Jump to content

wandasloan

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    1,157
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by wandasloan

  1. Yeah my girlfriend is out checking out options for a new apartment now, but it still brings my **** to a boil to let people get away with crap like this, and having to retreat because the worthless owner of the apartment complex won´t throw people out when they act uncivilized.

    Well at least the owner of the apartment complex isn't totally, completely out of his (her?) mind. Everyone else in this story seems to be.

  2. It may come as shock to some, or many, that there are those of us who get along very well without Zuckerberg's monster. [snip] [snip]

    comma says a man who requires a website forum to get his message out. Irony, thou has changed thy name to freebyrd.

    post-52815-0-97004800-1401342794_thumb.j

    Also, everyone here should watch his "mouth". The patriots who seized power to direct us to a better Thailand are VERY active on Facebook, and were (as you can see from the name of the wall) even before the actual coup. If you know what's good for you, you will praise those who make the correct and nation-loving use of this marvelous website called Facebook.

    Whoops, forgot the link:
  3. So much wild speculations in this thread.

    Cutting the internet would hurt business very badly, which means it will hurt the supporters of the military and international interest, which would mean foreign scrutiny and it would hurt the economy long-term.

    nothing brings in the UN like hurting the pockets of international corporations. remember the opium war where china had to give up hong kong? that was caused by the east india company losing money by having thier opiums confiscated. so unless thailand wanna give up phuket after the CIA discovered a secret stash of WMDs then no, there will be no turning off the internet.

    Mr Derp, are you sure that it's not a bit of wild speculation to assume the CIA would attack Thailand like the UN attacked China in the Opium War and the reason the Thai army will not cut the internet is because they are absolutely frightened out of their wits by that certain CIA attack?

    Are you SURE that's not wild speculation? It seems just a... well, a tiny tad ... you know, a little.... weird?

    Yup, under martial law rigging your own satcom would land everyone involved in the cooler for who knows how long? As I said, dust off your fax machines everyone.

    *Actually, I'm mostly kidding about faxing, large corporates, medical, essential services will get dedicated networks, and other probably would be given licensed access with monitoring of some kind? Who will get cut completely? all social networks, skype, and consumers/small businesses. Cloud services will be unusable for them.

    Critical supply chains will get exemptions and keep running, as large supply chain companies are needed.

    Unless Rube Goldberg returns in person and in good health, fax machines would be quite a bit more realistic. Your plan already would take months to set up, and it has more holes than US State Department security. By the time it is set up without holes, with several million executives and staff fully trained, essential services wouldn't even need it any more, they wouldn't have anything left that was essential. Just moving all population now within 50 kilometres of the border would take weeks, not to mention building the holding camps.

    (Yes, of course you would have to, or everyone in there will buy Lao/Cambodian/Burmese/Malaysian air cards. Do you think in 2014 that people will give up Twitter and Instagram voluntarily, because some green man tells them to but hasn't the manpower to monitor them 24/7?)

    And no one has addressed the REAL communications and internet access, which is mobile phones. Anyone who thinks you can cut off some millions of phones and leave on some millions of phones, and the cut-off people would never be able to access the un-cut-off phones... well, I have a lovely lodge on a Chiang Mai mountain I'd like to sell you at a very special price.

    The army is not going to cut the internet any more than it's going to arrest everyone over five. Of course it COULD do both, it has the means and budget. But it won't. It will continue doing what it is doing, which is cut communications AND arrest surgically, invasively, as it deems necessary, and it will be ruthless in both arrests and communications cuts, and almost no one will even notice.

    Months down the road, after it restarts shooting down people in the street again, it will panic and briefly try to shut off communications (again) but by then it will (again) be too late and it will fail as it always has.

    post-52815-0-99839800-1401174073_thumb.j

    .

  4. Your posts about the army are uncalled for, whether you like it or not, the corrupt part of government is in the background, also if there is some problems as there will be, we don't have to take all this as anti army stuff most of them are not dissimilar to you they hate to admit that a diabolical government has been swept aside.

    Your last sentence is a lie------------any poster wishing to see how many likes I get can re read my posts. I DO NOT POST TO GET LIKES.

