Cameroni

She is a liar. She posted on her social media with her criminal boyfriend. She knew she was smuggling drugs. Torture extremely unlikely.

Well, as my constitutional law professor said : "If we knew what the law is, we wouldn't need lawyers to explain it to us". So obviously the judges don't have total discretion because they have to follow the law, but clearly they have ability to interpet the law in a way they think is the most just.

He was very lucky. There are many cases where excessive force resulted in serious convictions and self-defence was rejected. Even when burglars intruded in a home there's a case where someone shot them and was then handed a murder conviction for excessive force.

For RICO trials conducted by the Federal government. This was a federal trial which Coombs won, against the government. It was not a state case. "Statistics show that, in 2018-2022, federal prosecutors won convictions in more than 97% of the cases in which RICO was the most serious charge filed." https://abcnews.go.com/US/rico-act-sean-combs-charged-violating/story?id=122457863 So Coombs had a 3% chance of winning and still refused to plea-bargain. This is what you call balls of steel.

This is the first issue. If you embark on a very physical exercise program, and I do mean an intense one, where you ensure your body is physically tired, you will amost certainly sleep a lot better. In addition you can use CBD oil, which helps with sleep for many people.

He didn't "get away" with racketeering conspiracy. He was never engaged in racketeering, nor was there a conspiracy. That was plain to see from the beginning. That's why I empahtically stated at the beginning that it was clear there was no "racketeering". Given that the Feds have a 97% win rate in these cases and it is unheard for a defendant to beat the Federal government, the magnitude of Coombs' win is hard to overstate. It also goes to show how very poor the case of the Feds really was. This case was full of lies. For instance Cassie Ventura tried to leave the freak off because she had a film premiere the next day and wanted to look presentable, she was not trying to "escape" a freak off when she was assualted in the lobby. She actually enjoyed the freak-offs. The federal prosecutors got it badly wrong when they tried to pin racketeering charges on Coombs. He was never charged with domestic assasult, so the lobby attack was not punished at all. Now it's up to the judge as he'll decide sentencing on the two trafficking for prostitution charges. Those too are trumped up really, as Coombs did not traffic Ventura or anyone else for prostitution, but engaged in conensual sex parties. But anyway, the judge could give him anything from probation to 20 years. In reality most likely Coombs will get anything from 2 to 8 years I suspect, depending on how the judge sees it. Either way Coombs made the right call not to take the plea-bargain. Which was not easy to do, given that the Feds have a 95% win rate in these cases and unlimited resources.

Well, if you look at the beginning of the video and focus on the Swede's left arm you'll see a pushing motion of the left arm, which goes towards the girl. Then he retracts the arm quicky. The timing and the force of the arm movement correspond exactly with the timing and force of the girl's fall. No doubt the judge would find the girl was pushed violently to the ground by the Swede.

Once again. Proven right. It's really hard to be right all the time, so consistently.

No, Richard got it badly wrong. As did you obviously. The Swede clearly pushed her to the ground.

That's not the case actually. Yes, there were always some women who were outright prostitutes. About 10 percent of women, if you take the figure for prostitutes active in any country. But most women, though of course pursuing a transactional agenda, were nonetheless hiding this. They were not openly acting like whores. Now, one look at Instagram, TF or Facebook and it's clear that the number of women who have lost all shame in pursuing a whore strategy has increased massively. It has really become mainstream and all pervasive.

No the biggest issue would be that she has no loyalty. Except to herself and to how much she can make. If anyone hooks up with that girl he'll pay the price in more ways than one.

Not with us. She doesn't speak English.

I Have a Dream, a song to sing To help me cope, with anything I wanna sell m'vagina, t''is no fairy tale Only costs a million, m'vagina is for sale I believe in Dollars Expensive gifts for everything I do I believe in Dollars Now I know the time is right for me I'll sell m'vagina, I Have a Dream I Have a Dream, a fantasy To help me through, reality Pay for my vagina, make it worth my while Only a million baht, and you'll see my loyal smile

It was in hiding before though, covered by pretend love and they didnt' dare to say outright they want a 1 million baht a month for sex. Now there's no shame about it. It's outright shameless prostitute game. Schoolgirls are adopting it. It's becoming mainstream to be a prostitute.

Well the face is a 6, the body is 8 or 9, but that's hardly the point. The point is that this shows that the prostitution mindset has penetrated to the school girl level. To normal dating. This girl probably doesn't see herself as a prostitute, but as a modern, confident woman, aware of her worth. Prostitution has entered the mainstream. I am not joking. I've lost count of the TF profiles I see where they say "no stingy man" "need man to support" "want sugar daddy"....this has really taken off . Women have adopted the prostitute mindset and are not ashamed about it.

I sold my virginity for £1.6MILLION when I was at uni to a Hollywood actor who visited Jeffrey Epstein's paedophile island... but I don't regret anything - now I'm rich and famous Laura, 22, from Manchester, is one of an increasing number of young women who have sold their virginity on escort sites for large sums of cash. And although she found out the man who bid the most for taking her virginity was a Hollywood actor who had visited Jeffrey Epstein's paedophile island, Laura still slept with him. She now hopes to become a sugar baby and demands interested men pay her £30,000-a-month for the pleasure of her company. The youngster first decided to sell her virginity in December 2023, which is when she submitted an application to escort site Cinderella Escorts. Laura was then invited to events to meet potential buyers before eventually 'taking it a step further' just months later. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14463503/Sold-virginity-MILLION-uni-Hollywood-actor-rich-famous.html

Yes, indeed, whilst we all pay, including the liars who claim they don't, of course when we see someone so obviously increase pricing to such ludicrous levels for no justifiable reason, we find that repulsive. However, it's even more repulsive to think that this girl would have sex with a repulsive looking man, if only she gets paid well and a watch. She has a clear prostitution mindset.

You have to appreciate the thinking behind this plan, this young, attractive girl is prepared to take ANY man, no matter what the looks, fat, Chinese, Indian, English, Nigerian, very old, including 70 or 80 years old, and would engae in sexual intimacy with them, provided she gets 1 million baht and a rolex. Does it get more repulsive?

This girl is doing the equivalent of a man standing on a street corner shouting "I want a girl who gives 2 hour blowjobs, does anal, golden showers, gangbangs, does lesbian sex and enjoys whippings....don't ask why, the girl who agrees will know..."

The right way to deal with gold diggers like her:

Like beauty without substance, like a beautiful Christmas card sent from a western country to a poor child, like sleet glittering on the lambs’ backs.

It's not that I feel "threatened", why would I? It's more that this is bringing prostitution mainstream, into the sexual market place, which of course has now become so distorted in favour of women, due to social media, that they think it is justifiable to ask for a million Baht a month. Other girls have auctioned their virginity in global auctions for 1 million dollars. What we need is women that are loyal, honest, and willing to see you through the bad times, when times get rough, financially too. Women, who have your back, whom you can rely on. These mercenary pieces of <deleted>t would sell you for a handful dollars, but worse than that, they are making the dynamics between men and women even more mercenary than they are already.

Why should she get 1 million baht a month? She's worthless apart from her looks? What if all women only have sex for a milion Baht a month? If your mother or sister do it, you'd be okay with it? Nothing wrong with women distorting the sexual market place in this way? I beg to differ.

No, she's not mocking "modern dating culture". This is a real thing. Young women are auctioning off their virginity and thirsty idiots with more money than sense are paying 1 million USD plus. She's one of these. There's websites dedicated to this shiz.

The article that broke this piece of delightful news; https://www.dailynews.co.th/news/4871452/ One commenter: "I'm almost done paying the rice cooker, I'll be in touch".