Red Phoenix

I deliberately wrote 'suppresses' the symptoms of Covid-19, not reducing it. World of difference...

All authorities (even the CDC) already for years now admit that covid-vaccination does NOT stop transmission of the virus. So, how are the 'non-vaccinated' endangering the vaccinated? It is actually the other way around, as the Covid-jab suppresses the symptoms of having caught Covid-19, the vaccinated that did catch Covid-19 are - at the start when they are most contagious - blissfully unaware of it and become super-spreaders. But it is true that the mere existence of those that refuse to take these dangerous, non-effective and totally unnecessary jabs, does threaten Big Pharma's vaccine cash-cow and the Jabs-are-necessary belief-system of the ignorant that Big Pharma has been promoting to sell their snake-oil (last 2 years they spend 2 Billion US $ on that misinformation campaign).

"The more boosters, the more likelihood of aggressive, explosive cancer" Professor Angus Dalgleish warns Big Pharma's push to use mRNA technology in childhood jabs would be "unmitigated disaster that would make the thalidomide disaster previously look very, very small" Source: https://uncut.substack.com/p/the-more-boosters-the-more-likelihood = = = PROFESSOR Angus Dalgleish says the world is facing an “unmitigated disaster” of “aggressive, explosive recurring cancers” as Big Pharma push to use mRNA technology in childhood vaccines. Professor Dalgleish was addressing the Port Hedland Council in Australia regarding DNA contamination in the Pfizer and Moderna Covid jabs – which is at least 145 times over the legal permissible limit. Such evidence has been detected not only in vials in Australia, but also in America by eminent genomics scientist Kevin McKernan. Professor Dalgleish also highlighted concerns about the lack of transparency from pharmaceutical companies and governments in addressing these issues. > “As unsettling as the information I will present may be. It is critical that we confront it now to prepare for the potential public health consequences. Link to the article featuring his crystal clear but alarming warning message here > https://uncut.substack.com/p/the-more-boosters-the-more-likelihood = = =

Things are finally moving it seems... Here a couple of countries/regions that are taking action to stop mRNA Covid-19 jabs: #1 - Florida > In December last year, Florida Surgeon General Dr Joseph A. Ladapo called for a halt to the Covid mod-RNA vaccine program over the DNA contamination issue, noting the risks of genomic integration and cancer formation. Dr Ladapo noted the lack of evidence for the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) claims that contaminant DNA poses no risk, and pointed to obfuscation on the part of the regulator about the presence of the SV40 enhancer sequence in the Pfizer DNA contamination, which scientists say increases the risk of the synthetic DNA entering the cell nucleus. #2 - Slovakia > The commissioner for a government investigation of the country’s Covid pandemic response, MP Peter Kotlar, has reportedly called for a total ban on the mod-RNA vaccines in his report to the government. #3 - EU - A bloc of parliamentarians from the European Union > They are lobbying to suspend the mod-RNA shots over safety concerns, including Christian Terhes (Romania), Christine Anderson (Austria), Ivan Vilibor Sincic (Croatia), Mislav Kolakusic (Croatia), and Francesca Donato (Italy). #4 - The Port Hedland Council in Western Australia > The council has joined a growing chorus of government officials and health experts calling for the mod-RNA shots to be stopped until the safety risks have been properly assessed. The Port Hedland Council is now liaising with CEO Carl Askew to ensure letters to local governments, health practitioners, and federal and state officials go out in a timely manner. More than 15 other local government councils indicated they will join the motion after it was passed in Port Hedland last week. And here some other international actions, some already dating from the early stages of the mRNA Covid-19 jab roll-out. # - In late 2021, countries including Germany, France, Finland, Iceland Sweden and Denmark halted use of the Moderna vaccine in young people due to concerns over cardiovascular risks. # - India did not approve either the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines because regulators did not agree to the companies’ requests for indemnity from liability in the event of adverse effects. # - A number of African nations refused the Covid vaccines altogether. “We are not yet satisfied that those vaccines have been clinically proven safe,” Tanzania Health Minister Dorothy Gwajima told the press in 2021.

Sadly, you are right that in many countries childhood vaccinations are mandatory. But such a mandate does NOT imply that these shots are safe, effective or even necessary. Do some research outside the Big Pharma captured channels and find out the shocking truth about the risk/benefit of these shots (for many of them studies have confirmed that it is all risk of harm and zero benefit). With the Covid-19 jabs (they are not vaccines but gene 'therapy') greedy Big Pharma has overplayed its hand with many people having experienced adverse effects to their own health or of their loved ones. Unfortunately it will need many million more harms and deaths before the truth - which was already obvious from the very start of the roll-out of the covid-19 jabs - cannot be hidden anymore and the dam of lies will breach...

