Somjot

This one did not happen too? This is not sick? This you defend? Seriously, where did you learn the ability to just filter anything you don`t want to be true out of your reality and only see what you want to see?

And still not showing their faces. I wonder why, especially after they won then case.

Wasn`t that clear in the context? Us = Nato and the West. Another try to blameshift? "Oh, the Muslim countries allowed Israel to commit genocide so they are equally guilty." Nice try. As if they were ever asked for permission. As if they could have done anything against it. No, sir. WE not only allowed it. WE supported it. WE send the weapons which slaughtered children WE paid for it. WE justified it. WE have forever lost or credibility. OUR hands are stained with the blood of Ten thousands of children.

Child terrorist? Wow! Any proof for those Molotov cocktails? All I see is 2 boys, one of them being interested in fashion brand names, something considered sinful in Islam Let`s look at a few more of those monsters: 13-year-old Rimas Amouri was killed during an Israeli raid while she was standing in the courtyard of their home, in Jenin 12-year-old , Ayman al-Heimouni, was shot outside his grandfather’s home in Hebron. 10-year-old son, Saddam Rajab, who was killed by Israeli fire in the city of Tulkarem. 2-year-old Layla al-Khatib, shot in Jenin while perched on her mother’s lap; Amer, 14, a US citizen from New Jersey who was shot while picking almonds; 2-year-old Layla was with no doubt a hateful terrorist shooting at the brave soldiers from her mother`s lap using her as a human shield, but finally "Lethal Layla" got what she deserved, right?

Why didn`t Panama, Paraguay, Portugal, Poland, Peru, Pakistan and the Philippines do anything to help Palestine? They have something in common too. Your question originates from your brainwashed misbelief, that all Muslims are evil like the devil and as we all know “the devil takes care of his own” so consequently Muslim countries are supposed to support each other to spread more terror and misery over the good doing countries aka Christian and Jewish. Which is how simple-minded people prefer to see the world as it requires less intelligence and knowledge: We are the good, even if we do bad. They are bad even if they do nothing wrong. If they do something bad, we can do bad things to them as many times as we want and remain good. However, answering your question is not easy as there are many reasons. @JimCM mentioned a few already. Some of those countries are ruled by powerful people and they are too smart to attack Israel, because Israel won twice already, after its creation and after it attacked neighboring countries in the six-day war and later illegally occupied parts of their land. Besides Israel is a nuclear power and is supported by nuclear powers like the US and everybody remembers very well how it ended for Iraq just because of weapons of mass destruction everybody knew they didn't have so they can very well imagine how it will end for them. Some again are very close non-NATO allies like Bahrain, Egypt, Jordan, Kuwait, Morocco, and Qatar: These countries are designated as Major Non-NATO allies, signifying a close relationship. United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia are key U.S. partners in the Persian Gulf region, with relationships rooted in security and economic cooperation. Understandably none of these countries wants to ruin their relationships with us. Astonishingly we cherish our friendship with them despite them according to our definition somehow being bad guys with their Sharia law and their treatment of women and many other things but oil despite being black obviously can whitewash many things. Another reason why they did not help could be because Gaza was attacked by the closest ally to the West, Israel, and they somehow knew how Israel will react, as Israel always does: with maximum brutality and disregard of human life. Maybe they just wanted to know how much our western values, laws and morals, which we like to preach and rub their nose in at each and every occasion are worth, when one of our allies violates them. Remember the last Soccer world championship? When the German team was wearing T-shirts with "Human rights" on it or protesting against the lack of free speech in Qatar? Where are they now, when kids are burned alive or shot in Gaza? Where??? Hiding in their lockers in total silence not daring to say a single word as it may affect their "careers", same as all those movie stars and musicians, who always have an opinion about everything. Where are all those woke feminists when Gazan women are raped and killed? What a bad joke. What a disgusting double standard. Well, I guess they got their answer. And so did the world.

