JonnyF

Amazing that Combs got away with it for so long. Although to be fair, this type of behaviour and attitudes have long been normalized and glorified in rap, particularly 90's gangster rap which Combs grew up around. Also, white liberals would typically be reluctant to call out such speech for what it is due to the demographic involved in producing it. The patronizing excuses of "They don't know any better" or "They know not what they do" schtick. "Ain't No Fun" by Snoop Dogg is a good example of such shocking attitudes towards women if one looks at the lyrics. Or maybe Rat-Tat-Tat-Tat by Dr. Dre if your penchant is for songs about black on black violence. I won't post them here, for obvious reasons. Great tunes though 😄.

I'd have to ask Galloway, but at face value I see nothing wrong in him making the speech. It's his opinion, and he should be free to voice it. It's not like he was screaming for the elimination of Israel or anything. The points he made will certainly be popular amongst his Muslim constituents.

Depends whether I fancied a bit of class or a bit of rough. Nothing wrong with a bit of rough mind you. There's definitely something about those council estate girls with the large goldie looking chain, oversized hoop earrings, shellsuit, Croydon facelift etc. Although Rayner might be pushing it a bit far in that regard. We all have standards. 😃 Therefore I'd probably favour Mordaunt in that 'debate'.

It could be argued that it is natural (and in fact necessary in terms of continuation of the species) for homosapiens to reproduce. Therefore in any species that requires a male and a female to reproduce, it would be logical to say that being heterosexual is a natural state. Given that around 90% of homosapiens are heterosexual, it is also the norm. I don't see anything ground breaking or shocking here.

Spoken like a true Democrat. 😃

Well let's look at the definition of normal. So given that around 90% of people are heterosexual, it would be entirely accurate to say that heterosexuality is the norm for homosapiens. Not homosexuality. No far left ideology will change that. Using hyperbole to deny scientific fact should be discouraged.

Hyperbole.😃 Galloway said being homosexual is not normal. He is correct. It's not the norm. He wasn't calling for them to be sent to death camps and trying to conflate the two positions in order to silence him doesn't change that.

I never said they were a target. I said she singled them out (in response to your post below in red). I stand by my comments. Being ginger is not normal (as you conceded above), and by the same criteria neither is being homosexual. There is nothing wrong with being either, but neither are "the norm". Galloway was well within his rights to state something that is factually correct. The attempts to silence him are misguided. We must stand against those who try to control what we can and cannot say.

Always good to hear the brilliant insight of an impartial political commentator like the radical leftist Owen Jones. 😆 Sounds like a dull affair between 2 dull politicans. Should have invited Farage, at least it would have been interesting.

She singled them out, in order to make a point.

If the cap fits...

It's a shame he wasn't working for the Met Police under Khan. He'd probably have been up for promotion to a senior position. Just another example of the anti-semitism that is rife in the British Police Force. As if we needed one.

Another example of the October 7th attacks having the desired effect. Looks like terrorism pays after all. Very sad.

Good to see she's a fully paid up member of the #bekind club. 😃 Wouldn't expect any less...

Absolutely. Offering someone 10 grammes is clearly dealing, not personal use. But let's not make the mistake of assuming Hunter Biden is a normal person. Or that this is a normal trial. He is the son of the President, and this trial is designed to be used by Democrats as evidence that the Trump conviction wasn't politically motivated to discredit the opposition, which of course it was. I would expect a conviction on the most minor charges, followed by an incredibly light sentence (maybe some community service and some rehab). They want to point to (ostensible) impartiality, but they don't want the son of the President to actually pay for his crimes like an ordinary citizen would.

Another strawman. I simply said he hasn't yet been convicted. Why are you babbling on about juries? Everyong knows a jury will decide. 😄

When climbing down a badgers hole, it's best to pack your Bovril lest Rain Man hates Marmite.

Of course. My point stands, he has not been convicted yet. I didn't mention anything about Jury or Government convicting. Are you creating strawmen again? Or just confused?

Another #bekind leftist showing their respect for democratic process. 😃 Sky News reported on it and their line was how this incident shows as a reminder of what a divisive character Farage is. Yes, let's pin this on Farage. I remember last time this happened to Farage and lefty comedian Jo Brand joked how it should have been acid that was thrown (on the BBC's very own Radio 4 of course). Great to see licence payers money being used for good. Lovely people.

I would agree. Trump is a poor candidate. The only reason he will win (as it stands) is because he is standing against Biden.

You're just embarrassing yourself now. May I recommend an app called Grammarly? I guess I shouldn't be surprised at such drivel from someone who chooses a username after an executed member of the IRA with links to Nazi Germany. 😃

Every time they say it they simply remind people that they are trying to make political mileage of the hatchet job that was done on him. "Convicted felon" will unite his supporters just as much as Hillary's "deplorables" did. Maybe more. It's going to backfire bigtime.

Amusing how the #bekind leftists are always the ones throwing around vitriolic insults 😃. The mask slips so often. They are exactly what they accuse you of being.

Hey Pleb Forever, good to see you following me around again.😄 Labelling people Trumpers when they have said for years they do not support him only shows your lack of intellect, or perhaps trolling.

Tried, not yet convicted. Not really. As I and others have said, this is simply a move which will be used to claim inpartiality, It's good to see you're already using that line before he's even been convicted. The fact Joe got away with the "I forgot" excuse shows what is happening here, not the fact that his son is finally being tried after years of gun/drug/prostitution use, some of which he even filmed.