    Over the last few days one of my posts did get I think 15 likes ----here is confirm your lie. do not post to me as I hate posters that deliberately lie.

    You needn't shout.

    I presume the important word in the meat of your post is "government", because it certainly can't be "corrupt". Corruption has moved much closer to the foreground with this coup. It's true that the focus of corruption has moved off the government for the moment. We can hope it doesn't lose focus entirely and re-focuses on the clear and present corruption of those in charge, where it should be. THEN it can move back to the government (the bureaucracy) and gain more steam. And then whatever regime follows the army bloodletting this time, should it encourage corruption as has every regime in the recent past. We can hope.

    It's hard to tell from your post, but if you think the appearance of the army means a lessening of corruption, ... well, I'm going to assume you aren't that naive, but you should make it clearer so people don't think that's what you mean.

    I'll save you the Ascii and spittle. I'm an equal-opportunity corruption hater. And I know a little bit about who and what agencies are corrupt.

    .

    • Like 1
  5. I am pleased these have all been delayed. There are more important things for the Army to resolve at the moment. Frivolous court civil cases from both sides should be tossed as they are a waste of time and money.

    I agree. You can't have law, order, justice and the courts interfering in a decent society. Thank goodness for judges who see that and know their place.

    .

  6. Just go to the bank or do two ATM withdrawls. Most ATM's allow you to withdraw 50,000 a day.

    At banks there can be a limit you can withdraw in case if it is not your own branch office. At least at my bank I can only withdraw 300,000 in cash a day from other brances. If I need more I have to go to my own branch. 50,000 should not be a problem.

    I think you're wrong Mario, most banks allow 20000 baht per day as far as I'm aware and higher amounts have to be arranged. 50000 over the counter wont be a problem however (as long as you have the funds)

    You are wrong, lopburi3 was correct. The Bangkok Bank transaction limit is 25,000 baht, which can be repeated over and over and over until you reach the end of your account OR the amount you personally set as a daily limit. (Or drain the ATM, that's possible.)

    Individual ATMs may allow less because they aren't yet (re-)programmed or physically capable of delivering 25 bills. That is nothing to do with the BBL transaction limit.

    .

  7. Cutting off international sites would be pretty straightforward. Just disconnect the cables to the outside world.

    Disabling Thai websites, however, would require individual ISPs to be shut down. Under the current legal framework, I assume that could be done by a simple edict from the military junta.

    ATMs would continue to work since they are not connected via the Internet (far too insecure). They are connected by leased line or dial-up.

    However, I concur that it's unlikely unless the situation deteriorates significantly. After all, the junta has already demonstrated that it's prepared to cut off access to information with its closing down of all TV stations for 24 hours or so.

    "Shutting down the internet" is very simple for the Thai Army. They know how, they know where. They are highly knowledgeable about it, probably more than anyone in the country.

    But there are huge problems with turning Thailand into Southeast Asia's North Korea. Many very big, important businesses depend, I mean *DEPEND* on the cloud. There would be no air service possible, or very little. Almost all trade would cease. Much of day-to-day market operations would stop. And the general's wife would complain quite loudly about her Hay Day business. The army itself is heavily invested in the internet for its operations at many levels on and behind the lines.

    The answer is that "the internet" COULD be shut down, but never will be.

    A more pertinent answer: Some of it already has been shut down, and more will be. How much of it, and what exact parts will be shut down are good questions for speculation for some people, but not me. I take refuge in what the big-money TV correspondents say: "Only time will tell".

    But the bottom line here is the same as the top line up ^^^ there: whatever the junta decides it would like to happen about the internet, that will happen, efficiently and quickly just as it is already happening. If you haven't already seen this, you sure soon will, guaranteed:

    post-52815-0-06136300-1401162621_thumb.j

    .

  8. Wrong, let me clear this up for you as all you are doing is helping to get people in trouble. It was already announced that international travelers needing to go/come to the airports could do so between 10pm and 5am, but that the transport companies involved would need a letter of permission first. Quite simple really.

    Wow. "Simple" is an excellent description. Also a good description of the post itself. Let's try ACCURATE now.

    From the Thai press:

    The curfew imposed between 10pm and 5am will not apply to specific groups of people, the military's National Peace and Order Maintaining Council (NPOMC) has announced.

