JimCM

He will have his day in court.

He helped fund Hamas. https://time.com/7010486/fact-checking-what-benjamin-netanyahu-said-in-his-2024-interview-with-time/?utm_source=chatgpt.com Netanyahu’s government was so invested in the policy that when Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas sanctioned Hamas in 2018 and cut off salaries for government workers in Gaza, the Israeli government delivered the money into Gaza through cash-filled suitcases. At the time, Netanyahu’s Education Minister Naftali Bennett opposed the payments, calling it “protection money” that would buy only temporary quiet. Bennett would succeed Netanyahu in 2021, the first Prime Minister in a unity government that lasted nearly 18 months. While Bennett continued to allow Qatari money to fund Hamas, one of his first moves as the Israeli premier was to cancel the cash-filled suitcases sent into Gaza.

Exactly, and there has been nothing but violence since 1948. At least Europe had much less trouble.

Well, you would say that.

Are they superior to Hindus and Buddhists?

Excellent post. Not allowing people to catch fish is a crime that makes me so sad. In some ways worse than the cleansing if West Bank, as the IDF watch the terrorists cut down olive trees, spit on Christians etc. Israel should be boycotted by all countries.

So you never read these passages when you were young/at school?

Have you forgotten your own holy Torah? Genesis 1:27 “God created the human in His image… male and female He created them.” Exodus 12:49 “There shall be one law for the citizen and for the stranger who lives among you.”

Funny, if you call Israelis human animals you are called antisemitic yet Israeli govt ministers can call Palestinians human animals on national TV https://globalrightscompliance.org/there-will-be-no-electricity-no-food-no-water-no-fuel-everything-will-be-closed-the-unlawful-siege-and-starvation-of-civilians-in-gaza/

If Israel stopped Apartheid, roads for Jews only(between illegal settlements), stopped a Blockade on Gaza, and many other basic human rights abused of Palestinians, they wouldn't be attacked. If someone steals your land, what would you do? It's a travesty that Israel are getting away with such abominable crimes.

So Hamas built the wall to keep them all locked into Gaza?

Really, is this minister Hamas https://globalrightscompliance.org/there-will-be-no-electricity-no-food-no-water-no-fuel-everything-will-be-closed-the-unlawful-siege-and-starvation-of-civilians-in-gaza/

They are slaves revolting against their prison guards. I can understand why the shout death to Israel and the USA who support them.

Do you know why they hate the Jews? Not sure what your fear is.

I want to know what you think.

Are Jews superior to Palestinians?

It's bizarre. In my lifetime blacks couldn't even vote. You would think they learned something but ...

Epstein wasn't his best friend, that's below the belt

Israel started the 1967 war, surprise surprise 😂 The countries that did not attack Israel:in 1967 Iraq Lebanon Saudi Arabia Kuwait Algeria Morocco Tunisia Sudan Libya You have persecution complex.

Pete Hegseth’s Arabic tattoo stirs controversy: ‘clear symbol of Islamophobia’

Doubt it.

Yes, he is evil.

Answer my question first.

Why is it that some Americans label Palestinians as terrorists while celebrating Nat Turner, the man who led a violent slave revolt in the United States? Turner fought against an oppressive system that treated human beings as property, subjected them to unimaginable suffering, and denied them basic rights. His rebellion was violent, yes—but it was an act of desperate resistance against systemic injustice. Today, he is remembered as a hero of freedom, a symbol of the fight against oppression. Palestinians, on the other hand, live under an occupation that strips them of freedom, homes, and resources. They endure blockades, military raids, and displacement—conditions that, in many ways, are worse than the lives enslaved people endured in early America. And yet, when they resist, even in ways meant to defend their families and communities, some Americans brand them as “terrorists.” The comparison is stark and uncomfortable. Nat Turner’s actions are framed as righteous rebellion, while Palestinian resistance is often dismissed as illegitimate violence. Both faced overwhelming odds, both fought for survival and dignity. Why does history allow one to be celebrated while condemning the other? Perhaps it is a matter of proximity and perspective, or perhaps it is the lens of power shaping whose struggle is deemed heroic and whose is demonized. If we truly believe in justice and freedom, should we not question these double standards? Should we not try to see Palestinians, as we see Nat Turner, as people resisting oppression, seeking the basic human rights we often take for granted?

Saying “Arabs only understand force” is not a political argument - it’s a sweeping generalisation about an entire ethnic group of hundreds of millions of people. That kind of language doesn’t describe Hamas or the October 7 attackers; it labels all Arabs as inherently violent, which is precisely what racial prejudice looks like. It’s especially striking coming from an Israeli, given the ongoing apartheid policies in Israel and the blockade of Gaza. You'll probably deny there are Jewish only roads and thousands of administrative detainees who have had no trial, many for years, and including hundreds of child 'hostages'. These policies systematically affect Palestinians’ lives, and framing all Arabs as “savage” ignores the context of occupation, oppression, and humanitarian crisis. Out of interest, do you think Jewish Israelis are superior to Arab ones?