Stiddle Mump

Of course some things are hereditary. don't deny that. Build, looks even memory. But where health is concerned I'd look no further that vaccines and medications.

I'd go immediately to the methodology on these sturies/experiments. How did they find, isolate and purify the virus? If they have done that then I'm very interested. Not yet seen it. And interestingly!? Where is the control? The experiment that runs alongside, but without the snot/mucus/juice?

They are not diseases Sir. Names given to symptoms.

Not one of the instances is it shown that a virus has been found, isolated and purified. Have to do that before anything else. The above is anti-scientist quackery working at his computer, and simply making assumptions.

Good you are well Sir. There are no such things as 'childhood diseases'.

Point me to a paper that shows where a virus exists, and this nonsense might make some sense.

Hereditary stuff,,,,,. Eh! What I'd be looking at is the medication the parents were on before conception. And, vitally important, what the mum was up to recreationally, environmentally and medically, for the following 9 months.

Oh no it isn't Sir. That's monumental hogwash.

As I have said many times; 'prevention' is the key. Also early recognition - early detection - of the problem. What is/are, and where is/are, the toxin(s), that is/are causing the cancer coming from. Give the body what it needs to fight the toxcity. Through diet and other factors. I did write a piece on cancer some time ago on AN. What to do if cancer is diagnosed? Nature has the answers we seek.

You probably didn't read my posts on another thread, but I was using electron microscopy quite a lot in the past. But, not for the last 30 years; I must add. Have things moved on in that time? Certainly computers, and computer software/programmes have gotten faster and more sophisticated. But the principles remain the same. The electron microscope gives a dyed, two dimensional image, of an extremely thin slice of a concoction, that was once in a petri dish. To make head n tail of it, requires one to know what one is actually looking for. This brings us back to those two magic words 'isolation' and 'purification'. Without this everything else is quite un-scientific. And as you know Sir, a virus - any virus - has never been isolated.

Good that you want to debate Sir. Cancer!? Let's get to it. My take is that cancer is the accumulatio of cells that are abnormal. The body, if healthy enough, can disperse these broken, and sometimes toxic-laden cells. However, if the body is lacking, or there is too much toxicity; either too much in one go, or over too long a time period, sothere is a build up, the body has to act to protect itself. How does it do this? By coating the renegade cells and storing them away. This is the start of a tumor. What happens next depends upon various things**. Nature has all the answers. ** Beyond the scope of this thread. But on another, I'd be only too willing to investigate 'cancer' in more depth.

First paragraph is true enough. She had the problem of Keratoconus when I met her. The damage was done when she was younger. Eye problems take a long while to sort out if the eye is damaged. With most problems, an understanding of prevention is better than any cure. And early intervention is vital before more serious complications set in. Nature has the answers we seek.

You just don't get it Trans. There is a reason for sickness. Find out why, and give the body every chance to right itself. Health is not difficult. It is the system, and white-coats themselves, that make it so, so complicated.

If I fall off me ladder and broke a leg. Or, was seriously injured in a car accident, I would seek help. A dagger in me back. Where is the doctor? But putting accidents aside, I wouldn't trust a white-coat as far as I could throw one. And I'll tell you why. Firstly; there are none so blind as will not see. And these white-coats are right up there with the biggest idiots of our era. Secondly; they are bound by protocols that stop them prescribing, even if they felt the need to, any remedy that could see them unsupported by their governing body or insurance. Thirdly they are controlled by Big Pharma (BP), and can only use the BP drugs. Four; they cannot see past symptoms, and issue drugs to lessen, or eradicate them. Even though they are the body at work. Five; they do not seem interested, in getting to the root causes of an illness. Six; A lot of western doctors start out their careers with huge debts. Seven; Being a white-coat should be a calling not a way to enrich oneself. Eight; They seem to be unaware of diet, environments or nature. These white-coats that relentlessly pump vaccine filth into kids and preggers women should be struck off, and denied the privilege to ever don a white coat again. They have conveniently forgotten that their first port of call is to help their patient, not enrich themselves or BP.

It's true Sir, that I don't agree with you, or you with me, but we can still debate health issues; can we not? What is the major sticking point for you? There is none for me. I'll debate any point, and answer any questions.