rattlesnake

That's the one! Never felt better since I started taking his protocol. I know we nutcases deserve to die, but the fact is we are not, sorry, that's just the way it is.

Sorry to hear that.

This is perhaps the most disturbing thing in this whole story: personality changes. Lots of us have noticed it. This is a long video (1h40), but I recommend it to those who are interested in this issue. Reiner Fuellmich, Dr. Naomi Wolf and psychiatrist Dr. Peter Breggin (who ended lobotomies in the US) discuss the disturbing parallels between post-jab behaviour and the effects of lobotomy. Breggin posits that the frontal lobe is most likely affected. https://rumble.com/v1ub5nk-reiner-fuellmich-suddenly-changed-personality-changes-after-mrna-injection.html

It's incrediby creepy… and very far from anything even remotely sports-related.

Most kids are afraid of them and will push back, for good reason, their instinct doesn't lie.

Another good one is Barcelona 1992: big floating viruses, floating graphene and hordes of slaves under an onslaught of needles… videoplayback-99.mp4 videoplayback-98.mp4

Sorry to hear your brother is not on the same page as you, that must have been tough. My siblings are "crazy conspiracy theorists" too, we could count on each other at the height of the crisis and it helpled a lot.

Gaslighting rarely works on a "conspiracy theorist", though. Those who are prone to believing the doxa are much more susceptible to it, as has been repeatedly observable these past three years: "Your deteriorating health can't be due to the vaccine, that's impossible. You have Long Covid and it would have been worse if you were unvaccinated" is a classic. Or a cancer or auto-immune disease can be attributed to bad luck… or (and this one is quintessentially evil) bad genes, i.e. it's your fault. But vaccines? Are you out of your mind? Plenty of testimonies mention actual admonishing by doctors for simply suggesting there could be a link.

There was an eerie, quasi-morbid vibe to those displays, especially in the eyes of those partaking.

At 1:40 to be precise. I had missed that one, thanks.

The "dancing nurses" were one of the creepiest, most bizarre events to take place in recent history.

I didn't use ivermectin prophylactically, I followed the Zelenko protocol, which was remarkably effective.

False equivalence fallacy: though vaccines and antibiotics are indeed both produced by pharmaceutical companies, their similarity ends there, the latter being a treatment. Of course I will take the required treatment for a given ailment, and that includes ivermectin, though my stash has been left untouched for several years as so far I have never caught Covid.

In my first year in Thailand, back in 2009, I remember watching an execution by firing squad on TV. Drug traffickers, if my memory serves me correctly. I remember thinking "wow, now that's an effective deterrent". I wonder if they still do it, I don't recall ever seeing that again.

Always this deeply rooted idea that nature made us incomplete and the pharmaceutical companies are here to enhance us… I really hope the incoming Trump administration will contribute to invalidating this deleterious notion.

Is that the same Lancet which published a fake paper in order to eliminate HCQ and allow the Emergency Use Authorisation of the mRNA shots? https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/04/covid-19-lancet-retracts-paper-that-halted-hydroxychloroquine-trials

Conspiracy? Yes. Theory? No. Klaus Schwab lays it all out in his book The Great Reset. Covid was a "Tremedous opportunity", he claimed at the time, to basically implement a New World Order which had been planned for decades. Here is one of the many times he informed the plebs of what was decided for them: 🚨🌎 Klaus Schwab - The Great Reset“The word Reset.mp4 “The word Reset I think is appropriate” “We can’t go back to the old normal” “We will face ‘Black Swan’ events & different kinds of viruses” “All energy into decarbonisation of the planet” And let's not forget mini-Schwab, his daughter Nicole explaining Climate Lockdowns are coming, whether we like it or not: https://rumble.com/v32qao8-daughter-of-klaus-schwab-admits-covid-tyranny-was-a-precursor-to-coming-cli.html

It seemed to be one of those rare moments when truth slips out… As is often the case, Albert is a public-facing figure tasked with doing the dirty work against his will. Another quote from this interview: "So they convinced me. I followed my instinct that they know what they are saying. They are very good, and we made this very difficult decision at that time." I doubt he was in a position to say "no way, guys" and cancel the coordinated rollout. This interview is very interesting as he is essentially saying "I didn't want to do it, but I was forced to, whether I liked it or not"

Yes, we all know the sales pitch, but I found it notable that Bourla claimed not to.

This is a fitting opportunity to share my favourite Bourla quote: “mRNA was a technology, but we had less experience, only two years working on this, and actually, mRNA was a technology that never delivered a single product until that day, not vaccine, not any other medicine. So it was very counterintuitive, and I was surprised when they suggested to me that this is the way to go, and I questioned it. And I asked them to justify how can you say something like that, but they came, and they were very, very convinced that this is the right way to go." https://www.washingtonpost.com/washington-post-live/2022/03/10/transcript-wp-subscriber-exclusive-albert-bourla-author-moonshot-inside-pfizers-nine-month-race-make-impossible-possible/

You have just summarised the Big Pharma business model. A business needs long-term clients. Healthy people, from a strict balance sheet perspective, are the last thing a pharmaceutical company wants.

I am open to all sources of information. Some Flat Earth sources I think are good, others not. Call them "grifters" (a somewhat overused term these days) or whatever you want, ultimately what matters to me is whether what they say is relevant or not. My answer to your question yesterday was "For the purpose of this conversation, Im going to answer yes". Make of that what you will.

Yes I have, dinsdale (though at this point, although it is notable, I do not consider the Final Experiment footage as evidence per se).

I put "science" in quotation marks for a reason, "science" and science are not the same thing. As for the rest, my experience of debates has led me to learn that virtually anything can be refuted, questioned, given a twist… especially in written form, so I try to keep it (relatively) short. I could say lots more, give more examples, add more quotes (as you could), but you have already made your point, as I have made mine. The vast majority of those reading this thread will not change their minds either way, but I believe some nuance has been added to the discussion, which is always a good thing. In my view, Stephen Hawking did not make this observation on the place of Earth in the universe for no reason, this prominent scientist said this because, ultimately, he was aware that nothing is ever set in stone. I encourage you to reflect on that and thank you for an interesting exchange.