Alpha84

Cooking blows.

That’s right, you’re not a fat farang. Oh, wait…

The sheer number of self-absorbed, over-entitled tossers rushing in to spew their negativity onto a positive, feel-good topic like is truly astonishing. What an utterly miserable gaggle of insufferable, self-righteous anooses.

I agree about the points you raise about him. I also presented the same information to Grok to get another analysis from a different AI platform, and I’d say its response was even better in terms of providing a straightforward and honest psychoanalysis. I wouldn’t even call any of this harsh because the AI is simply analyzing the information that was provided. It doesn’t have any bias, so it’s not intentionally being harsh in any way. Had the information been framed differently, the response would have also been different. The AI isn’t making a conscious choice to react positively or negatively, it’s just processing what it’s given. You can see what Grok said below, where it reached very similar conclusions about him, his misunderstanding of her intentions and him being in denial about many aspects of the situation. --- Summary of the User’s Posts The user expresses a strong preference for Thai women over Filipinas, painting broad, often derogatory generalizations about both groups. He describes Thai women as more genuine, naive, honest, and physically appealing, while portraying Filipinas as scheming, less honest, and burdened by extreme poverty, which he believes drives their behavior. Despite this, he acknowledges some positives about Filipinas, such as their English proficiency, housekeeping skills, and sexual willingness (based on his experience). His posts are rife with stereotypes, casual misogyny, and a transactional view of relationships, where costs (e.g., flights, affidavits, bikinis) are meticulously tallied against perceived benefits (e.g., sex, companionship). Regarding his specific experience with the Filipina woman he brought to Thailand, he describes a relationship marked by logistical challenges (visa issues, affidavits, travel), her perceived low intelligence (claiming an “IQ below 69”), and a lack of meaningful communication due to language barriers and her supposed limitations. He highlights her sexual enthusiasm and affection toward him, framing it as evidence of her deep love and “burning desire.” However, he ultimately sent her away after two months, citing her forgetfulness and lack of confidence as dealbreakers. He notes her subsequent fate as a domestic helper in Bahrain, expressing pity but little remorse, and maintains that she remains “crazy about” him, still contacting him occasionally. Analysis of His Perspective The user seems to view relationships through a lens of self-interest and superficial qualities (e.g., physical appeal, sexual eagerness, cost). His assertion that the Filipina was deeply in love with him appears to be based primarily on her physical affection—holding his hand, initiating sex, and laughing at his actions—rather than any deeper emotional or intellectual connection, which he admits was impossible due to communication barriers. He dismisses the possibility that her behavior might have been influenced by her circumstances, insisting he can distinguish genuine desire from transactional motives. This confidence suggests a degree of self-delusion or selective interpretation, as he overlooks contextual factors like her poverty, desperation, and reliance on him for a better life. His narrative also reveals inconsistency. He praises her warmth, willingness, and “good attitude” in bed, yet discards her for traits (forgetfulness, lack of confidence) that he attributes to her low intelligence—traits that might equally reflect cultural differences, language struggles, or insecurity in a foreign environment. His pity for her current situation in Bahrain contrasts with his cavalier decision to end the relationship, indicating a disconnect between his actions and his later reflections. Is He in Denial About Her Feelings? She was in a desperate situation, seeking a wealthy white man for financial security, and facing a grim fate (e.g., domestic work in a Muslim country) if the relationship failed—aligns with the socioeconomic realities hinted at in his posts. Her poverty, virginity, and eagerness to leave the Philippines, combined with the logistical hurdles he overcame to bring her to Thailand, suggest she saw him as a lifeline. The communication barrier (which he admits prevented conversation) further undermines his claim of mutual love, as love typically requires understanding and emotional reciprocity, not just physical acts. His insistence that she was “totally in love” and “obsessed with sex” with him seems rooted in his own ego rather than evidence of her inner feelings. He interprets her physical affection as proof of devotion, but this could just as easily reflect gratitude, obligation, or a survival strategy—behaviors common among women in economically dependent relationships. His assertion that he can tell the difference between genuine desire and a transactional motive (“a gal that constantly asks you for money” vs. one who doesn’t) oversimplifies her situation. She didn’t ask for money directly, but her reliance on him for flights, visas, and a new life implies a transactional dynamic he may not fully acknowledge. Is There Reality in His Assumptions? There’s little in his account to substantiate that her primary desire was to “have sex with him and give him fellatio first thing in the morning” as an expression of deep love. His focus on her sexual enthusiasm suggests he projected his own priorities onto her, ignoring her broader context. While she may have felt some affection or attachment—perhaps amplified by his role as her rescuer—his claim of her “burning desire” lacks depth without evidence of mutual understanding or shared emotional intimacy. Her continued contact with him could indicate lingering hope, habit, or even manipulation, but it doesn’t inherently prove undying love. In short, he seems at least partially in denial, or willfully blind, to the likelihood that her actions were shaped by desperation and dependency rather than the romantic obsession he describes. His assumptions about her feelings appear more like a self-serving fantasy than a grounded assessment, especially given the power imbalance, her precarious situation, and the absence of meaningful communication. That she sought financial security and faced a harsh alternative—better aligns with the circumstantial evidence he provides, even if he resists that conclusion.