    In a televised broadcast, deputy army spokesman Winthai Suwaree said travellers who are to leave or enter the kingdom during the curfew period will be allowed to move to their destinations.
    Other groups include private employees or government officials working night shifts in various sectors such as factories, hospitals, aviation businesses and perishable food logistics. Exemption also covers people in need of travelling to hospitals and humanitarian workers.
    People who happen to have urgent or important errands during the curfew hours are advised to ask for permission from military officers near their homes.
    That's not quite so simple as yours, but on the other hand it is accurate.

    Actually it was a question... The poster was actually asking asking the reader, "would you let a girl go home alone and drunk?" It's not grammatically correct but I understood what he was saying.

    You may be right. On the other hand, the important person in the exchange realised it was (really weak) humour. But he didn't invite me to his party. Yet.

    .
  9. My question is this

    If i have a party and it goes late or a partier is inebriated I give them a room or space to sleep it off. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCE would i let a single woman go home alone. Curfew or no curfew.?

    That's not actually a question. Even I tried to put in a question mark and, nope, it's not a question. I admit I'd consider coming to your party though.

    I have a question, though: How much space? More than a taxi driver in the back seat, I hope?

    Also why jump in the Klong i agree that is the last place i would go.

    So, just like you, it was the last place she went.

    .

  10. Lots of stories today with (name withheld).

    I wonder how many are being created to diffuse attention from the real news> as all of our accounts are checked and double checked for lese majeste.

    Who really wants to know about 2am. Taxi drivers are going against curfew too? I doubt that very much.

    Maybe the woman was armed with a huge prawn too!

    I heard the broadcast too. Despite that, the curfew only applies to people who don't have a reason to be out after 10pm. Things are still reasonably busy all night, and main roads will always have a taxi for you. The real reason for the curfew is in case someone is a bad boy and the army can't think of any other reason to lock him up. There's no other reason for it, and in no way is in enforced against PEOPLE (not businesses) who are outside after 10pm.

    Only people who think there is one law and it is always applied would believe in the curfew fairy.

    .

    • Like 1
  11. <script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script>

    This is a mixed up report... very bad media produce.

    Who were actually accused and charged with terrorism?

    None of the leaders actually committed a terrorist act, even though Tarit tried to get them on terrorism, didn't the criminal court disagree and refused the warrants?

    At worst it was classed as sedition.

    Also the figures all seem mixed up, a very confusing report that I will have to rely on the BP for a better version.... as usual.

    Also, why has Tarit and Adul as well as the Attorney Gen all been retained? They are all mates with Thaksin, I thought this was a purge of the Thaksin regime?... Surely to get rid of cancer. you have to cut out every last cell.

    I am sort of expecting it to have already been arranged that all will receive 2 years suspended sentences. That's how it works here.

    I see the UDD mob are not being released yet..... good.

    If you are right, and it is a 2 Year Suspended Sentence, this is not the same as getting away scot free.

    Along with this sentence comes a Criminal Record.

    As to most countries I know which I suspect Thailand is one to, with a Criminal Record you are not allowed to:

    1) Hold Public Office.

    2) To be the Head of, or on any Executive Committee, of any Corporation or Public Traded Company.

    3) Refused entry into many Countries included the Americas and Europe.

    4) Refused a Passport, if this is part of the Suspended Sentence, which in many cases it is, or turn it in to Authorities if you do hold one.

    5) Keep the piece and not to commit any other offense during this time.

    6) Restricted from many jobs that require a Criminal Records Check.

    And I am sure many others.

    A Pardon may be granted after some years, but this is not mandatory, nor can it be taken for granted. .

    Tarit and Adul and many MANY others are gone.

    Goldbuggy is quite right, but for Suthep, none of those knock-on punishments really apply. The corrupt old man has already said he is retired from politics, and as the good crony and corruption supporter he is, he is leaving it all to his son - his real son, not the son of his current wife who MAY be badly hurt if convicted, although that is actually unlikely.

    All the other things like not travelling to Disneyland and not getting a job because of the criminal record - none of that matters to Suthep in any manner. To Suthep, a suspended sentence is less than an annoyance, it gives him cred with many of his criminal cronies.