This research study should raise deep-red flags for all the mRNA-vaccinated folks and those still considering getting these shots for themselves or their children...

You would be surprised - and shocked - when you did some actual research in the history of all these 'successful' vaccines. Vaccines are the poisoned golden eggs of the Big Pharma Goose. that are making billions on that business line, and with indeminity when things go awry! In the last 2 years Big Pharma spend 2 billion (yes billion) US $ to promote the so-called need for their covid-vaccines, and the medical establishment, universities, media and politicians have a vested interest in keeping the illusion of the need for vaccines alive...

This is a long and very technical article/study and I have no problem admitting that the technicality goes way beyond my knowledge. But the author - Anandamide, which I think is an alias for Kevin McKernan, who provided earlier bombshells on the covid-19 vax mechanism - does an admirable job of explaining his findings in layman's terms. And it is deeply concerning what he found. Here some quotes from that long technical article: #1 - Subtitle of the article already contains a shocker > Positive tumor biopsy qPCR one year after vaccination #2 - The vaccine is clearly making it into the cells or these mutations could not happen. When we sequence the naked vaccine alone as a control we see no variants. Once that vaccine is transfected into human cells variants emerge. #3 - This one is a nuke statement > If the DNA is replicating in mammalian cells, then we don’t need self amplifying mRNA vaccines as the population was already given them with Pfizer vaccines. Yes,, If the DNA is replicating in cells, it has profound implications regarding the DNA persistence in vaccinated patients. Source: https://anandamide.substack.com/p/sv40-origin-of-replication-in-mammalian

That's what they want you to believe...

This major study involves 1.7 million children but is not peer-reviewed yet, although it already dates from May 2024. But it features an interesting fact. The study found that heart damage only appeared in children who had received Covid mRNA vaccines. Not a single unvaccinated child in the group suffered from heart-related problems. In addition, the researchers note zero children from the entire group, vaccinated or unvaccinated, died from COVID-19. > https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.05.20.24306810v1.full.pdf

There is no need for that, as you can check the 6-digit booking-code on the website of the airline that issued the ticket.

Hahaha, a 'factual' claim with nothing, zero, zilch to back it up.

> What;s your point? That was exactly why the authors of that 'study' selected 2 large and distinctly different groups of people. Those who were hospitalized with COVID, and those that did not catch COVID in that 10 month period right before the vaccine roll-out. Then they followed up for 1000 days to 'prove' that a COVID-19 infection can result in long-term cardiovascular risks. But although the data was available, the authors did NOT take into account whether the people in both groups during that 1000 day follow-up were vaccinated. > I call this a trash study as the researchers are trying to gaslight us that the rise in cardiovascular harms is almost entirely due to having got a covid-infection earlier (like almost everybody did) without taking the effect of the covid-jabs in consideration.

Holly Folly! I was referring to the conclusions from this study. The authors state: Proportional hazard models were used to evaluate COVID-19 for association with long-term (>1000 days) risk of MACE and as a coronary artery disease risk equivalent. Yes, the selection of the 2 populations (those that were hospitalized with COVID, versus those that did not catch COVID) was done in the period just before the roll-out of the jabs. They used the unreliable PCR-test for that assertion, but ala... But then the authors use a model to look at long-term (> 2 years and 7 months) cardiovascular risks. And instead of "speculating that vaccines likely provide protection by preventing severe infections", why did they not take that possible factor of single/multiple COVID vaccination by both populations during the >1000 days period in consideration?

I just completed this quiz. My Score 40/100 My Time 95 seconds  

"The study did not examine the impact of Covid-19 vaccinations on cardiovascular risk, but Hazen speculated that vaccines likely provide protection by preventing severe infections." Yep, this says it all. They have all the data but did choose NOT to look at that factor. Anything but the vaccine... One can only guess why < sarcasm alert >. Trash study....

