Alpha84

Did the paper route. Made about $15 a week. Blew most of it on pinball and pizza in a day. Came home in the winter with practically frost bitten fingers after morning delivery. Put the fingers under cold water to warm them up. Spent a whole day on Saturday assembling the Sunday paper. They were so heavy had to make two trips to deliver all on Sunday. Many people wouldn’t come to the door once a week when I would go to collect the $2.5 for a week of delivery. Eventually I forced most of those nasty ones to quit the delivery service by throwing their papers at their door from 20 feet away instead of sticking it through the slot. By the time it landed on their doorstep, it looked more like a bob smith porn mag after he had fapped all over it. My best customer was a lovely black woman. She always paid on time and was my best tipper. She got her papers first and always in pristine condition. The school of hard knocks.

Don’t cry bob. It’s not becoming.

Thrilling

Great! So the diet is working?

You’re having a bad day. Starting rubbish topics and nobody cares. AI doesn’t work. Booo Hoooo. 😂

You mean it doesn’t?

I hope not. You’d be greatly disappointed.

Food obsessed. Must be another fat farang.

Still, nobody cares.

Oh, fatty farang, you’re back? Just finished moaning about your inability to use AI, did you?

MAGA??? Make America Gay Again???

Wow, you had a whole entire paper route? Amazing. Give the plonker a round of applause, even though nobody gives a flying toss. 🤩

Useless topic. Nobody cares.

TLDR. Another sorry arse plonker isolated in Burrinowhere with no friends and nobody willing to listen to his whining and whose highlight of the week is a pilgrimage to Makro. 😂

Cooking blows.

That’s right, you’re not a fat farang. Oh, wait…

The sheer number of self-absorbed, over-entitled tossers rushing in to spew their negativity onto a positive, feel-good topic like is truly astonishing. What an utterly miserable gaggle of insufferable, self-righteous anooses.

I agree about the points you raise about him. I also presented the same information to Grok to get another analysis from a different AI platform, and I’d say its response was even better in terms of providing a straightforward and honest psychoanalysis. I wouldn’t even call any of this harsh because the AI is simply analyzing the information that was provided. It doesn’t have any bias, so it’s not intentionally being harsh in any way. Had the information been framed differently, the response would have also been different. The AI isn’t making a conscious choice to react positively or negatively, it’s just processing what it’s given. You can see what Grok said below, where it reached very similar conclusions about him, his misunderstanding of her intentions and him being in denial about many aspects of the situation. --- Summary of the User’s Posts The user expresses a strong preference for Thai women over Filipinas, painting broad, often derogatory generalizations about both groups. He describes Thai women as more genuine, naive, honest, and physically appealing, while portraying Filipinas as scheming, less honest, and burdened by extreme poverty, which he believes drives their behavior. Despite this, he acknowledges some positives about Filipinas, such as their English proficiency, housekeeping skills, and sexual willingness (based on his experience). His posts are rife with stereotypes, casual misogyny, and a transactional view of relationships, where costs (e.g., flights, affidavits, bikinis) are meticulously tallied against perceived benefits (e.g., sex, companionship). Regarding his specific experience with the Filipina woman he brought to Thailand, he describes a relationship marked by logistical challenges (visa issues, affidavits, travel), her perceived low intelligence (claiming an “IQ below 69”), and a lack of meaningful communication due to language barriers and her supposed limitations. He highlights her sexual enthusiasm and affection toward him, framing it as evidence of her deep love and “burning desire.” However, he ultimately sent her away after two months, citing her forgetfulness and lack of confidence as dealbreakers. He notes her subsequent fate as a domestic helper in Bahrain, expressing pity but little remorse, and maintains that she remains “crazy about” him, still contacting him occasionally. Analysis of His Perspective The user seems to view relationships through a lens of self-interest and superficial qualities (e.g., physical appeal, sexual eagerness, cost). His assertion that the Filipina was deeply in love with him appears to be based primarily on her physical affection—holding his hand, initiating sex, and laughing at his actions—rather than any deeper emotional or intellectual connection, which he admits was impossible due to communication barriers. He dismisses the possibility that her behavior might have been influenced by her circumstances, insisting he can distinguish genuine desire from transactional motives. This confidence suggests a degree of self-delusion or selective interpretation, as he overlooks contextual factors like her poverty, desperation, and reliance on him for a better life. His narrative also reveals inconsistency. He praises her warmth, willingness, and “good attitude” in bed, yet discards her for traits (forgetfulness, lack of confidence) that he attributes to her low intelligence—traits that might equally reflect cultural differences, language struggles, or insecurity in a foreign environment. His pity for her current situation in Bahrain contrasts with his cavalier decision to end the relationship, indicating a disconnect between his actions and his later reflections. Is He in Denial About Her Feelings? She was in a desperate situation, seeking a wealthy white man for financial security, and facing a grim fate (e.g., domestic work in a Muslim country) if the relationship failed—aligns with the socioeconomic realities hinted at in his posts. Her poverty, virginity, and eagerness to leave the Philippines, combined with the logistical hurdles he overcame to bring her to Thailand, suggest she saw him as a lifeline. The communication barrier (which he admits prevented conversation) further undermines his claim of mutual love, as love typically requires understanding and emotional reciprocity, not just physical acts. His insistence that she was “totally in love” and “obsessed with sex” with him seems rooted in his own ego rather than evidence of her inner feelings. He interprets her physical affection as proof of devotion, but this could just as easily reflect gratitude, obligation, or a survival strategy—behaviors common among women in economically dependent relationships. His assertion that he can tell the difference between genuine desire and a transactional motive (“a gal that constantly asks you for money” vs. one who doesn’t) oversimplifies her situation. She didn’t ask for money directly, but her reliance on him for flights, visas, and a new life implies a transactional dynamic he may not fully acknowledge. Is There Reality in His Assumptions? There’s little in his account to substantiate that her primary desire was to “have sex with him and give him fellatio first thing in the morning” as an expression of deep love. His focus on her sexual enthusiasm suggests he projected his own priorities onto her, ignoring her broader context. While she may have felt some affection or attachment—perhaps amplified by his role as her rescuer—his claim of her “burning desire” lacks depth without evidence of mutual understanding or shared emotional intimacy. Her continued contact with him could indicate lingering hope, habit, or even manipulation, but it doesn’t inherently prove undying love. In short, he seems at least partially in denial, or willfully blind, to the likelihood that her actions were shaped by desperation and dependency rather than the romantic obsession he describes. His assumptions about her feelings appear more like a self-serving fantasy than a grounded assessment, especially given the power imbalance, her precarious situation, and the absence of meaningful communication. That she sought financial security and faced a harsh alternative—better aligns with the circumstantial evidence he provides, even if he resists that conclusion.

