.

How many of the 1.3 million yearly road deaths (1,235000 caused by human error) will be saved is to be determined.

2 hours ago, Sparktrader said:

How do you program common sense into a computer?

 

Its raining

A dog runs across from the left

A kid runs across from the right

Another car over takes you at 140kph

 

A car going 100kph in.opposite direction swerves onto your path and there is little room on the side of the road or a big tree and a building on right

 

What does the car do? Brake? Hit the tree? Swerve right into a building?

 

A good driver can make a decision to choose the best option. A computer has no idea what the best option is.

 

 

Quick!

You need to phone Tesla, Mercedes, VW, Volvo, Toyota, Ford, BMW and explain things.

5 minutes ago, Sparktrader said:

Yes I know. Detecting rain isnt the issue. Its the combination of issues 4,5,6,7 variables.

 

How do you weight those issues in importance?

 

Dog

Child

Rain

Pot hole

Tree

Building

Curve in road

Car on wrong side of road

 

You CANNOT WRITE A PROGRAM with CORRECT WEIGHTING OF RISKS FOR ALL VARIABLES.

 

Painfully obvious people need to think about it.

You're obviously way behind on reading up on technology. 

17 minutes ago, Sparktrader said:

1 there are no facts to support your claim

 

2 there is more money in it which is why they are being developed

 

3 at least do some research on the topic before making strong statements

National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA) found that human error accounts for 95% of all auto accidents, therefore self-driving cars that eliminate most accidents caused by human error and are safer than humans. Are you getting it now?

Humans get tired, drunk, stoned, text while driving, are easily distracted and let's be honest, a significant percentage of humans (dont take it personal) ....fall to the far left of the IQ curve chart.

Trump will spin it to make Trump the victim and then (let’s be nice here) “the undereducated” will believe him. 
 

Just now, Sparktrader said:

Those are partially useful. Not in total control.

 

They sometimes locked up and fail too.

 

At least do some research on the topic before commenting.

 

 

Doesn’t matter what your opinion is. 
Self driving cars are coming because they will be safer. 

52 minutes ago, seedy said:

Hogwash

Only education will have a significant impact.

As in ALL causes of death

https://ourworldindata.org/causes-of-death

HUH?

Wonder why the manufacturers/engineers have designed over 1,000 micro chips in every car?

Ever hear of:

anti lock brakes,

cruise control,

electronic stability control,

blind spot detection,

collision warning,

lane departure warning,

rear view video, automatic braking,

pedestrian emergency braking,

lane centering