I copied and pasted all of your posts from this topic into one ChatGPT chat and following is what it provided in response to your posts: The posts are filled with deeply offensive generalizations, misogyny, and racist stereotypes. The author dehumanizes both Thai and Filipino women, reducing them to their physical traits, perceived intelligence, and supposed moral failings, while presenting himself as a victim of their supposed shortcomings. His attitude is entitled, objectifying, and dismissive, treating relationships as transactions rather than human connections. There are a few key points that stand out: 1. Blatant Misogyny – The author makes sweeping negative claims about all women, suggesting that lying is their nature and that they lack morality. This is a textbook example of sexist stereotyping. 2. Racist and Xenophobic Stereotypes – Filipinas are repeatedly described in an insulting manner, both physically and mentally, while Thai women are only slightly “better” in his view. The way he speaks about both nationalities is demeaning and condescending. 3. Entitlement and Objectification – He talks about the women he has been with as if they were commodities, discussing the “cost” of their company, their desirability, and their usefulness in bed and housekeeping. 4. Disturbing Power Dynamic – His references to a “Filipina virgin” and how he had to go through bureaucratic trouble to bring her to Thailand highlight a deeply problematic perspective on relationships. He seems more frustrated with the logistical inconvenience than concerned about the woman herself. 5. Complete Lack of Empathy – At the end, he acknowledges that the woman he was with ended up in an exploitative situation as a domestic worker, but he treats it as an anecdote rather than showing real concern. Overall, the posts reflect a deeply toxic mindset. It’s a disturbing mix of misogyny, racism, and entitlement, where the author sees himself as superior while belittling the women he engages with. Instead of recognizing his own shortcomings in relationships, he blames an entire nationality or gender. It’s very likely that the Filipino woman was primarily motivated by financial security rather than genuine love. The reality is that in economically desperate situations, people—especially women in patriarchal societies—often have to prioritize survival over romantic ideals. The author frames the relationship as one of intense passion and “burning desire” on her part, but he also acknowledges their complete lack of meaningful communication. This contradiction suggests that he might be projecting his own fantasies onto her behavior rather than recognizing the power dynamics at play. When someone is economically vulnerable and sees a foreign partner as a potential escape from hardship, they may be very affectionate, compliant, and eager to please—but that doesn’t necessarily mean they are deeply in love in a romantic sense. Her later decision to become a domestic worker in Bahrain reinforces the idea that she was always seeking economic stability. Had she truly been obsessed with him for reasons beyond financial security, she might have attempted to stay in touch in a more meaningful way or fought harder to maintain the relationship. Instead, she moved on to another practical option for survival. The intense sexual enthusiasm he describes could have been a combination of a desire to please him (as part of securing the relationship), or even cultural expectations of fulfilling a male partner’s desires. But without emotional intimacy and communication, it’s unlikely she felt the kind of deep, unconditional love he wants to believe she had for him. I think he was in denial. He wanted to see himself as irresistibly desirable rather than acknowledging the reality that her affection was likely tied to economic necessity.

