Nick Carter icp

There's a huge difference , You can move away from the burning building , you cannot move away from an earthquake

Because Palestinians do not accept Israel's right to exist and they want all the land for themselves and they will either get that or die trying Palestinians , they fight all the time with everyone Nope, there is no chance that Palestinians will accept Israel right to exist Palestinians because of Oct 7 th Israelis cannot be expected to live anywhere near them due to the possibility of it happening again

The crane moving around forcefully , the crane was moving with some power . The crane seems to have weakened the whole precast side of the building and it caused the bottom pillars to collapse and then the whole building came down

They cannot live together peacefully . The only way to have a peaceful future is for one of them to leave . They would just begrudging live together for a few years then there would be another war . For a peaceful future, one of them needs to leave

So you are telling the Government to go and tell the people where to stand during an Earthquake ? Don't you worry about it, its not your problem

People already know how to evacuate buildings , they don't need the Government to tell them how to do it

You was talking about evacuating Bangkok . My reply was that it wasn't necessary to evacuate Bangkok . Evacuating buildings is a different subject

There was no need for an evacuation . You cannot get away from Earthquakes by jumping on a bus . There was no need for the people to go anywhere . No need for an evacuation

It was just a minor earthquake

That is a cunning plan . Remove the Israel sympathetic USA from the table and replace them with the Hamas sympathetic U,N Israel to concede the upper hand and hand everything to an enemy Nice try, but NOPE , it ain't going to happen

Why would a Judge need to decide ? The University expels them , they are no longer students , so revoke their students visas

Do you know what the rules are ?

I used to have a room there in that building , was even thinking of buying some rooms there

"A state may not forbid speech advocating the use of force or unlawful conduct unless this advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action." They did participate in lawless action , so, bang to rights

This isn't about freedom of speech .

Nope, encouraging violence isn't allowed under freedom of speech

Its non stop back and forth and getting nowhere .. Freedom of speech . This isn't about freedom of speech But their Freedom of speech is protected . This isn't about freedom of speech They cannot be deported for freedom of speech This isn't about freedom of speech . They have freedom of speech same as USA citizens This isn't about freedom of speech . Im done . you beat me into submission

There anti semitic behaviour was harassing Jewish students , American Jewish students . Singling them out for abuse because of their Religious beliefs . They were Americans , they weren't Isrealis whom they targeted . They were invited into the Uni lessons to speak about their opinion, but they refused the offer

Do they need to be charged to have their visas revoked ?

Free speech doesn't give them the right to harass other students and to trespass on private property and to cause criminal damage

I have stuck to the topic

How the building was made and by whom https://news.goalfore.cn/topstories/detail/63177.html?fbclid=IwY2xjawJTeKdleHRuA2FlbQIxMAABHagtsVoLRD18AYEo0tZFqpzCk31TelrmIWJPSBjTYrCqiC20vv8hjAv5qw_aem_-ZBg9cv8tf1GfMSVMWtyVg

The topic is "US Revokes 300 Student Visas in Crackdown on Campus Protests" , the topic isn't about Capitol hill 2020

Stick to the subject and not whataboutery

She was in Phuket for a conference and shes on her way back to BKK and she made a statement here https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/general/2989914/thai-pm-calls-for-calm-aftershock-alerts-in-place