Jump to content

EveryG

Member
  • Posts

    182
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

EveryG's Achievements

Senior Member

Senior Member (5/14)

  • Dedicated Rare
  • Very Popular Rare
  • One Year In
  • 10 Posts
  • First Post

Recent Badges

446

Reputation

  1. It's easy to see that you are not actually interested in evidence, but the evidence was already presented at a trial, seen by a jury, and Trump lost. There is no point in relitigating a jury trial here because you are not interested in arriving at the facts, as the jury was instructed to do. That's why he's been ordered to pay $5 million for sexually assaulting E Jean Carroll. Trump's defense was proven completely false - laughably so. You sound like a child denying obvious facts such as Trump cannot claim to have never met E Jean Carroll (which is what Trump actually claimed) when a picture shows them together. Some people here do not comprehend rules of evidence and how that relates to findings of fact, much like they don't understand how statistics and probabilities relate to polls.
  2. And you can scream this until you are blue in the face, I never said he was. This is a literal strawman...oh wait, logical fallacies are like the MAGA SOP.
  3. Wrong. There was that picture of them together shown at the trial. You. Are. A. Clown. Ironically, as Trump was lying saying that he never met her during his deposition, Carroll's lawyer showed him this picture. When asked who that woman was, he said it was Marla Maples. So Trump blew his entire defense up because they proved he did know her and that he would have been attracted to her at least in the same manner he was his own wife. The jury saw the taped deposition of Trump getting caught lying.
  4. Again, your reading comprehension shocks me over and over. I was not accusing YOU of denying the fact of his convictions, but saying MAGAs will deny all of the evidence contained in those convictions. Same for all of the other examples. It's hard to tell if you are incapable or if you mind is just so twisted by ideology that you cannot read. Either way, no evidence will convince you that Trump committed sexual assault, that he committed criminal fraud, and that he committed fraud.
  5. I know what all of the evidence was, and it was much more than just her word. Most notably was Trump's deposition where he was caught lying twice...with photographic evidence. Oops. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._Jean_Carroll_v._Donald_J._Trump So given how easy it is to find the evidence against Trump, what you wrote below only proves that you are really bad at lying.
  6. The problem with MAGAs is there is no amount of evidence that would convince you. A jury found him liable for sexual assault, MAGAs deny. A jury found him guilty of 34 felonies, and MAGAs deny. A jury found the Trump companies guilty of fraud, MAGAs deny. His CFO went to prison for that fraud, MAGAs deny. Trump broke the law in Georgia and its on tape, MAGAs deny. Finally, Trump got caught on tape bragging about sexually assaulting women and MAGAs deny. So your appeal for evidence can only make me laugh.
  7. What you call reading between the lines is just making stuff up. It's what conspiracy theorist do with all of their nonsense. You are just trying to couch your tinfoil hat nonsense as intelligence
  8. You have zero credibility, lol. You said the jurors were rational people because they agreed with you on one count then switch things around as it suits you. Facts are still facts. The jury, which you first said was rational, did find Trump liable for sexual assault. Most states no longer have rape on the books in any way. The new term for rape is....wait, you guessed it! Sexual Assault. This is a forum, not a court room. By every definition of the word, which is what the judge was saying when he dismissed Trump's defamation case against E Jean Carroll, Trump is a rapist.
  9. The nature of a settlement is that it's not forced. You're just making stuff up here.
  10. Only in Trump world is the distinction between rape and sexual assault used to argue in favor of the perpetrator. Would you real feel vindicated if I just referred to your hero as a sexual assaulter? lol
  11. Wrong. 15 million for saying he was found liable for rape by a jury when he was found liable for sexual assault, but the latter still makes him a rapist. Judge says E Jean Carroll allegation Trump raped her is ‘substantially true’ in court dismissal People who rape are rapists.
  12. Oh no! What shall I do Your posts are on the same level of kids who watch professional wrestling and think it's real, so I'll keep reading so I can laugh.
  13. Trump was convicted of a felony, that's what makes him a convicted felon. You can argue technicalities all you want. If you prefer, we can say: Trump was found guilty of 34 felony counts. The Hawaii case is irrelevant, as these things are decided by state courts under state law. Trump lives in Florida, where he is considered a convicted felon. Period.
  14. This Rolling Stone cover nails it:
  15. It seems to me this would be more accurate.

×
×
  • Create New...