I am afraid once again I have to burst your bubbles. Most US Americans do not support Israel anymore which is a first. I have travelled the world and met countless people with different histories, mentalities and cultures. Some US Americans can be - no offence to any US American intended - a bit naive about how they see the world as they tend to simplify things while the truth might be more complicated. Or maybe that is just me, the constantly overthinking European. However, all US Americans I met in my lifetime had one thing in common: A very strong sense of justice and fairness and the belief that any person who harmed others especially weaker ones with no justifiable reason must face the consequences. And they don`t like to be fooled. Once they realize that most of their politicians in leading positions are bribed by a foreign country, there will be questions followed by consequences If you count becoming famous for children slaughtering, journalist and medic executing and mass murder, yeah, big time. On the world`s popularity list they are somewhere between Taliban and IS now. Wrong again. Jews are facing a huge increase of anti-Semitism worldwide now. Really, how come they are still there and growing in numbers. Thank you, Israel, the world has become such a safe place now. Their numbers are exploding. What loss? Indeed I did. I lost my faith in the western World and it`s justice. I learned that a deed being considered bad or evil does not depend on the deed itself or it`s nature, it depends on who carried out that deed. I thought rape or the intentional murder of innocent children were, are and always will be considered as heinous crimes and must be condemned. Turns out, I was wrong. Turns out obvious crimes are considered crimes except Israel commits them. Then it is self - defense. Even when crystal-clear that it is not. Then it must be supported or at least kept silence about. Tragic is the word I`d choose. Ironic in some sense. Fate has a sarcastic sense of humor. Once the murder of countless Jews played an important role in the creation of international human rights. 75 years later the countless murder committed by Israel played an important role in the destruction of those rights.

Err, if you don`t want to listen to a soft handed liberal like me, and why do you ask me a question? What has your question to do with Israel`s lack of humanity which I wrote, you quoted and then asked that question. Blame shifting? Instead of criticizing Israel, the country you are supporting, for all the atrocities it committed in the last 2 years you condemn other Muslim countries for not helping the Gazans. What a magnificent sense of justice.

And so does every human being with a heart and a moral compass.

Interestingly before the Jewish masses moved to Palestine and founded terrorist groups like Irgun and Hagana, which later merged into the IDF (explains a lot) and started terrorizing the indigenous people ( and later those who brought them to Palestine (King David Bombing or the USS Liberty) Arabs and Jews were living next to each other more or less peacefully. And nobody wanted to annihilate anybody. And there was no Hamas too. Nobody is supporting the terror attacks of October 7. Who in his right mind would ever support terror and mass slaughter and destruction of a state and annihilation? Who? Oh, you. Not really surprising. Let me correct that for you ... violating countless international laws, repeatedly lying to the world, committing war crimes and crimes against humanity, illegally stealing land killing or displacing the legal owners, attacking one neighboring country after the other, starving people and then shooting them when they stand in line for food, using kids for target practice, raping detainees and defending it in their government, having world records in killing medics, journalists and UN workers and the number of child amputees and so many other atrocities. That election was 20 years ago. The average age in Gaza is 17. Who voted for Hamas again? The residents of Gaza do not suffer because of the lack of fortune. They suffer because of the lack of humanity in those you support. By the way, you just admitted collective punishment, another war crime to be added to the list.

Where did he say "removed"? Where? Show me. When did he say deported? Show me? And you will apologize for not being able to find the passages about removing and deporting? You should not accuse others for telling the gist of something when you are not even doing that but just making things up. That meets the definition of a liar much more Let me get this straight. Israel is violating countless international laws, is repeatedly lying to the world, is committing war crimes and crimes against humanity, is illegally stealing land killing or displacing the legal owners, is attacking one neighboring country after the other, is starving people and then shooting them when they stand in line for food, is using kids for target practice, is raping detainees and defending it in their government, has world records in killing medics, journalists and UN workers and the number of child amputees and so many other atrocities. Despite all that you are still siding and supporting Israel. @JBChiangRai tells us about comments made by some Israeli politician using his own words, which were accurate enough to me and obviously to all those who commented on that video clip and all you can accuse him of, is that he quoted that guy wrongly. He said "This aid is supposed to be for the children of Gaza. Every child, every baby in Gaza is an enemy. The enemy is not Hamas. ..... Every child in Gaza is the enemy. Now every child of this kind to whom you giving milk now in 15 years will rape your daughters and slaughter your sons. We need to conquer Gaza and colonize it and not leave a single child there. There is no other victory." He supported the blockade of aid supplies getting into Gaza and justified that by saying, this aid is for the children. And all the children and babies are enemies, Who will one day rape and kill Israelis. You can see the videos of the aid trucks in the right half of the screen so this is clearly what he was talking about. So it is clear that he wanted those kids to be killed by food deprivation as stopping the supplies and food will lead to the children's starving and sooner or later dying. Not a single word about deportation. On one hand side you're getting so excited if another member is not reporting word by word and on the other hand side you have no problem to completely make things up. Not that it surprises me.

