rough diamond

You should count yourself lucky, if you can count, as you appear to fully qualify with your obviously low IQ.

Yes what? Another moronic response. Goodnight on this topic as well.

For a change try to read and understand peoples answers to your repetitive moronic questions. Not all of any one country's defence spending is totally committed to NATO or any other alliance/obligation. It has other responsibilities out with NATO etc, especially the US!

NO. Parts of the US Military are assigned to NATO, other forces are assigned to other commands, https://nato.usmission.gov/

Something intelligent and non argumentative for a change.

Just like reading even only 1% of your daily boring and monotonous posts.

That counts you out as you do not fit the first category and claim not to fit the second one.

About your own one-sided blinkered opinions and nothing else.

Says the biggest attacker of a keyboard on AN.

It is capable of thinking??

There is absolutely no point in attempting ANY so called discussion on ANY subject with such a narrow minded and blinkered person as you. Goodbye.

NATO does not by gas from Russia. Certain countries who are members of NATO may be doing so.

Ask Putin and his puppet Trump.

If you are going to wrongly requote someone's post it might help if you did not lie by including "I have said this before!" when you have NOT made that post before, especially wrt the rest of THEIR (my) post. Now that you have agreed with me in your last post regarding not reposting about past failures maybe you could concentrate, as I said in my post and you re-quoted, please discuss in future how you are going to fix todays and the problems of the future.

That is my whole point if you actually read my post rather than just quote it!

Why have you just copied and pasted my post? Was it deliberate or a "system error"?

I have said this before! Why keep bringing up the past? Please discuss how you are going to fix todays and the problems of the future. History is not there to be raked over in order to blame others, but for lessons to be learnt from it!

Well said.

Of any substance except to tell a pack of his usual lies about how great he and his flunkeys are and what they claim to have done and are about to do.

What have assassination attempts got to do with his abilities, or lack thereof? PS; According to Stormy Daniels I think she would counter the last few words of your statement.

Why? What post has been made that causes you make such an unconnected statement?

A three sentence(?), oxymoron! I wonder if that is possible in proper grammar? You cannot seriously put all three sentences in the same paragraph as he is none of them.

Who/what post?

If true?

I think you have that statement back to front; it should IMO read; "Zelensky is on the cusp of losing the entire country because of Trump's and Vance's tantrum with/against him".