Jump to content

RogueLeader

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    672
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by RogueLeader

  1. Yes and if you want a visa from the Thai embassy you have to go there first , stand in the qeueu for an hour, bring much paperwork, come back 3 days later (travel 200 km again) and get your visa.

    Hence people would rather pay 1000 extra.

    But South American country's don't make so many problems and are much cheaper so that's where the Europeans will go.

    South America for sure not!!wink.png Laos, Cambodia or Vietnam

    Laos is landlocked, severely criminalises relationships between Laos and foreigners and most of the hiking land is off-limits due to 'land mines' so unsuitable for most European holidays and Cambodia still has a (partly deserved) fearsome reputation for violent crime. Vietnam: maybe once, but despite the natural beauty of the landscape, the dirt-cheap booze and the endlessly surprising food, Vietnam is a hard country to visit because of the greed of its tourist sector. Thailand has always been the big draw.

    Southeast Asia in general will be hurt Thailand's greed.

    I'm also guessing that the Chinese government has enough clout in the region to negotiate an exemption for Chinese tourists.

  2. Muslim women wear their veil for religious reasons.Will he now bring into law that sikhs remove their turbans or for safety's sake make them wear crash helmets.Why is this allowed?Because of a sikhs religious reasons....Unfair and discriminatory.

    I would have to agree. It's inappropriate to apply these rules only to Muslims. The implication is that only Muslims are the heart of darkness. It should apply to everyone regardless of race or belief.

    You'd like to be threatened with imprisonment for wearing a hood or a bandana in public?

  3. Muslim women wear their veil for religious reasons.Will he now bring into law that sikhs remove their turbans or for safety's sake make them wear crash helmets.Why is this allowed?Because of a sikhs religious reasons....Unfair and discriminatory.

    The thing is that wearing a veil covers the woman's face thus make it impossible to recognize her according to an ID. As it is now, ANyONE can wear a veil and use someone else's ID / driver license etc'

    I don't think there's a problem in saying "If you cannot establish your identity, you can't have a driving licence or a passport. The choice is yours."

    Forcing people to show their faces in public is symptomatic of a worrying trend in government.

  4. It's a smokescreen for his chancellor's clownish handling of the economy and viscous attacks on public services, especially the NHS.

    I would fight with every ounce of strength any law which required people to show their faces underthreat of violence or imprisonment when not it is not explicitly required, eg to confirm their identity in court or at an airport.

  5. Policing 101. Do a round up and fine those detained a massive Bt. 100 for being ' undesirables '. Who decides what an undesirable is other then the BIB at the time ?

    Will the PM be giving out ' rewards ' for another excellent piece of police work ?

    They've already had their reward: 5000 baht of it.

    Hey, isn't Songkhran coming up?

    • Like 1
  6. I have a novel Idea. Why not just legalize gambling and open some casinos in Thailand

    All the tourist areas sans Bangkok. It will generate tremendous revenue for Thailand. I know

    There are those who argue that locals will get hooked on gambling but you know they are already gambling either

    on line or with illegal forms of gaming in the country. So bring it under control and that way you can also control gamblers

    Bar the ones that are having problems from the casinos.

    I think this is a win win for everyone. Have tax revenues to go to real causes that need to be looked after

    Because that would expose the dirty secret of the gaming industry: that, like the booze industry, the bulk of their profits come from addicts.

  7. I'm with Thaksin. Round all the dealers and users up and rid the earth of these scum. They have no purpose in society and bring nothing but misery because of their selfish acts. Yes this won't be liked by the tree huggers but I couldn't give a shiny stool what they think.

    Yeah, imagine that. Someone freely providing goods and services to consenting, willing consumers.

    Scum, innit.

    Which other retailers do you think should be shot in the street, 1970s-Kampuchea-style?

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...