Alan Zweibel

I think it's quite transparent that you want to steer attention away from something that has hurt the president politically towards a more anodyne topic.

No. Let's agree that you don't understand the meaning of the word censor, censorship, or censored.

Thanks for the stupid loaded question.

Imagine the arrogance and ignorance of those who think that harshly criticizing the President of the United States for his speech is the same as censorship.

I've got news for you. Anyone in the United States is perfectly entitled to comment as they see fit. But some people, think some speech is a firing offence. And one of those people is you. Here's what you wrote: "its fine to "not like the man" or anybody else for that matter, but celebrating his death online in order to garner a few "likes" or in the case of failing celebs, to boost their career or raise their profile is reprehensible behaviour and needs to be called out, Nobody deserves to be shot, but plenty now deserve to be sacked. Can you not tell the difference?"

Chinese cars are rapidly gaining ground in Britain, driven by a combination of factors. The lack of steep tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles — unlike in the European Union or the United States, where officials see the levies as a way to protect domestic production — means the cars can be sold in Britain at better prices... Last month, roughly a dozen Chinese automakers, like BYD, Chery and Geely, accounted for 13 percent of new car registrations in Britain, roughly double their market share a year ago, according to data from the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders. https://archive.ph/KEa5H

That's not what right wingers were saying until a few short months ago. It was all about the list back then. That's quite a pivot.

Do you believe that the Florida decision is a contradiction of what I wrote rather than a confirmation?

I wrote you must be living in a cave because apparently weren't aware that these documents were released because of a bill that Trump originally vehemently opposed. All you can do is reply to the metaphor but not the fact of your demonstrable ignorance.

More moronic comments

There's a rich treasure trove of naming and shaming of right wingers who celebrated the punishments meted out to those who made unkind comments about Charlie Kirk but now seek to excuse and even celebrate Trump's comments. Here's a link to it:

That's why Trump opposed the release of the documents the FBI has? The documents that right wingers claimed were being kept hidden and were clamoring for until the possibility of Trump being involved came up? Or are you referring to some other documents?

I wonder if there's such a thing as reading glassed for those like you, who are irony blind.

Do you know why the judge is unsealing those transcripts? Have you been living in a cave? The judge unsealed them because Congress passed a bill requiring those transcripts to be released. A bill that Trump fought for months. It was only when it was obvious that the House would pass the bill, despite Speaker Johnson's best attempts to suppress it, that Trump relented. In fact, he had repeatedly called the Epstein affair a hoax.

Given that it would be you defining what is amusing, what would be the point?

Bush may not have been the brightest bulb but he was capable of paying attention to more than one thing over the space of 8 years. Moreover, the first of his tax cuts and deregulation took place before the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. Basically, your comment is ridiculous. But, at least you're consistent.

Sure. Clinton's policies magically survived 8 years of the Bush Administration to unleash the Great Recession on the world.

What makes it worse is that he received from the Bush Administration the greatest financial crisis the world faced since the Great Depression. Obama should have refused to accept delivery?

Double standards much? https://aseannow.com/topic/1373011-firings-and-harassment-follow-charlie-kirk-murder-posts/page/2/

You really got to get out more.

If Trump actually is capable of appreciating what she does for him. What she gas going for her is Trump's well known aversion to reading (dyslexia?). So he may decide like so many ignoramuses that the article doesn't say what it's represented to say. And while she may be holding it together, it looks like she isn't doing the same for herself. Which could explain whey she spilled. Constant exposure to Trump could do that to a person.

It was the commonly accepted judgement. But it turned out to be a mistaken one much to the surprise of people like Henry Kissinger who was dismally ignorant of economics.

Sure, blame his critics and not the Trump administration.

So according to you, any deal is better than no deal no matter what the terms?

The USSR was a superpower only in the sense that it had nuclear weapons. And that's the only reason Russia might be considered one today. Even before it invaded Ukraine, Russia was close to economic stagnation. More and more, it's become an economic appendage of China.