    His co-defendants, including the son of his wife, may not be so dismissive of a suspended sentence.

    .

  12. Releasing those on bail, have the authorities confiscated their passports? It never seems to get mentioned. I wonder why?

    I'm not clear why no one looks into Thai law. All accused (in the criminal court system) have the right to bail. Everyone. No matter the charge. People are denied bail in very unusual circumstances, mostly flight risk or if the judge thinks the perp will threaten witnesses.

    I think Suthep is the man who taught Thaksin how to be corrupt. I wouldn't pour your wine on him if he spontaneously combusted at the next table to us. But he is just as entitled to correct justice as you and me, and the court has acted completely according to the law here.

    And I would also point out that the dreadful Thaksin person left Thailand with the permission of the court. The judge specifically authorised him (and his wife at that time) their passports and gave them permission to leave. Thaksin only lied about returning, hoodwinking the judge, who acted pretty much like any judge, anywhere in Thailand, would act, and rightly so under Thai law. He was a Supreme Court judge, you may recall.

    Suthep has no reason to leave Thailand and every reason to stay here. As of now, on those charges, he is the lowest flight risk outside of my neighbour's pet python. Even a token 100,000 baht is just a formal gesture on both sides, a step above a wink, nod and handshake.

    I can't believe I am defending the country's two biggest criminals and the often unreliable and... shall we agree on "quirky"?... quirky courts. But everything here today went down in a completely legal manner and at some point even the ThaiVisa Team Of Legal Experts just has to accept that.

    I wonder if anyone has thought about an across the board amnesty...

    Already under discussion, although only for the law-breaking patriotic military officers, toadies and cronies. Really. An amnesty is necessary because they broke the law and right after they are forced to return the country to its rightful owners and regulators, they could face treason charges unless they first get an amnesty law.

    cf: 12 other successful coups, 11 unsuccessful coups.

    .

    • Like 1
  13. A big congratulation to Gen. Prayuth Chan-o-cha on a job well done in rounding up the mess that has been plaguing this country for the last 8 years. It is very clear that democracy does not work for Thailand as the society is not structured in such a way that it can be accepted widely by all. Thailand has not matured that way. There is nothing wrong with this fact as we know that there are a lot of other nations in our region such as Singapore and China that do not adhere to full democracy but are still able to progress and prosper better other countries that does. Multiple wasteful elections have failed to bring the nation together as one, stalling the country and leaving its citizens physically and intellectually handicapped. Thais must not let the west impose their rules and system on us.

    It is time for the new government under General Prayuth to bring real order into Thailand and rid us of vices and crimes and introduce economic policies for the betterment of all Thais.There must be restrictions and there must be control. Everything is too loose in Thailand. We need a new grip now!

    Thai business leaders said this today and yesterday. They don't seem to agree with you at all, and on top of that they have thousands of times the influence you have. So these guys agree with you, have no respect for the military that will last beyond a month or so. Now what?
    "Holding a general election quickly is a top prerequisite if this country is to move forward."
    - Supant Mongkolsuthree, chairman of the Federation of Thai Industries.
    "We hope the [interim] government will be installed soon for the country's sake and call the next election as soon as possible."
    - Paiboon Nalinthrangkurn, chairman of the Federation of Thai Capital Market Organizations.
    "What is desperately needed is a government leader who is credible in social and economic fronts, being transparent and knowledgeable in finance and trade as well."
    - Nopporn Thepsithar, president of the Thai National Shippers’ Council.
    "Our first wish is for the interim government to return power to the people as soon as possible."
    - Marc Spiegel, vice-chairman of the Joint Foreign Chambers of Commerce in Thailand (JFCCT).
    .
  14. Stop that nonsense right now. If you want to be dishonest here at least get your facts straight. The coup d' etat in 2006 was as peaceful as walk in the park. Bloodless. You're pathetic, you really are.You don't even know basic facts about Thailand and their culture.

    And the end of the 2006 coup, which is what I asked? How did that work out? Pretty bloodless was it?

