JakeC

It seems that he found the video and the content interesting and re-posted it. I don't think he specifically selected any particular uploader of the video. Personally, I would have thought the rat was an identifying emoji belonging to the uploader. Like a watermark. But the assumption is that he knew about it. So good has come out of it. Now we know and now more people know about Zionism and Israel. Win-Win, wouldn't you say? No need for all this hysteria and attempts at mind control.

Here is the video: I inspected it closely for any rats before posting. https://www.tiktok.com/@de_bunking_/video/7496228924364655874

There is nothing that can be regarded as anti-Semitic in the video itself. It's a woman telling the story of her family. How they were under military rule between 1948 and 1967 and how they were forced out and not ever allowed back, even though they are Israeli citizens. But I guess trying to make it all about a rat is purely a deflection.

Where is the video? Then we can decide if anything has been misrepresented. Free speech being attacked again. We are being told what we should think. No thank you.

Why the thumbs down? is it not possible that he overlooked it or do you imagine that he is an expert on rats and Zionists? It's certainly the first time I've ever read about it. Should a footballing expert be versed in such things?

I've seen the video. There's no sign of any rat. So the rat has nothing to do with the video. The rat must have been added by the original poster and likely Gary didn't know the significance and didn't think anything of it when he reposted it.