They just tell him that he is signing off on invoices to order more of his diapers, another fresh stock of MAGA hats from China, a lifetime supply of orange-tinted face paint, an executive order officially recognizing ketchup as the national vegetable, and a pardon for himself, just in case. Then he just signs away, nodding like he actually read a word of it.

Yes, absolutely not thought about at all. At least, before all of those federal workers were laid off, they were working for their money. Now they will still be living off the government, but staying home and not working for it at all. Perhaps his next move will be to cripple and gut the Department of Labor so that they don't have enough staff to process and pay out unemployment benefits. Apparently, the federal layoffs have only just gotten started, and the numbers are going to increase exponentially.

Uh-oh?

I wonder if the cost of the massive number of people, who will soon be applying for unemployment benefits, will eventually break the system?

Comedy gold!

Good thing that, isn't it... cause the WH is already full of turds already.

Yes and it's only going to get worse too as you said. Trump has paused the tariffs on Canada for another month, but Canada has not paused any of their reciprocal tariffs on the US. Meanwhile, Canada buys more US exports than China, Japan, and a number of other countries combined. Canadians have already started boycotting a number of American products. Even if Trump flip-flops on his tariffs, and never really puts them into effect on Canada, the damage is already done. Canadian sentiment has already shifted and unlikely to shift back until Trump is out of office. Plus, his rhetoric about making Canada the 51st state and taking away its sovereignty is only souring sentiment even more. Always winning!

Homelessness is sure to increase in America over the coming months as unemployment continues to rise. Perhaps Trump can move all those homeless Americans out into tents in the desert in Egypt, along with all the Palestinians from Gaza while he builds himself a new golf course for him and Vlad to put around on together.

This month, the unemployment rate in America ticked up to 4.1%. Next month, it's likely to exceed that, which will raise the unemployment level in America to the highest it's been since the Covid crash. Homelessness should increase too. Making America Gutted Again!

Thank you for pointing that out Susan, I mean BigNok, I mean Harris the stalker, oh, never mind.

Making America Great Again? A report by global outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas released Thursday said that planned job cuts surged 245% in February to 172,017 last month. That's the highest level since July 2020, when the economy was reeling from restrictions related to the COVID pandemic, and the highest total for February since the Great Recession in 2009. Source: https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/us-job-cuts-surge-245-february-federal-government-layoffs https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/us-announced-job-cuts-surge-245-february-federal-government-layoffs-2025-03-06/

Susan, we thought you were sporting a mangina?

It’s fascinating, in a rather tragic way, to watch Harrisfan, so utterly intoxicated by an online forum, that he's lost all self-awareness. When you strip away the smug, hostile one-liners and hollow antagonism, what’s left? A person who spends nearly every waking hour, posting over two thousand times per week, desperately seeking even the smallest acknowledgment of their own existence from an anonymous chat messaging site. It’s not about discussion, engagement, or contributing anything of value. It’s an addiction, plain and simple. The endless stream of posts isn’t a choice anymore; it’s a compulsive, obsessive feedback loop, one that has completely overtaken and reduced his life to a deeply troubled existence of mental illness. At this point, it’s not even about the content of his posts. Whether they’re being demeaning, nasty, bitter, or pretending to be performatively disinterested, the only thing that really matters to him is the response. He can’t function without it. It’s the same psychological mechanism as any other dependency, just another hit of dopamine from every reply, every emoji, every moment where someone acknowledges that he exists, even if it’s in the form of the usual disgust he receives back from most other members. This isn’t participation in a community. It’s a loop, an endless cycle of needing to be seen and heard, to be responded to, to feel something, anything, in a life that clearly has nothing else going for it. The most telling part? He doesn't even deny it. He can’t. Instead, he deflects, minimizes, and pretends it’s all just a bit of harmless fun, all while his post count continues to tick up into the thousands week after week. The forum has banned him multiple times for his toxic and unwarranted attacks against others, yet he crawls back under new accounts within minutes, unable to break free, unable to let go. And deep down, he knows it. There’s no escape for him, no real control. A serial troll run amok to the highest level. This place owns Harris/Susan/BigNok now. It’s not a pastime for him, it’s a prison. And the saddest part is, he built his cage of isolation all by himself.