    ALL Thai coups are bloodless at beginning. The 2006 coup was actually popular, unlike this one. WAY more people not only supported it but came out in droves to show their support. Every one back to the early 1960s and even that one was really more comedy than blood. And all but one or two Thai coups end in bloodshed. Like the 2006 one, for example, set a record in bloodshed, the Thai army surpassing itself. I fear this military episode is going to be much shorter. I pray, literally, it will end with less blood. None would be great.

    If you're in doubt... well, that was stupid, you're not in any doubt you are filled with righteousness. But you SHOULD not be. You should be doubting yourself, since someone with much more experience is telling you that you're wrong. You should doubt. And you should ask an actual Thai person how the 2006 coup ENDED, and you will be sooooo surprised!

    Betcha won't. Bet you are so filled with your certainty you can't doubt. I didn't stay in Thailand so many years being as sure of myself as you. If you don't doubt, particularly yourself, you won't actually survive Thailand. Try a meditation class. Get some humility. You can't be right all the time, you simply can't.

    .

  15. I live in Bangkok, I have to say I feel more safe with the military on the street then when the "red guards" or yellow equally where patrolling..... remind you its the reds who where shooting the grenades at sleeping people. I haven't seen any violence yet from the army. Probably that starts as soon as Thaksin sends his red paid fraction into BKK.

    You say you live in Bangkok and you intimate (you do not say) that you don't know a single person who would, under any circumstances, oppose the army - that the only such people in all of Thailand must be paid, and none live in Bangkok but must come into Bangkok from somewhere..

    Okay. Then you don't live in Bangkok. Flat statement. You may have a Bangkok address and you may have a bed located inside Bangkok somewhere, but you most certainly, definitely do not *live* in Bangkok. Either you made all of that up, or you simple exist in cloud cuckoo land totally divorced from everything and everyone around you.

    If people protest against the government and get attacked, the red shirts did it. If people protest against the army and get killed, the red shirts STILL did it. You, sir, simply do not *live* in Bangkok, wherever you might actually exist. What you claim about yourself is impossible. There is no such place in Thailand as you claim to inhabit.

    Seriously? You don't understand what I'm saying? I'll spell it out for you:

    I SERIOUSLY wish you hadn't but since you insisted, also spell this out for me.

    If these globalist people are so incredibly good at micro-managing crises to take over the whole world, and we're all so blind to it, how come it's taking them so long?

    .

  16. Andrew MacGregor Marshall attributes the original letter to Sirilaksana Khoman, an NACC advisor, who is conflated with Thanat Khoman, a former Foreign Minister in "US backed military dictatorships of the 1950's and 1960's," who was also a former Chairman of the Democratic Party.

    Ah, an explanation at last.

    Dr Thanat (the old man) was a testy old man but a superbly intelligent one, who helped guide Thailand through the Vietnam war days, mostly for the Thanom dictatorship until the 1971 "coup against himself". Thanat Khoman was a nationalist, tetchy about it, but never anti-American. This lady of the letter is married to Thiravudh Woody Khoman, a son of Thanat. Old-timers might remember Woody ran Thailand's first BBS in the very early 1980s and was an outstanding geek and early technology writer for the Bangkok Post's Post Database section. His brother is a professional anti-American.

    The Khoman family originated from Chinese-Malays. They have a huge family spread around the region, but still centered in Malaysia. Sirilaksana, formerly just Siri, is the daughter of (can't remember first name) Chutikul, another career foreign ministry guy, who was ambassador to several countries. Dr Thanat is by far the best know of them all, and a major achiever, to say the least.

    .

    • Like 1
  17. That's all we are allowed to do here.

    We don't understand because we're not Thai, we don't love the army because we're not Thai.

    Remember all of the coups that came before this and now think of how they improved the country.

    My wife is off giving Lipton Ice Tea to the soldiers up the road, I have decided to keep my mouth shut for the rest of the coup as it only causes stress in our relationship.

    Remember we're not Thai so we couldn't possibly understand.

