Jump to content

newatthis

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    2,108
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by newatthis

  1. 8 minutes ago, ChipButty said:

    If they dont pay them refunds I dint think anyone will be booking with Thai in the near future

    Sadly, I don't believe passenger tickets are preferential creditors. According to the other paper, a THAI spokesman said there will be refunds in about 6 months. But, of course, it all comes down to the Administrator.

    • Like 2
  2. 18 hours ago, unamazedloso said:

    Who cares what Thaksin thinks? Isn't he a criminal like his sister? Typical greedy nature.

    Like you and I he's entitled to his opinion..

    ThaiVisa even publishes Prayut's ( & Steven100's) opinion, so they can publish Thaksin's opinion.

    • Like 2
  3. 8 hours ago, steven100 said:

    we all know TG is a huge failure, it seems debt & failure runs in the airline industry :

    Virgin Australia airlines LLC servicing Australia is now in voluntary administration.

    The company was asking for A$1.4 Billion ( 28 billion baht ) from the government, 

    The company debt is A$7 Billion ( 143 Billion baht )  owed to 12,000 creditors .....  12,000 !!!

    so just putting that into perspective .....  that is scary  !!   yikes.

    Hopefully, the Aussie government will treat it in the same way as Ansett. Governments can't afford to keep bailing out failing companies.

  4. 2 hours ago, Logosone said:

    Why don't you show us the study which proves that wearing a face mask reduces transmission or deaths related to SARS Cov2? The one which no doubt informs Boris Johnson's impeccable scientific approach, that is in no way underpinned by experts too busy with surveying OK Cupid for women.

    Because I don't have to.

    You presented an argument based on a published article.

     

    2 hours ago, newatthis said:

    "We found that closure of education facilities, prohibiting mass gatherings and closure of some non-essential businesses were associated with reduced incidence whereas stay at home orders, closure of all non-businesses and requiring the wearing of facemasks or coverings in public was not associated with any independent additional impact. Our results could help inform strategies for coming out of lockdown."

     

    https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.01.20088260v1

    All I did was to present the pre-amble from the article:

     

    From the article:

    This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice.

     

    You presented this article as a fact to back-up your argument, but you completely ignored the fact stated in the preamble "and so should not be used to guide clinical practice."

  5. 55 minutes ago, Logosone said:

    "We found that closure of education facilities, prohibiting mass gatherings and closure of some non-essential businesses were associated with reduced incidence whereas stay at home orders, closure of all non-businesses and requiring the wearing of facemasks or coverings in public was not associated with any independent additional impact. Our results could help inform strategies for coming out of lockdown."

     

    https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.01.20088260v1

    From the article:

    This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  6. 16 hours ago, DrTuner said:

    Here's a strategy: fill the ¤#%¤#%% reservoirs first and then start to distribute. The cause for empty reservoirs is that they didn't fill them in 2019. In other words, keep the valves nearly shut until we've got the ponds full.

    They accomplished the filling back in 2011. Their problem is that they're not able to distribute / release rationally.

  7. 15 hours ago, sucit said:

    In other words, more people will want to go to places like Italy or New York, because they have a very high % of people with antibodies and your chances of infection would be very low (hint, good time to stay away from other tourists in these cases). 

    Since when is there definite proof that covid-19 antibodies give immunity from the spread or prevention of the virus.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...