Only you. That's the problem.

Bravo. Your mental gymnastics are truly something to behold. “0.1% of my life,” really? You are physically incapable of making a post without immediately contradicting reality. You drop nearly 300 posts a day according to your weekly post count displayed on AN that shows you've made more than 2,000 posts over the last 7 days, which, unless you’ve cracked some secret code to stretching time, means you’re glued to this site for three-quarters of your waking life. It’s not a hobby. It’s not entertainment. It’s an addiction. And worse, it’s one you’ve lost complete control over. I’ve fully figured it out now. It’s not that you want to spend your life this way, it’s that you can’t stop. It’s obsessive compulsive disorder taken to an extreme. You’ve tried to cut it off before, maybe even convinced yourself you could step away. But you failed. And now? Now, you’ve just submitted to it. Fully surrendered. You tell yourself you’re here for the “human interaction” but the truth is, you’re here because you literally cannot exist without the micro-doses of dopamine that you get from any response, positive or negative. You don’t care about meaningful discussion, nor are you here to contribute anything of value as we discussed. No, you just need the acknowledgment, a signal from the void, or even a blackhole like an anonymous online forum, that you still exist. That someone, anyone, has noticed you. You’ve become the forum’s equivalent of those blokes who pay dominatrixes to humiliate, degrade, and try to intentionally hurt them. It’s not about connection, it’s about obsession. Your addiction is just as real, just as all-consuming. And that’s the real difference between us. You claim “nobody will read” what I wrote? But that’s the thing, I don’t need them to. Unlike you, I’m not a prisoner to this place. I don’t require the validation. You, on the other hand? You can’t function without it. That’s why you’re already back here, clinging to the last shreds of denial, firing off the same predictable, tired responses, hoping someone, just anyone, throws another hit of acknowledgment your way. So go on there. Remain in your alternate reality, pretending that this site doest make up nearly your entire waking existence. Keep lying to yourself. We, and everyone else on AN all know exactly what you are and why you are here, as it is something clearly and totally beyond and out of your own control.

I genuinely can’t wrap my head around it. You pump out an average of 285 smug, antagonistic, completely substance-free posts per day, just a relentless flood of snide remarks, hollow one-liners, and bitter, attention-seeking drivel. This isn’t just a bad habit. This is your life. So tell us, how do you do it? More importantly, why do you do it? Have you ever stopped, even for a half second, to question your own existence? Is there truly nothing else out there for you? No real human contact, no meaningful pursuits, beyond spending two-thirds of your waking hours posting petty jabs and sharing photos of the sad, underwhelming and cheap looking meals that you seem to think impress people? You’ve been banned multiple times from what other members have noted. So the site itself has made it clear you’re not wanted, yet here you are, crawling back under new accounts like a sewer rat scurrying toward the nearest scrap of negativity. Doesn’t it get exhausting? Doesn’t it feel desperate? Or do you just need this? Do you thrive on the idea that even if people don't want you around, at least they’re paying attention to you? Or do you simply get off on the thousands of sad emojis left on your posts? At some point you’ve got to ask yourself, what exactly are you getting out of this? What's in it for you? Is this it? The end of the road and the grand sum of your existence? Sitting behind a screen, injecting more hostility into the world day after day, desperately trying to hijack every new and interesting discussion with your nastiness until people just give up and walk away out of disgust? Does that actually fulfill you? Because from the outside looking in, it just looks desperate and tragic.

Wow, nailed it, wouldn’t you say Harrisfrown?

Try doing both at the same time. You might end up with the tips of your fingers up your anose.

Cracker! lol.

You mean like farangs who wear Hawaiian shirts looking for meaning in a meanlingless world?