    Don't be a missionary. If you don't want to speak, Thailand won't make you speak. Thais will not make you sing the glorious praises of General Failure who by merely appearing on TV made Lipton Tea taste better than ever in the annals of human history. At least one country does that, and this isn't it. If you want to be a clam, be a clam.
    If you want to speak, Thailand won't make you put tape over your mouth, that is voluntary. I've lived in Thailand longer that most Thais. When I have something I want to say, I can say it respectfully, to people who will sometimes listen, some of whom might agree with me. And I have, and I do, and I most certainly will.
    I've been here for a coup or two, and there's not one of them ended without bloodshed. We all of us, I sincerely hope, pray that this one will be the exception. But all Thais have the right, even the duty, to speak and act and do the right thing. You can too, if you want. Or not, up to you. Just don't be ordering the rest of us and most especially don't think that because you have the spirit of righteousness that no one else has it.
    And where can I go to get some of that free Lipton?
    .
  18. It is the rights of the people to come out to against the rebels - who seized the people's power to favour the dem, pdrc, nacc, cc, ec, ac appointed senators, ombudsman. Chaos and hardships were premeditated and engineered by these groups and yet they carry on their insurrection activities with impunity.

    Have you ever thought with all these groups against your side maybe it's the side you are supporting that's in the wrong?

    Heh. I bet that is EXACTLY what these poor soldiers were thinking this afternoon. "Hey, they told us it was just a couple of malcontents". Hahaha. Welcome to the flash mob, General Failure. You are about to get a lot of lessons from a lot of groups. When will you recommence the killing?

    post-52815-0-08830300-1401022620_thumb.j

    News agency: Soldiers run from protesters

    Troops fanned out Sunday in one of Bangkok's busiest shopping districts and blocked access to the city's Skytrain in an attempt to prevent a third day of anti-coup demonstrations. They were soon met by a crowd of about 1,000 people, who shouted, ``Get out, get out, get out!''

    Tensions ran high, and at one point a group of soldiers was chased away by the crowds in the Ratchaprasong shopping district. By late afternoon, the protesters had moved to Victory Monument, a city landmark a few kilometers (miles) away, and their numbers had swelled past 2,000. Rows of soldiers were gathered, but troops did not move to break up the rally.

    A speaker on a military truck said through loudspeakers, ``Brothers and sisters, please use your reasons and logics, not emotions.''

    Well.... that could start the killing much earlier than usual for a Thai junta.

    Maybe now corruption will come to an end to ?

    Gen P is doing a great job indeed.

    And the tooth fairy will restart her rounds, too.

    It's a hoot to read someone who thinks the army isn't the most corrupt group in all of Thailand. Last coup they added 25% to the defence budget. And their "first priority" this week is to get the 2015 budget talks in high gear. Yeah, I'm sure all corruption will end by... maybe Tuesday at the latest? 555555555

    Was this actually designed as the comedy relief thread? So far it's better than Note.

    .

    • Like 2
  19. rayw said: "BTW I am British and used to love my country but I cannot say I do now as it is another corporate run USA puppet nation and sadly almost as corrupt as the USA too. "

    Hmmmm. The conspiracists in the US claim Queen Lizzie is the puppeteer twanging the strings of worldwide financial institutes.

    Oh my goodness how could anyone forget Lyndon Larouche, thank you so very much. And it is in the Executive Intelligence Briefing, so it must be true. Just one thing: She is Queen Betty and while she pretty much controls world finances, she's been spending a lot of time the past 20 years running the international drug cartels. Also these aren't "the conspiracists" but just a small branch. But then they would say that, wouldn't they?

    Dear Lyndon and Betty. Lor luva duck!

    .

  20. A Thai Visa Editor troll? You should do some homework instead of assuming its a Thai Visa rumour train. It actually came from an Australian paper. Actually for items coming outside of Thailand Thai Visa is a day or two behind the play.

    Edited to add it was also in that other Thailand English paper yesterday.

    Yes, a troll begun by a Thai Visa editor. I know EXACTLY where it came from including where "an Australian paper" picked it up Saturday night. This is a one-source story that has no backing, no legs. I have no idea why the ABC would use such a ridiculous story from such a well-known ... let's say "bad source". But to now, no other news media have touched this story because it IS a troll and worthless as news.

    You are wrong about "the other newspaper." It has printed no such story/item. You may have seen it printed somewhere, which I doubt very very much, but you did not see it where you say you saw it, either yesterday or any day.