I copied and pasted all of your posts from this topic into one ChatGPT chat and following is what it provided in response to your posts: The posts are filled with deeply offensive generalizations, misogyny, and racist stereotypes. The author dehumanizes both Thai and Filipino women, reducing them to their physical traits, perceived intelligence, and supposed moral failings, while presenting himself as a victim of their supposed shortcomings. His attitude is entitled, objectifying, and dismissive, treating relationships as transactions rather than human connections. There are a few key points that stand out: 1. Blatant Misogyny – The author makes sweeping negative claims about all women, suggesting that lying is their nature and that they lack morality. This is a textbook example of sexist stereotyping. 2. Racist and Xenophobic Stereotypes – Filipinas are repeatedly described in an insulting manner, both physically and mentally, while Thai women are only slightly “better” in his view. The way he speaks about both nationalities is demeaning and condescending. 3. Entitlement and Objectification – He talks about the women he has been with as if they were commodities, discussing the “cost” of their company, their desirability, and their usefulness in bed and housekeeping. 4. Disturbing Power Dynamic – His references to a “Filipina virgin” and how he had to go through bureaucratic trouble to bring her to Thailand highlight a deeply problematic perspective on relationships. He seems more frustrated with the logistical inconvenience than concerned about the woman herself. 5. Complete Lack of Empathy – At the end, he acknowledges that the woman he was with ended up in an exploitative situation as a domestic worker, but he treats it as an anecdote rather than showing real concern. Overall, the posts reflect a deeply toxic mindset. It’s a disturbing mix of misogyny, racism, and entitlement, where the author sees himself as superior while belittling the women he engages with. Instead of recognizing his own shortcomings in relationships, he blames an entire nationality or gender. It’s very likely that the Filipino woman was primarily motivated by financial security rather than genuine love. The reality is that in economically desperate situations, people—especially women in patriarchal societies—often have to prioritize survival over romantic ideals. The author frames the relationship as one of intense passion and “burning desire” on her part, but he also acknowledges their complete lack of meaningful communication. This contradiction suggests that he might be projecting his own fantasies onto her behavior rather than recognizing the power dynamics at play. When someone is economically vulnerable and sees a foreign partner as a potential escape from hardship, they may be very affectionate, compliant, and eager to please—but that doesn’t necessarily mean they are deeply in love in a romantic sense. Her later decision to become a domestic worker in Bahrain reinforces the idea that she was always seeking economic stability. Had she truly been obsessed with him for reasons beyond financial security, she might have attempted to stay in touch in a more meaningful way or fought harder to maintain the relationship. Instead, she moved on to another practical option for survival. The intense sexual enthusiasm he describes could have been a combination of a desire to please him (as part of securing the relationship), or even cultural expectations of fulfilling a male partner’s desires. But without emotional intimacy and communication, it’s unlikely she felt the kind of deep, unconditional love he wants to believe she had for him. I think he was in denial. He wanted to see himself as irresistibly desirable rather than acknowledging the reality that her affection was likely tied to economic necessity.

They just tell him that he is signing off on invoices to order more of his diapers, another fresh stock of MAGA hats from China, a lifetime supply of orange-tinted face paint, an executive order officially recognizing ketchup as the national vegetable, and a pardon for himself, just in case. Then he just signs away, nodding like he actually read a word of it.

Yes, absolutely not thought about at all. At least, before all of those federal workers were laid off, they were working for their money. Now they will still be living off the government, but staying home and not working for it at all. Perhaps his next move will be to cripple and gut the Department of Labor so that they don't have enough staff to process and pay out unemployment benefits. Apparently, the federal layoffs have only just gotten started, and the numbers are going to increase exponentially.

Uh-oh?

I wonder if the cost of the massive number of people, who will soon be applying for unemployment benefits, will eventually break the system?

Comedy gold!

Good thing that, isn't it... cause the WH is already full of turds already.