Once again your state of denial is alarming. Here you have some context: After Israel unilaterally ended the ceasefire agreement with Hamas in early March, it blocked humanitarian aid, including food and medical supplies, from entering the besieged enclave. According to the UN-backed Integrated Food Security Phase Classification, one in five Palestinians in Gaza faces starvation, and nearly 71,000 children under five are at risk of acute malnutrition. He was asked about that and answered as you can clearly read: "This aid is supposed to be for the children in Gaza. Every child every baby in Gazan is an enemy. Every child of this kind to whom you’re giving milk now - in 15 years will rape your daughters and slaughter your sons,” His comment was clearly to justify the blocking of food and medical supplies to cause starvation especially with the children, calling them enemies. Babies need food every 4 to 5 hours. If you deprive a baby of food, it will die within 3 to 5 days. He did not mention any deportation nor did he mean it. If you intend to deport people, why starve them? Even more if we talk about babies. Besides, deportation does not turn an enemy into a friend and does not guarantee your sons and daughter not being raped and killed by that enemy. His intentions were more than clear. If you read the comments, everybody understood. Not you. Well, we all know you did. You just try to whitewash. As usual. Buddy, the IDF is intentionally targeting kids, even using them for target practice. You come over like a cowboy chasing pigs with a lasso in your right hand and lipstick in your left. I hope you get the joke and have a sense of humor. No insult intended here. And the cowboy is really handsome. Feel free to use it as your avatar. And try to oversee his third hand. When Jews realized the negative sentiment against them in the early days of Nazi Germany some changed their names hoping to sound more German. The Nazis noticed that and first gave them names of colors like Gelb or Grün meaning yellow and green. Later they gave them insulting names like Beutelschneider meaning cutpurse. I am just guessing that he got his name from Nazis but in his case they chose well: Feigling means coward or wuss. That he got rid of the last consonant "g" does not change it a bit.

How have they been identified as terrorists. Does Israel have name lists, just like the one they presented after the siege of the hospital? Which clearly showed terrorist names : Monday, Tuesday, ... Or is crossing a line in a completely destroyed environment enough to be called a terrorist If so than a new word must be invented to describe the state terror of Israel. And you justify that. Who are you people? Then why the need for attacks in this dimensions? For the fun of it.

Sorry, but you are just performing the usual mind gymnastics here to strip the Palestinians or - if you like this description more - "those who have lived in the area of Palestine for centuries before a bunch of Europeans suddenly remembered their history and some divine promise from 3000 years ago, reinvented the ancient language, they had mostly forgotten and moved in forcibly removing the indigenous people" - from their right to that land. And you do that by describing then as a mere political identity, which they clearly are or maybe became as before foreigners started stealing their land that was not necessary. You name true facts and then use them to prove a wrong conclusion. True and true but lead to the wrong conclusion that Palestinians do not have the right or at least not more than an Jew to live in that area. Sure, not the fact of being an Arab Muslim gives them the right to that land but the fact that they have been living there for many centuries and generations, despite being Arab Muslims under Ottoman rule but no one ever questioned their ownership to that land. Violently moving into that land and brutally removing those who have been the owners does definitely not give one the right to that land no matter how much one might want to justify that with some ancient promise of one`s sky daddy or that one`s ancestors have been ruling there about 3000 years ago for only 300 years. Nope. Until around 100 years ago Jews were around 3 to 5 % of the population while the huge majority has been Arab Muslims and that for centuries. And they did not suddenly immigrate from surrounding countries (why should they when Britons ruled that place) but they were displaced by Jews. Then the Ashkenazi Jews came in in masses and are still the majority compared to Sephardi or Mizrahi (but not if one conveniently combines the 2 latter groups). Being a descendant of whatever group does not give you any right to live anywhere. Somehow you seem to forget your point about the Christians and Europe. So basically, you are saying if I come with a group of armed young men to your house and kick you out then your land belongs to me right? I'd love to see your face if something like that would ever happen to you but it won't because there are laws protecting you. That surely was the mentality of conquerors, but you might have missed that there have been world wars since then, especially after the second one international laws have been created which say exactly the opposite. They say that the land belongs to the indigenous people who have been owning it and living there for generations. There is no doubt that Jews have been the indigenous people of some part of the levant but somehow, they left which automatically leads to other people becoming the indigenous people. The laws also state that if land is occupied, as soon as the occupiers leave it will automatically belong to the indigenous people again. This has been exercised many times when western colonial powers pulled back. Not so in Israel. When the Britons left their colony, pardon me, their mandate the UN separated the land and gave a part to the indigenous people and another part to those who had violently moved in during the last 30 years and who were therefore clearly not the indigenous people, no matter what they tell us about 3000 years ago. Well, let's forget for a second why you would possibly think that I could have any means to tell anything to Hamas or maybe that is originating from this other Zio debate strategy where whenever anybody would criticize Israel the reaction would be “so you are for Hamas. You support terrorists” as if there were only two choices and there was no way that a person could just be worried about the Palestinian population. This strategy somehow puts Hamas and the Palestinian population into one pigeonhole with the old argument that Hamas is the elected government of Gaza and therefore anything happening to Gazans they brought on themselves and as a side effect is supposed to prove that anybody criticizing any harm done to Gazans must be a terrorist supporter. Which is wrong and ridiculous, on so many levels I don't know where to start to but it definitely proves that the person making that argument knows he is wrong and is not interested in any kind of fair debate but just tries to justify the unjustifiable. Just to name a few: 1. since when can individuals be accused and punished for what their government has done (If so US or UK citizens should not leave their country) 2. Hamas was elected 20 years ago and there have been no elections since then. The average age in Gaza is 17, well at least it was before the mass killing. Now do the math how many Gazans who live today have possibly voted for Hamas. 3. Hamas was elected in Gaza’s first free elections after Israel had given it back to the Palestinians after 40 years of brutal occupation with many Palestinians killed and tortured. Whom exactly did you expect them to vote for? Some pro-Israeli party? Hamas is a reaction to brutal occupation. Simple as that. And occupied people have a right to resist. Occupying people and illegal settlers have no rights. Palestinians in the West Bank have not attacked Israel and still their land is stolen every day. What a great legacy for the chosen people.

