Harrisfan

Facts can be flawed due to various reasons, including decontextualization and cherry-picking. Decontextualizing a fact means presenting it without necessary context, leading to potential misunderstandings of its significance. For example, a study's findings might seem important and impressive without knowing the methods used or the limitations of the observations.3 Cherry-picking involves focusing on certain facts while ignoring others, creating a skewed perception of the whole picture. This can happen when several related facts are presented alone, giving a partial view of the subject.3 Additionally, fact-checking itself can be flawed. Different frames or questions posed during fact-checking can lead to different conclusions. For instance, in a fact-check involving Dan Crenshaw's statement about asylum seekers, PolitiFact rated it as false based on one definition of "valid," while Crenshaw used a different definition based on the outcomes of immigration court decisions.2 Furthermore, people's biases can influence how they perceive facts. Research shows that when confronted with facts they disagree with, individuals often do not change their perceptions and may even become more entrenched in their beliefs.4 Lastly, the term "fact" can be ambiguous. Something initially considered a fact can be proven incorrect in the future, as seen in historical shifts in scientific understanding, such as the explanation of gravity.

Name your friends on here.

7 or 8 on here and you always claim how smart you are. You're the opposite. Smart people live their chosen life. You're stuck in Isaan making an ass of yourself with people online.

25 days won 1 day won Fact

You're not smart at all. Arrogant and full of yourself. I would say you're actually very dumb. Only a fool would move to Isaan without research. Smart people research things before moving. You must be reading the wrong books or just not capable of thinking.

I see nobody likes him.

I know far more than you ever will. You're wasting your life arguing nonsense based on imperfect studies.

You need help. Federer is a high achiever yet 100x more humble.

You're full of crap. So called facts are often estimates and every decade the world changes a lot.

You are wasting your life arguing nonsense and beyond help. So arrogant and full of yourself.

You read books full of opinions. Even statistics are just opinions at one point in time. Like a political poll.

You're weird.

He loves himself and is never wrong. Claims he knows a lot due to books. Well he should read a book on being more humble.

You know it all.

He knows everything that guy. He will argue a losing side for 2 days then report you if you dont agree.

You are weird

So who cares

No. Everybody is full of it or guessing including so called experts. 2 out of 10,000 predicted the gfc. Climate scientists full of crap.

On here

Two types of people. Bs artists and liars.

Thats a model

Which is what I thought

Sample 1.

Try Isaan

Move to Canada