Prime Minister Robert Fico backed plans to investigate Slovakia’s pandemic management. A prominent anti-vaxxer was given the key role. October 4, 2024 2:26 pm CET By Ketrin Jochecová Slovakia's Health Minister Zuzana Dolinková announced Friday she is stepping down over government backing for a prominent anti-vaxxer and insufficient prioritization of health care. "I am sorry that at the level of the government coalition there is support for the ideas of the government proxy, which, in my opinion, find no scientific support," Dolinková said at a press conference, adding she will officially submit her resignation in the coming days. Peter Kotlár, the government envoy tasked with investigating Slovakia's pandemic management and one of the country's most prominent anti-vaxxers, presented his report — which is largely based on fringe theories — on Thursday. The report argues that the pandemic was "an act of bioterrorism" and a "fabricated operation." Shortly after his re-election last year, Prime Minister Robert Fico backed the initiative by the far-right Slovak National Party (SNS), one of the coalition members, to create a commission investigating pandemic measures. "The Slovak public simply needs an answer about the vaccination ... why people were vaccinated with various experimental vaccines without any tests, why all sorts of drugs were pushed into people ... and what actually happened during Covid," said Fico, who was critical about masks and vaccines during the pandemic. Kotlár, who hails from the SNS, was named to his envoy position in January. In his report, Kotlár recommended the government stop vaccination with mRNA vaccines and refuse to sign the global pandemic treaty, as well as the updated World Health Organization regulations. Slovakia's health ministry has not specifically commented on the report, but said Thursday in a statement — read aloud in the parliament — that it always "relies on scientific facts and knowledge." . . . Source: https://www.politico.eu/article/slovakia-health-minister-zuzana-dolinkova-quits-government-support-anti-vaccine-covid/

Science is never 'settled' and progress thrives on healthy debate, not on dismissing studies based on factual data as misinformation because it doesn't align with the currently hold beliefs.

The Swedish guy is already living 3 years in Thailand without a Thai bank-account. He could of course withdraw funds from an ATM using his foreign debit or credit-card. Or send money to himself using Western Union or similar service. But obviously those are not the most economical ways of getting money, so I suggested to him that he opened a Thai bank-account. Having a valid Non Imm O extension that shouldn't be too difficult for him.

My immediate reaction on the above < getting a 1-year extension based on your original Non Imm O Visa WITHOUT having a Thai bank-account > was that that is not possible. But it seems that it IS possible at some Thai Immigration Offices. And here is the case: Today I met somebody who was already staying 3 years in Thailand on 1-year extensions based on his original Non Imm O Visa who does NOT have a Thai bank-account. And he was not bvllsh1tting me, as he showed me his Passport with the approved 1-year extensions for his Non Imm O Visa based on marriage. Here some background: 3 years ago this Swedish guy applied for a 90-day Non Imm O Visa for reason of marriage at the Thai Embassy in Sweden, which was granted. He then moved to Thailand and at the end of the 90-days of that Non Imm O Visa he applied for the 1-year extension. He did - and still does - NOT have a Thai bank-account, but he uses the income-method and provides the Imm Office with the pension-statement from his Swedish pension-provider that he receives monthly an amount in excess of 40.000 THB as pension income. He has that document officially translated in Thai and stamped by the Swedish Embassy in Bangkok. And that document is accepted by his local Immigration Office as proof of income with no need of showing transfers to a personal Thai bank-account. Obviously a large number of Imm Offices would NOT accept the above, and would want him to show proof of having made monthly transfers of +40.000,- THB to his personal Thai bank-account. But indeed that's a local Imm Office interpretation, and HIS local Imm Office does not require it, as it is not in the official regulations that you need to transfer the pension-income funds to a personal Thai bank-account in order to be eligible for the 1-year extension. So instead of going through the hassle of having your pension-income transferred to your Thai bank-account, and getting hold of the Bank-account statement and Bank-transfers of monthly income, it would be worthwhile to check with your local Imm Office if they actually need the Bank-documents or whether an Embassy stamped document of your home-country's pension-provider would be accepted for meeting the financial requirement.

I just completed this quiz. My Score 70/100 My Time 99 seconds  

I just completed this quiz. My Score 100/100 My Time 59 seconds  

Nope, they are saying: something altogether different: In this study, we estimated that 0.60% (95%CI, 0%–2.71%) of the study population showed clear evidence of a prior infection with SARS-CoV-2. And that was between May 17 and June 19, 2020!

The implications of this 15 March 2021 published study, which did not get the attention it deserved at the moment it was issued, are throwing cold water on the whole COVID narrative. Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33720905/#:~:text=Using an orthogonal antibody testing approach, we estimated that about and full study here > https://insight.jci.org/articles/view/146316 ... we estimated that about 0.6% of nontriaged adults from the greater Vancouver, Canada, area between May 17 and June 19, 2020, showed clear evidence of a prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, after adjusting for false-positive and false-negative test results. Using a highly sensitive multiplex assay and positive/negative thresholds established in infants in whom maternal antibodies have waned, we determined that more than 90% of uninfected adults showed antibody reactivity against the spike protein, receptor-binding domain (RBD), N-terminal domain (NTD), or the nucleocapsid (N) protein from SARS-CoV-2. ... We conclude that most adults display preexisting antibody cross-reactivity against SARS-CoV-2... = = =

When you have a Yahoo e-mail address (it's free), you can on their Finance page create one or more accounts, that will track in real time the status of all the stocks in your portfolio.