Basically you are following the Zio propaganda by indirectly bringing up the question “who was there first?”. The implication being whoever was there first deserves ownership of the land. An interesting example of how people learn just enough history to support their world view, The argument is simple to follow: "Palestinians today are mostly Arabs. The Arabs came to the Levant with the Muslim conquest or as refugees in the late 19 early 20 century so they have only been in Palestine and the Levant for a short period of time." You are clearly conflating of Arabs, Muslims and Palestinians. None of these are interchangeable. Arabs have had a long history in the Levant before the advent of Islam. After Islam conquered the region Arabic speaking officials made it law that the language of state and of commerce would become Arabic. Thus, it became advantageous to assimilate into this identity, as many government positions and trade deals were offered only to Muslim Arabs. So, although most of the population of these lands were not ethnically Arab, they came to identify as such over a millennium. In contrast to European colonialism of the new world, where the native population was mostly eradicated to make place for the invaders, the process in Middle East and North Africa is one of the conquered peoples mixing with and coming to identify as their conquerors without being physically removed. Following from this, the Palestinian Arabs of today did not suddenly appear as refugees to settle in Palestine, but are the same indigenous peoples living there who changed how they identified over time. When regions change rulers, they don’t normally change populations. Throughout history, peoples have often changed how they identified politically. The problem with this kind of discussion is that it implies that Israel’s creation is justified/unjustified is because their Jewish/Palestinian ancestors were there first. It implies that the problem with the argument lies in the details, not that the argument as a whole is absolute nonsense and shouldn’t even be entertained. The ethnic cleansing, massacres and colonialism needed to establish Israel can never be justified, regardless of who was there first. Even if we follow the argument that Palestinians have only been there for a few decades or centuries, does this suddenly legitimize the expulsion of hundreds of thousands? Of course not. There is no possible scenario where it is excusable to ethnically cleanse a people and colonize their lands. Human rights apply to people universally, regardless of whether they have lived in an area for a year or ten thousand years.

Good one. Cant wait for the answer.

What I like about her: she is honest. She openly talks about her criminal intentions. Not like those lying snakes in governments. Israel: Only 2 dozen civilian victims in Rafah. Beheaded babies. US: Don't fight Gaza with so much brutality. Weapons on the way. Germany: We never said we stopped sending weapons to Israel. We just said we will not approve new deals.

No I don`t. Yes I do. No they don`t. You wrote: You are saying the Palestinians were only refugees from Syria and Egypt who were trapped in Gaza and the Westbank between the 1948 and 1967 wars. I wonder whom the Jews were fighting so hard in the decades before 1948 and where did these 750.000 people come from they expelled 1948? And if you think the Jews are the native people explain this

Oh dear, don`t you get it? Hamas was born because of the oppression of the Palestinians by Israel (and with the help of Bibi). As long as there is oppression there will be resistance. Hamas may disappear but will come back under another name and Israel atrocities have risen the wrath of Millions of young Muslims worldwide. Do you have videos or pics to prove that. No pics - it never happened. Sounds familiar, doesn`t it?

