boganJoe

you would know, who did you vote for?

post it, share it here.

who? bumbling fools are the democrats finest loons, very low IQ kamala, tim walz, AOC and the list goes on, and most all democrats, NOT someone elected twice as POTUS.

did you like the Trump YMCA shuffle?

Unlike the low IQ bumbling fools and losers calling themselves democrats, President Trump rarely bumbles around without contingencies, backups, insightful knowledge and precision step by coordinated step of strategic and timely execution of his policies and initiatives. The tariff program is no exception. To avail yourselves of the current sent of operational constraints, the rules, laws and the "fine print" that Trump so magnificently navigates within see the references cited and attached below. In summary: On February 20, 2026, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that President Trump exceeded his authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) by imposing sweeping global tariffs, invalidating those duties. In response, Trump announced and signed an executive order that same day imposing a new 10% universal tariff on imports from all countries, effective February 24, using Section 122 of the 1974 Trade Act as the legal basis. This provision allows the president to enact temporary tariffs of up to 15% for a maximum of 150 days to address "large and serious" U.S. balance-of-payments deficits, without needing congressional approval during that period. While no prior president has invoked Section 122 in this exact manner, the statute's language appears to grant Trump the authority to do so, effectively replacing the struck-down IEEPA tariffs with minimal disruption to his policy goals. He also indicated plans to pursue additional tariffs via Section 301 investigations into unfair trade practices, which could extend or expand duties beyond the 150-day limit. Legal challenges to these new measures are possible, but as of now, they are in effect. Trump Tariffs Sectio 122.mp4 https://www.scotusblog.com/2026/02/a-breakdown-of-the-courts-tariff-decision/ https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/607/24-1287/ https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5748682-trump-imposes-global-tariff/ https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/feb/20/what-will-happen-to-trump-tariffs-after-supreme-court-verdict https://www.bhfs.com/insight/supreme-court-restricts-presidential-tariff-authority-under-ieepa/ https://abcnews.com/Politics/trump-outlines-new-plan-tariffs-after-deeply-disappointing/story?id=130338220

Didn't kamala harris win ONLY blue states that don't require voter ID? Of the 19 states Kamala won, 12 didn't require photo ID. Of the 30 states Trump won, 28 had voter ID.

of course it is, suppression of election fraud, voting fraud, cheating, illegal aliens voting etc. It's why more than 80% of all Americans approve of Save Act. Voter ID is controversial ONLY for those who want to cheat in US elections. Trump and honest law abiding Americans approve of fair elections and "suppressing" voter fraud. Save ACT makes it harder to cheat and the democrats can't win unless they can cheat in elections. CNN voter ID -2.mp4 CNN save act.mp4

Epstein is/was a democrat, just like you.

She's in the running, sort of, and if/when SAVE Act, (Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act) is passed and the likes of these low IQ failures running as candidates there is no chance democrats will prevail in a fair election.

Who is this "dick carney" mentioned by AOC? https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2026/02/13/aoc_the_majority_of_americans_are_not_ready_to_walk_away_from_a_rules-based_international_order.html

BTW, democrats are the party of pedophiles financially supported by Epstein, so be proud of the commonalities you share with Epstein.

Only reason is so they can cheat and everyone knows it and the majority of the voters support voter ID EXCEPT for the cheaters.

Of course he did, anyone with a normal functioning brain and sense of decency would do exactly that and divorce themselves from the party of pedophiles. If you haven't, what are you waiting for?

here's your pal bill relaxing.

Jeffrey Epstein was a registered democrat who donated heavily to democratic causes and hosted numerous democrats on his island. Epstein's donations exceeded $100,000 to Democrats like Bill Clinton and John Kerry in the 1990s-2000s, Chuck Schumer, and others like Hakeem Jeffries soliciting donations from Epstein, with flight logs showing 26 trips by Clinton, Redi Hoffman and 100's of other democrats. Epstein hated Trump, Epstein was a democrat financier, and he was even covertly feeding lines by SMS to members of congress mid-hearing to damage Trump. Epstein was in bed with the democrats, not Trump. Their new talking point is that Trump was mentioned 38,000+ times in the Epstein files. Yeah sure they were, because Epstein and the democrats were emailing each other all day about how they must destroy Trump. The files prove Epstein was a democrat puppeteer. No matter what Trump does with the files it will never be good enough for the democrats and Trump deranged sufferers. In fact, what was discovered was democrats colluding with Epstein to get Trump but NO ONE is talking about that. Jeffrey Epstein was a democrat. He donated heavily to democrats. 100’s of democrats visited his island. The democrats hoarded his files for 4 years, erased anything that incriminated themselves, and doctored the rest. The democrats blocked release of the New York files. A democrat judge blocked the release of Grand Jury Files. Hoffman is just one of the democrats darlings. The democrats wanted these files opened and now we are all seeing who was behind the pedophilia with Epstein. It was these monsters that the democrats have been protecting all along. Were democrats blackmailing these monsters ? Fund the democrat Party or else ? https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU08/20250227/117951/HHRG-119-JU08-20250227-SD004-U4.pdf

Do some research on your own, stop being so lazy and lets see if you can prove me wrong. Unlike democrat liars I don't need to make up, invent dumb <deleted> in the face of facts and truth. You should try buying into that concept. EFTA01660679.pdf https://www.justice.gov/age-verify?destination=/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01660679.pdf

The person making the claims against Trump is from an anonymous second-hand report submitted via the FBI NTOC, the National Threat Operations Center. reference/search: see BBC

This is a fake photo. It should be flagged and removed. https://www.snopes.com/collections/photo-trump-girls-rumors/

These "survivors" turned out to be adult hookers when they chose to party with the demon Epstein.

MAGA is a cult, all 77M + Patriots, qualifying it as a revolution now.

She should stay in her own lane and focus on her constituents instead of embarrassing herself and America with her ineptness and stupidity. AOC got asked one of the most straightforward foreign‑policy questions on the planet — should the U.S. defend Taiwan — and she completely fell apart. She wasn’t thinking, she wasn’t forming a position, she wasn’t even speaking. She was just spinning in circles, stumbling over half‑sentences, choking on her own words like her mouth and brain weren’t on speaking terms. She's basically a bird-brain in the same style as Kamala.

AOC is asked if the US should defend Taiwan in the event China invades. Her answer is a word salad disaster (Kamala 2.0) that would even make Kamala cringe: AOC on Taiwan-C-Span.mp4 Can’t wait to hear CNN defend this!

AOC once said, "We can fly to the sun if we go at night..."

Have any "victims" accused Trump of anything Epstein related? No, Trump has never been accused by a single victim. Not even a democrat paid fraud, due to fearing the horrendous revelations of discovery! Not one. Zero depositions, zero testimony, zero flight logs to the island, zero criminal referrals. Just Epstein desperately trying to reach him years after Trump cut the creep off forever. Meanwhile, a democrat known as Bill "I never had sex with her" Clinton litters the black book, the flight logs, hot tub, massage photos and the plea deal witness lists.