Everything posted by Schoggibueb
-
Russia's Lavrov Declares No Attack on EU or Nato Planned
At least the russians failed to influence the vote in Moldova. https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2025/09/29/moldovas-pro-eu-party-wins-key-polls-after-russian-meddling-claims-a90647
-
Tenderizing Thai Beef Tenderloin
Maybe marinate it in vinegar (not so good) or in pineapple juice. Works with spareribs too (falls off the bone).
- Trump Weighs Supplying Ukraine Long-Range Missiles
-
Trump Weighs Supplying Ukraine Long-Range Missiles
- Trump Weighs Supplying Ukraine Long-Range Missiles
- Ukraine can conduct strikes deep within Russian territory
'There are no such things as sanctuaries' — Ukraine can conduct strikes deep within Russian territory, Kellogg says https://kyivindependent.com/ukraine-can-conduct-strikes-deep-within-russian-territory-kellogg-says/ Washington has authorized specific instances where Ukraine can carry out long-range strikes within Russia, U.S. Special Envoy to Ukraine Keith Kellogg said on Sept. 28 in an interview with Fox News. "The answer is yes, use the ability to hit deep, there are no such things as sanctuaries," Kellogg replied when asked if it is U.S. President Donald Trump's position that Ukraine can conduct long-range strikes. President Volodymyr Zelensky reportedly asked Trump to supply Kyiv with Tomahawk long-range cruise missiles during a meeting on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly last week. The U.S. is "looking at" providing Kyiv with Tomahawk missiles as Moscow continues to refuse bilateral and trilateral peace talks brokered by Trump, U.S. Vice President JD Vance confirmed on Sept. 28. The final decision on whether Ukraine may conduct long-range strikes within Russia falls to Trump on a case-by-case basis, Kellogg noted. ... Russia has intensified violations of the EU's and NATO's airspace in recent weeks. Moscow violated Polish airspace on Sept. 10, prompting Warsaw to shoot down Russian drones over its territory in a first for any NATO member in over three years of Russia's full-scale war against Ukraine. On Sept. 19, three Russian jets violated Estonian airspace. As the U.S. allows Ukraine to conduct strikes deep within Russia, Washington is looking into providing Kyiv with additional weapons. "That is one of the reasons I believe that this last week, and it has been confirmed, that President Zelensky asked President Trump to give Tomahawk missiles," Kellogg said, adding that the final decision has not yet been made. As Russia continues to press along the front line with little progress and high losses, Kellogg noted that Moscow is not meeting its goals as it wages its war against Ukraine. "Russia is not winning this war. If they (were) winning, they would be in Kyiv, Odesa, they would be over the Dnipro river," he said. ...- FBI Fires Agents for Kneeling at George Floyd Protest
I'm a bit surprised. Thought that the US press are the "enemy of the people". So why aren't these "fake news media" sued and all the journalists who wrote this locked up? Irony OFF.- Axios: Trump's fuzzy math
Trump also recently claimed that 300 million people died from drug use last year. "What's illegal are ... the drugs that are being sent into our country, and the fact that 300 million people died last year from drugs." ... About 340 million people live in the U.S., according to the Census. It's unclear if the president meant that 300 million Americans died from drugs last year, or if he was referring to global deaths, but either way, his math is considerably off.- Axios: Trump's fuzzy math
... Reality check: Dr. William Padula, a health economist at the University of Southern California, told Axios that negotiating drug pricing to a 1,000% decrease would be an "uphill battle." "I don't have any mathematical explanation for that, other than we'd have to reconfigure our entire health system and infrastructure in order to operate more like other countries to get there," Padula said.- Axios: Trump's fuzzy math
https://www.axios.com/2025/09/27/trumps-fact-check-math-tariffs-fentanyl-drug President Trump and his administration frequently boast that he's "been right about everything" and that his policies have ushered in the "Golden Age" of America. The big picture: However, some of the president's sweeping claims, including slashing drug costs, combating fentanyl deaths and supercharging the American economy through tariffs, fall flat when compared to the actual data. Driving the news: Last week, the president said that his administration will be "reducing drug costs over the next year ... by not 50 or 60%, by a 1,000%." ...- Trump rapid escalation to an Authoritarian State
So you just replace news from 2021 with different likns that have nothing to do with your statement before. Called liar.- Trump rapid escalation to an Authoritarian State
Source - link ?- Trump rapid escalation to an Authoritarian State
That you call youself "Fact" is a bad joke. Should think about changing it to "alternative Fact".- Trump rapid escalation to an Authoritarian State
- Trump: "I hate my opponent and I don't want the best for them."
"THEY(!) are animals...- Trump: "I hate my opponent and I don't want the best for them."
So this was not Trump? You shouldn't call someone a liar when the evidence is so easy to find.- Trump: "I hate my opponent and I don't want the best for them."
Donald Trump called immigrants illegally in the United States "animals" and "not human" in a speech in Michigan in April 2024, resorting to the degrading rhetoric he has employed time and again on the campaign trail. "The Democrats say, 'Please don't call them animals. They're humans.' I said, 'No, they're not humans, they're not humans, they're animals,'" said Trump.- Trump: "I hate my opponent and I don't want the best for them."
"I hate my oppenent..." The very first post in this thread. You like to loose - don't you?! A repetition again. Same question - same answer.- Trump: "I hate my opponent and I don't want the best for them."
Ah - so he hates - fact. (->That’s simply a statement of fact.) But that isn't hate speach for you - fact. End of discussion - as you can't give answers - you lost again.- Trump: "I hate my opponent and I don't want the best for them."
"I hate my oppenent..." The very first post in this thread. You like to loose - don't you?!- Trump: "I hate my opponent and I don't want the best for them."
So nice that you have agreed to be a looser. But to pick it up - hate speach and lies are ok if Trump says something. I haven't read one comment here who could give me a clear statement why he is allowed to do so.- Trump: "I hate my opponent and I don't want the best for them."
No facts from youre side - you lost. I enjoy how easy you loose.- The Comey indictment clown show
Well I'm sure she has everything in her toolbox she needs for this job. 😂- Trump: "I hate my opponent and I don't want the best for them."
No, I don't hate him. It's more like a feeling before you have to throw up when I see him talking. And as you have now repeated your same statement - can you provide such hate speach from a former democratic POTUS? No, you can't. No winner - again...- Trump: "I hate my opponent and I don't want the best for them."
That's BS. And oh so everybody is soooo unfair to me. etc.pp. To break it down in simpler words than already above: Trumps version: "You critisize me - that's hate speach. If I say that I hate opponents - that's free speach." Of course you can't agree with the truth. But payback will come sooner or later. And you nor all Magastanies will belong to the winners in my personal oppinion.