JerryM

Thanks. Along with my pre-conceived notions.

I don't do well-what-abouts.

I won't.

Good -- so then you know how , there is a chance at around 80 he'll (g)et his claims paid if big

Only if the Government wins at a criminal trial and the defense appeals. If the fed DoJ loses, there is no appeal. Rulings on pre-trial motions can be appealed by either side.

18 USC 248 a2 deals with religious freedom at a place of religious worship -- the overall heading for 18 U.S. Code § 248 is Freedom of access to clinic entrances and specifically mentions reproductive health. Requests for home births are up, even among women with higher-risk pregnancies, and attendance at prenatal care checkups is down, said Dr. Erin Stevens, representing the Minnesota Chapter of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. The Minnesota Medical Association and other physician groups have held press conferences to warn that this presence is deterring patients from seeking life-saving care, including prenatal care and emergency services. https://www.startribune.com/ice-immigration-minnesota-prevent-patients-health-medical-care-hospital-hcmc-hennepin-fairview/601566885

Sure. But proving at trial is something else especially -- as acknowledged by the 'top' DoJ official -- there is no precedent as to whose rights may trump (verb) whose.

A federal magistrate judge found the Trump administration lacked probable cause to arrest Lemon and several of other defendants under a federal statute that a top Justice Department official conceded had never been used in the context of a protest at a church before. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/don-lemon-arrested-federal-authorities-attorney-says-rcna256680

BTW Lloyd's was first established in 1689 is a corporate body governed by the Lloyd's Act 1871 and subsequent Acts of Parliament. From Gemini AI Take 2:

Some MAKRO's have a separate red bio hazard bin.

The claim that was presented above as a CLAIM DENIED was hypothetical. And what you said was People heading for dialysis, for example never suggesting that was yourself.

From the indictment page 8: Overt Act # 14: While inside the Church, defendants ARMSTRONG, ALLEN, KELLY, [I UNDY, CREWS, and [land others led and/or joined with their co-conspirators in various chants, including “ICE Out!,” “Hands Up, Don't Shoot!,” and “Stand Up, Fight Back!” while gesturing in an aggressive and hostile manner, which congregants and the pastor perceived as threats of violence and a potential prelude to a mass shooting.

Swee'Pea was a character in Popeye comics:

Yes -- you've already said you have the nose for stinky fish.

Trump Sues IRS, Treasury in $10B Miami Lawsuit Over Tax Leaks An expert not involved in the matter said that "the statute of limitations could become a major point of contention if the federal government chooses to zealously defend the case." January 29, 2026 at 10:15 PM However, Dolman said, the federal statutes that create a private right of action for the underlying conduct require that a lawsuit be brought within two years of the claimant's discovery of the unauthorized inspection or disclosure. "Because the government contractor was charged criminally in October 2023 for the disclosures," he added, "the statute of limitations could become a major point of contention if the federal government chooses to zealously defend the case." Alejandro Brito of Brito PLLC in Coral Gables and his co-counsel, Daniel Z. Epstein of Epstein & Co. in Washington, D.C., who represent the plaintiffs, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Law.com via https://archive.ph/CXUgy#selection-3785.0-3805.175

Thanks. I am OK. You asked that I ask Gemini about WrLife. I did. And you have said nothing. There was a reference to Reinsurance which is the response to the hundred times asked on here "Well who is their underwriter HUH?

The REAL 'Melania' documentary would be one where Donald and Ms. M. sue the producers for $10 billion.

I replied once to you. The rest was to a usual suspect who likes to come up with hypothetical situations where your claim will be DENIED.

Above: you've had this for 10 years, you only started a policy 5 years ago, we aren't paying for dialysis. And that hypothetical example is unrealistic as Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is characterized by a very high prevalence of comorbidities, with roughly 98% of patients having at least one, and an average of 3.8 concurrent conditions, https://bjgp.org/content/71/704/e243#:~:text=CKD%20and%20total%20comorbidity,Table%202. And Diabetes and hypertension are the leading causes of chronic kidney disease (CKD), jointly accounting for approximately two-thirds of all cases. They are considered the two primary drivers of CKD globally. via Gemini

AI Gemini: Where the "$100 Billion" Comes From The figure you likely heard is from a Government Accountability Office (GAO) report estimating that there was at least $100 billion in pandemic-era unemployment insurance fraud across all 50 states. While Minnesota is currently being called "ground zero" for fraud investigations by federal officials, its specific estimated losses—while record-breaking—are significantly lower than $100 billion.

Well let's then hope those in your hypothetical situation can instead get an annual blood test if nothing else and have their dialysis claim paid. Fingers crossed.

That's the down side of not getting regular check ups. But I don't think that's a reasonable example that the first that you notice any kidney compromise you have to go straight to dialysis. Unless that maybe is an 'I have a friend who' example.

The refence was to the death in custody report BPA gave to Congress.

Yes. The above Gemini statement is accurate.

AI Gemini: If you are 78 years old and currently have no signs of chronic kidney disease (CKD), your chances of requiring dialysis in your lifetime are very low. Statistically, the likelihood of a person in their late 70s with "preserved" kidney function eventually needing dialysis is roughly 1% to 2% (their bold)