NextG

You have a very obviously skewed view of the world. It’s not that unusual, but you need to understand that it is not universal. Please explain what you would do if you found out an adult male had groomed your son? Of course I don’t need you to reply to that question. It’s abuse, even without ‘beating or drugging’. People who should hold themselves to higher standards, taking advantage of the vulnerable. You don’t care, until it affects you. Nothing to do with men at all. Lots of abusive women out there. I also know of female teachers who were openly ‘perving’ over their students and also violent and violently abusive women. The ‘man hating’ is simply a figment of your imagination. Times change and we need to learn how to adapt. Probably you grew up in a time, wherein, much as in Thailand, the police would not involve themselves in a ‘domestic’. Obviously that has changed for various reasons and possibly some have found it hard to adapt. No one said that life was fair, but it’s up to you to try to maintain a good environment for you and yours. I’m pretty sure that you wouldn’t be sticking to your definition of abuse if your son were involved. The perpetrator would be taking a long sleep and you would pay your fine.

Your argument is nonsense. If Joe Public took his penis out to show a receptionist because she reprimanded him for the way he was ringing a bell, he would already be on a Sex Offenders list. So your nonsense about it being because of his views or because he is famous, is just that, nonsense. He got away with it because he brought good ratings due to his outrageous behaviour.

I don’t see ‘rape’ in the thread title, do you? It’s clear that you condone his behaviour, by your pretence of it being about his political views and also your continued deflection of any discussion of his behaviour towards women. There’s no point in my trying to have a balanced discussion with someone holding such an abhorrent view. I’ll leave you to it.

Innocent of what? Not one person has discussed any ‘criminal’ allegations. What we are discussing is his pattern of behaviour. Something you and your ilk are taking pains to avoid.

I posted a video and it was removed. It showed him discussing a visit to Asia with his father whilst still at school wherein they were utilising prostitutes. It aired part of him discussing with a guest about him exposing himself to a receptionist and dragging vulnerable women into toilet cubicles. You can search the title for yourself and then come back to discuss it.

Haven’t ever heard of him…

I accept your point…. But how about addressing his actual behaviour now? Note how I replied to your link to the Biden video; no excuses, no deflections. Whereas you don’t appear to be able to discuss his actual behaviour at all. So now you’ve made you point with regard to him being a public figure, how about we discuss his actual behaviour?

I think you meant to post that for JonnyF…

Nonsense. You are simply trying to deflect from his actions. What someone else did it totally unrelated. So I can punch you in the face and then say it’s okay because someone else punched someone else in the face? Brand is a big name because he is a big name. Biden is a big name too. Start your own thread if you want to discuss him or the ‘ex-BBC guy’.

I should add that I have nothing against Russell at all. It’s clear that he had/has some issues and I hope that he has grown out of them. But those who continually try to deflect any kind of serious discussion, do themselves and the discussion and the board, a disservice.

It was me who asked for evidence. But your posts are disingenuous nonsense AGAIN. You spend most of your time attempting to divide between ‘left’ and ‘right’ when this has NOTHING AT ALL to do with that. So how about we stick to the SUBJECT at hand. Which is Russell Brand’s behaviour. If you want to discuss Biden’s behaviour in a similar topic, start one. I’m not in disagreement over the behaviour, I just think your continually trying to frame everything as ‘left’ or ‘right’ is bordering on the obsessive. Let’s keep to the topic.

Whilst it’s quite obvious what is being shown in that video, this thread topic is Russell Brand. You can post your video for discussion in a Biden topic.

You can also find him on YouTube discussing his formative years on a video named RESURFACED VIDEO of RUSSELL BRAND & HIS DAD laughing about sleeping with PROSTITUTES in THAILAND The language might be too rich for sensitive ears. Elsewhere he mentions being abused by a male tutor when he was eight years old.

Seems this place has lost all credibility….

Perhaps your phone doesn’t accept anything other than Truemove H SIM….

Work in what way? Not finding a network at all? Prepaid? Postpaid? What package?

I have no idea what she told him. But didn’t ever ask me for money and paid for her translations and printing etc Whereas the ‘old man’ was obviously paying… As to since, I know what happened as I helped her to move on, knowing that I wasn’t ever going to going to allow myself to be with her. It wasn’t a old man with whom she moved on, but someone who had a bar on Soi 6 in Pattaya.

If you didn’t understand that ‘low level’ clearly meant that they have far less power to complain or to be believed, then we are obviously on completely different intellectual levels. Come back when you are able to discuss seriously without your ‘so very obvious’ attempts at deflection. The subject is Russell Brand.

Married… not exposing yourself on a first meeting or dragging them off to toilet cubicles.

Weirdo..creepy and disgusting.

Oh dear… attempting to attack me because you really have no argument of substance. The topic is Russell Brand and his behaviour, not my level of education or quality of upbringing. Are you suggesting that only knuckle-dragged can apply to comment on this thread? Not unlike Mr Fox who had to resort to commenting on a woman’s looks because he simply couldn’t match her on an intellectual level. Even more pathetic when we actually have the bigger brains.

and you are good at what?

It’s abuse. He exposed himself to receptionists, as opposed to his bosses. Get it?

I’m suggesting that exposing yourself and forcing yourself on women is unacceptable behaviour. Now it’s come back to bite him and he’s squealing like a pig.

Name calling doesn’t hide the abuse. Abuse is abuse. Taking advantage of the desperate, needy and vulnerable is despicable behaviour. He treated women like dogs because that’s what his father showed him. That all you needed to do was pay or to utilise your fame in order to coerce some women into an abusive environment. He even talks about it himself about how difficult it was to do with intelligent women. So it would be receptionists and low level workers on set etc