    You may mean this story from "the" newspaper, not "the other" newspaper. It appeared very briefly before it was scrubbed from its website. It was never printed, but the internet never forgets. This story, too, comes from the single source of Amsterdam, and is simply a troll and rather a stupid one, too.

    http://goo.gl/VVb88v

    .

  21. Posted 9 minutes ago

    RT@Saksith: Thaksin tweeted again, saying ”as an elected PM,” he is ”saddened” by ”tragic events caused by another coup”: twitter.com/ThaksinLive/st…

    RT@2Bangkok: @ThaksinLive Thaksin is tweeting again asking that at all parties be given rule of law and respect for human rights

    I think I've said that about 15 times now. Thaksin has said NOTHING about a government in exile. Yingluck rather obviously won't be saying anything about it either. Only you know why you are sending the above in an excruciating thread in which ThaiVisa's Robert Amsterdam Followers And Fan Club insist that the Canadian guy only ever has the latest, dependable news.

    Until Thaksin (or Yingluck or Yaowapa or Somchai) or Oak or even Noppadon or even Thaksin's daughters say something about a government in exile, this thread is nothing but a Thai Visa editor's troll, supported by Thai Visa Rumour Central and the Thai Visa Council Of Analytic Excellence, which has unanimously ruled that overnight Robert Amsterdam became the authoritative voice of Thailand.

    I repeat also that I never say "never" but to this moment on Sunday afternoon, there has been no talk about a government in exile except in the minds of a Thai Visa editor and members, most of whom appear frankly to be going through some sort of withdrawal, possibly curfew-related?

    (I didn't mean to cut off your first line there. I'm sure readers get the idea)

    Anyway, another topic already mentioned that Ms. Yingluck was to be released within three to seven days. Mind you I would assume she will be prohibited to leave the country without asking permission first.

    And by the way, thanks for not answering me in the same tone I messaged you. I'm sort of a one-person campaign to stop the rumour train and it's pretty much impossible. I appreciate your civil tone, very much.

    .

  22. Actually, with the open vote buying, they would not have been legitimate elections in any other country. Literally, the newspaper posts the going rate for votes.

    You lose all credibility calling what Thailand has/had a democracy. It was a democracy in name only.

    The reality is that it's one set of rich guys fighting against another set of rich guys but one of the groups of rich guys promises to steal the other rich guys' money and give it to the voters (after taking a good cut to enrich themselves in the transfer).

    This is the reason why it's a power struggle. It has nothing to do with democracy. It's all about power. The power of the reds is to redistribute wealth to the poor and the power of the yellows is the ability to stage a coup whenever they feel threatened.

    I'm not following your alleged connection. In what democracy is it NOT about the power? You think in ancient Athens it wasn't about the power, and hasn't been about the power every day of every year since then? I don't care what system a country runs under, of course it's about the power. That certainly includes democracy.

    I would like to hear what the US Ambassador has to say about this: He calls her ignorant because she does not allow any of her staff to attend protest being held, that's SOP (Standard Operating Procedures) , don't get involved in other countries issues, don't become part of the problem, and don't pick sides.

    I definitely would not like to hear her do that. In case anyone actually asks her opinion, the correct response is "Who?" And then, "I've never even heard of him."

    I thought that the Wikileaks dump established once and for all that the US State Department knows very well and professionally what is going on in every country it works in and many of those it doesn't. She has nothing to answer, nothing to explain and I hope that's what she continues to do.

    You're right, though, in what you say about HOW the US government works, I only disagree with you about how the ambassador should proceed. It certainly does not send overt embassy officers to prowl through political demonstrations, which would yield almost no information and always risk igniting some anti-US nonsense. It does (and again, the Wikileaks material detailed this so very, very well) talk to, interview, schmooze with and generally just discuss with every person with a dog in the political fight to learn the issues from every possible angle. It *informs* Washington of what is happening, and the Secretary of State or the President decide how to respond.

    The embassy/ambassador doesn't make policy. They usually don't even recommend policy. And under no circumstances should this or any ambassador answer some one-off reporter's criticism when he won't even be honest enough to disclose why he's making the criticism in the first place.

    .

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...