
Mike Lister
Advanced Member-
Posts
6,717 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Events
Forums
Downloads
Quizzes
Gallery
Blogs
Everything posted by Mike Lister
-
The time gap doesn't make any difference in this comparison, the quality is self evident, 5 star is 5 star which unless you've actually experienced it, is perhaps best not commented on. Yes, I have sought medical care in local hospitals and I've been with my wife when she had surgery at the government hospital. The decorative condition of the patient rooms was poor, as were the furnishings etc but I could not fault the medical care. A nurse/medic explored a wound on my foot in expert style and with great efficiency, meanwhile, chaos and bedlam was ongoing all around me. Children screaming, a dozen patients laid out on gurneys, blood spills on the floor, chaotic and a nightmare by western standards but the medical care I received was excellent, as was my wife's.
-
I worked for Mount Sinai Hospital on Miami Beach in the 1980's, I do know what a good quality hospital looks like. In November last year I spent five days in Sriphat University Hospital Chiang Mai whilst having my thyroid removed, the standard of service, the quality and training of staff and the facilities were at least on par with Mount Sinai, if not much better in some areas.
-
Whereas I would suggest it's only a storm in the minds of a few. Your statement that "there will and must come more clarification from the TRD" is interesting....I'm betting not, why would there be. Were you imagining that instructions will be mailed, slots made available for tutorials in prime time TV? The TRD Code has existed for decades, albeit it is tweaked from time to time. A small change was made to one rule last year and it was announced, what more needs to be said. The locals must be watching all this farang angst and giggling in embarrassment, they don't see any problem whatsoever. "If farang no understand, why he not go TRD office and ask or read Revenue book", they must be saying. They would have a point! A big part of the problem is that many foreigners are expecting a process similar to "back home", which I'm pretty certain aint going to happen.
-
The TRD doesn't give that sort of advice, that only happens back in nanny pampered land where it's assumed that people can't tie their own shoe laces without being told how. It's down to us to work these things out and I think many of us have. When I posted my reply that you quoted, I didn't write out in long hand all the words that would make my statement 100% grammatically and factually correct. At this late stage in the game, we are after all 8 months in to these discussions, it has to be assumed that most people understand that the "threshold" refers to assessable income. If some people don't understand that, they are latecomers who have some reading and catching up to do.
-
Re 1: What do you imagine locals do, however do they get by!!! Re 2: That's a seriously funny statement, the closest I could get to the reality is that Thailand is classed as Developing rather than Developed. The 12 successful coups and structure of the parliament, hardly classes the country as a democracy, not when 72% of the population voted for a party that was then beaten into second place.
-
Nonsense! The definition of tax resident has been well understood and documented in the TRD code for decades! The fact that foreigners mostly chose to ignore their obligation to Thai tax and this was not uniformly enforced, doesn't change much of anything. FWIW I've been filing Thai tax returns for several years, solely on the basis of remitted funds from overseas.
-
As the tax guide states, the threshold varies based on marital status and source of income. The penalty for not filing a return where no tax is due, is a possible fine of 2k baht. More importantly, not filing once the threshold has been breached, exposes you to back audits spanning the past ten years, instead of the normal three. Penalties for not filing where tax is due, are draconian.
-
Ignorance of the law is not usually a good defense in any country, least of all here, I imagine. The average person may not be a member of AN but they might be expected to read newspapers, read online forums/periodicals, have a visa agent and/or they might be expected to have a bank account, all of which would inform them of what changes have been implemented. Waiting for an official notice to appear in the mail box, seems to me to be bloody minded rather than practical or sensible but each to their own.
-
I can clarify that the law has been put into effect and that all tax residents are expected to comply with it. If individuals are waiting for personalised invitations or instructions to be pushed through their mail boxes, it may prove to be a very long wait. In the meantime, the rules will not have been suspended, neither will the expectation of compliance with them. Perhaps those waiting for such notification should pinch themselves and remember where they are and try to recall when was the last time they had a personalised invitation from government to do anything! As she said, Toto, I have a feeling we're not in Kansas any more!