NextG

You said it for yourself ???? You preferred Thai prostitutes due to your lack of success with both western and Thai women. Your own words. But you have the temerity to describe the women with whom you had no success as ‘slutty’ or ‘demented’. Are you following what it is I’m saying…? You failed to grasp the subject and you blame everyone but yourself…

I don’t think the lack of an email address was the reason for your lack of success with women… and I think a man whose sex life consisted of mainly sleeping with prostitutes, should look in the mirror before calling normal girls who simply didn’t want to have sex with him, slutty.

HR person? A completely ‘retarded’ comment IMHO. What do you think an ‘HR person’ would be able to do to Russell Brand at the time? Another thing being pushed by the deniers on this board, quite apart from the MSM conspiracy theories, is the time factor. The assumption that no complaints were made at the time nor prior to this year. Google ‘Katherine Ryan’ in relation to Russell Brand. She ‘outed’ him in 2018 on the show “Roast Battles”. Her remarks about him were removed from the final cut of the show. There was also the mention of him having “good lawyers”….

Receptionist wasn’t a ‘groupie’. Nice try. If he tells the truth, we’ll support him if his intentions are good. Of course if he is willing to put his neck on the line in revealing some ‘truths’ that should be revealed, he should be supported. He did wrong. Everyone can make mistakes. I’m not referring to any allegation of rape, since I’m not privy to that information. But the continuing attempts to whitewash does him no favours.

It’s EXACTLY what you are doing ????

I say that you are covering up for a sex offender. This is a board where people express their opinions. There are no legal ramifications for RB. Therefore ‘innocent until proven guilty’ is not valid in this discussion. You continue to try to ignore the clear evidence of his actions, including an actual admission and instead lie in suggesting that ‘you would be the first to condemn him if found guilty’. Guilty of what? Indecent exposure? No one has prefaced the rape accusation here. So what is it that you are discussing. You are crawling so low here that it’s not possible to see any light underneath you. Give it up and crawl away…

I didn’t tell you to shut up… You had a choice. Put up OR shut up ????

You stated the accused stated one thing whilst the accused stated another. So provide the evidence that this has occurred. Actual evidence as opposed to “it’s obvious” ☺️ Your attempts to deflect and obfuscate only serve to illustrate your malfunctioning moral compass. What you are doing is choosing to ‘ignore’ the undoubtable ‘indecent exposure’, choosing to only focus on a possible accusation of ‘rape’. It’s disingenuous act and only highlights poor character.

Pathetic. Show me where you were insulted. You were simply requested to put up the evidence that backed up your claim that he has refuted her claim or to stop claiming that he did. Your wriggling is so clear and obvious to all concerned. You are doing everything you can to deflect from admitting that his actions in that instance amount to clear evidence of an ‘indecent exposure’, a sex offence. Following on from that, the question to ask yourself is, was it the only time he has behaved in that manner? So you carrying on denying for him. It’s clear to all and sundry.

So post the statements that show him refuting her claim.. Put up or shut up….

The ‘left’?! Are you suggesting that anyone who thinks that someone exposing himself to a unwilling lone woman and perhaps going further in telling her what he wants to do with her, as being offensive, is automatically ‘left wing’? Have you lost all sense of moral decency on the ‘right wing’ or do you feel it’s your ‘right’ to be able to grab women’s genitalia and expose yourself to any woman at will? What kind of sick people are you representing?

Your reply illustrates the result of your continuing obfuscation and deflection. WE are have this exchange because of that and not anything RB has or has not published or said. What you are doing is attempting to lump all of the allegations in one, which is a completely infantile approach in a discussion with no legal ramifications to the person in question. Of course he is referring to allegations of rape when he asserts that the contacts were consensual. But both you and I know that cannot be applied to what happened to the receptionist who simply opened the door to a corporate building. Are you suggesting that he has claimed that act was consensual? Your back-pedalling has not gone unnoticed… Again, you were hiding behind the law and supporting a sex offender.

Another AI blunder? What does this have to do with Thailand? The man is from Kerala in Southern India….

Since you assert the accused states one thing and the accuser states another, perhaps you can link to those statements. You must have an insight that no one else here has to a statement he has made specifically refuting her claim. I am writing specifically of the ‘indecent exposure’ documented here. You can wriggle as much as you like…

Real people, meaning people whom I know. Actual people, rather than Google…. It seems you assumed clients/tenants; you were incorrect in that assumption too.

Good that you decided to ???? instead of basing your ‘opinions’ on what you saw via Google, coupled your own ineptitude and discontent and then posting the results as a fait accompli. Even when I lived on the beach road, I would carry my shopping by hand where I could have easily jumped on a songthaew. Far longer than the distances that you seem to think are out of the question. You make yourself sound totally incapable and totally dependent on the service of others, whilst denouncing them as ‘simps’ for doing so….

Insisting that when he pulled his dick out on the receptionist that it was consensual? The issue here is the mixing of completely separate issues. I support independent media, but I don’t support whitewashing sex offences by calling them consensual. Some likely were and some likely weren’t.

So without all the pathetic deflection, do you agree that exposing yourself to an unwilling woman at her place of work(BBC offices) may be regarded as a sex offence? Forget all the whataboutery and try the truth.

You think Stringfellows can be used as a reference? That was the lowest of the low. Prostitution. Gold diggers, footballers…. It was just a front.

This is just one instance. Does it have to be rape for it to be a sex offence? What kind of low lives do we have inhabiting this board, that they cannot accept that exposing himself to a receptionist because she chided him for ringing the bell in a silly way is acceptable behaviour? The rape allegation is an altogether different accusation that isn’t being referenced here, because it is just that, an allegation. But the indecent exposure is a fait accompli. That intimidating behaviour at a place of work(BBC offices) is clearly a sex offence and anyone attempting to deflect away from this is clearly of very poor character.

What has what goes on in ‘pubs and clubs’ got to do with his indecent exposure to a receptionist in a building in which the BBC office resided? Have you list any sense of decency?

Refute that you dismissed his exposing himself to a lone female? What is it that you want me to refute? I say that is a sex offence and therefore he is a sex offender. I say that you condone that behaviour of a sex offender by trying to dismiss it as something “that happens in pubs and clubs all over the country on a Saturday night” whilst conveniently ignoring that it didn’t even happen in a pub or a club but twenty five minutes before he was interviewing a guest. So overall your assertions are the height of banal ignorance. That’s what I say. What say you?

An utterly banal and ignorant post…

If you are happy to ‘label’ others, accept that other may label you…

You couldn’t see the biggest market in Pattaya… You ‘chose’ to live in the centre and complain that you saw only ‘bikies’ nor could you make any friends. You complain that you cannot meet a decent woman. You complain about ‘simp’ service and that Thailand has ‘no edge’ but yet you cannot carry your groceries a few hundred metres ‘in the heat’, nor live a ‘normal’ life in preparing your own meals. You don’t sound a capable nor even remotely successful as a human being and therefore your opinions won’t be valid for even the ‘average’ person. Just an opinion of course. I don’t own anything there nor do I work in Thailand. We can all speculate. I don’t mind if you do, so I hope you don’t mind if I do too.