I must admit I agree with you on that point, not only because I am German and any statement like this could get me into prison easily but because the motives were different. The Israelis have same as the Nazis dehumanized the Palestinians to kill them by the Hundreds and made up some interpretation of history and religion to prove they are direct descendants of the Great Israel which stretched between the river and the sea for centuries, while it was for less than 40 years, to justify their land theft same as the Nazis made up some race theories about them being the superior race while Jews being some inferior parasitic race trying to defile Arian blood. That being said Israelis just want Palestinian land and the Palestinians to somehow disappear. They would most likely prefer it if the Palestinians would relocate to the surrounding Arab countries, blend in and be forgotten, while in Nazi Germany, where Jews at first were just kicked out after 1941 being a Jew was a death sentence. And they did it on an industrial level and well coordinated - the most horrific crime against humanity in human history. Which later led to the Nurnberg trials and creation of the United Nations, which became a key instrument of international law and the first Declaration of Human Rights, laws and rights that are now too easily broken by those, who were murdered by the millions and later caused their creation.

I agree with you but the justifications from the Zionists are more or less based on that and I was debating on the same level. Personally I think that`s BS. All 3 religions have their connection to the place and if someone in our modern time still believes what some shepherds made up Millenia ago, up to them but coming back after 3000 years with a lot of foreign DNA mixed in their genome making them look more European than Hebrew and claiming that only for themselves is a bad joke. I would not call it "spiritual" although it also starts with an "s". Jokes aside because my life in Thailand is so much better in every single aspect and I cannot relate to the mentality back home anymore.

Guys, seriously?

What a perfect example of rewriting history! So Israel was occupied by the Ottoman Empire and then somehow "gained" it`s liberation. What have you been smoking? Israel surfaced some 3000 years ago and disappeared from the face of the world 300 years later just to have a brief reappearance around 2000 years ago and then vanish again after 67 years. No more Israel since then. Well until 76 years ago, when it came back from the dead causing death since then. Are you mistaking creation with dividing? And had the native people any say in that "creation" as you call it? You must be in the advertisement industry. Probably could sell refrigerators to the Inuit easily.

That has been debunked long ago. DNA does not lie. More recent studies since 2017 have found that Palestinians – as well as other Levantine people – are primarily descended from ancient Levantines who inhabited what is today Israel and Palestine, at least 3700 years ago. According to Marc Heber et al, all modern Levantine Arabs descend from Canaanite-like ancestors, and later migrations' impact on their population ancestry was slight. (1) and Andrew Lawler (2) 1. Mark Heber: "All Levantines descend from Canaanite-like ancestors (Haber et al 2017, Agranat-Tamir 2020). Later admixture slightly changed ancestry". 17 January 2024. 2. Lawler, Andrew (28 September 2020). "DNA from the Bible's Canaanites lives on in modern Arabs and Jews". National Geographic.

Why are you intentionally misinterpreting me? I have no problem with Jews or a Jewish homeland and I fully understand why it was created not in Canada or Africa but in the place, with which Jews have a religious and spiritual connection. But Israel denies others the same rights it demands for itself. Because others have developed a spiritual connection to that land too, aka Christians and Muslims, the first are regularly spat on and the latter treated as second class humans by law and sometimes killed. And much more important others have lived there for centuries and many generations and Israel thinks it has the right to kick them out while some redhaired man from Omaha with funny braids has the right to return and to kill Palestinians. . This Israeli had no right to do that. Where is your criticism for that? It is you who denies Palestinians the right to exist by supporting a country which has done everything to avoid a Palestinian state, has stolen their land and if like recently Western countries recognize Palestine Israeli politicians smirk and say "Recognize what? There is nothing to recognize there anymore." So once again: Israel as a modern democracy with equal rights for everybody and after giving back the stolen land: YES Israel as an apartheid state with different laws for it`s citizens a military law for the stolen areas: NO Do you think Palestine has a right to exist?

You forgot to call me an anti - Semite. Which is so typical as a reaction for any criticism. That is the ONLY reason I am against them!! Their goddamned racial apartheid system and their killing of innocent women and children for decades while whining and presenting themselves as the victims. And all their other lies with which I grew up. The area is a conflict zone for 100 years now, because the Jews there wanted their "for Jews only" state and had no better idea to create that in an area which was Muslim for more than a Millenia justifying it with some myth of an ancient Israel 3000 years ago which never existed in the way they glorify it and ceased to exist 2500 years ago. A conflict which had and still has horrible impacts on the rest of the world by pulling other countries into it and causing hostilities and enmities which would otherwise never exist and which brought nothing but death and desperation to the people of the surrounding countries same as to the soldiers of western countries which Israel persuaded into it`s war not to speak of it`s decade long bribing of our leaders and brainwash of our societies resulting in educated western people raised with humanity and Christian values disgustingly applauding the mass murder of women and children.