rattlesnake

Yeah, I wonder what would actually happen in case of an accident in Thailand while holding an IDP… Would the insurance cover the driver?

It's a disease.

I was referring to @richard_smith237's mention that an English language licence could replace an IDP (never heard of it myself).

And yet they do it all the time (turn and indicate at the same time, as if that helped in any way). If only they could learn to indicate first, double-check and only once sure nobody is on the other lane, start maneuvering…

The IDP (and presumably English language foreign licence) is valid for one year, I believe, so beyond that, I assume failure to secure a Thai licence would be equivalent to driving without a lience.

Doesn't it seem possible to you that people who know him will be looking for information on the circumstances of his accident?

The disaster was the past four years.

Okay, candide, you have the last word… Enjoy!

Ah, but as this isn't the "Off the beaten track" section, my proof is most likely to be invalidated as "misinformation", you see… No matter, this ridiculous debate will soon be a thing of the past.

That was funny, thanks!

What prevents them from voting if they don't need to show ID?

So your rationale is that they are allowed to vote, but they don't do it. Thanks for your input. It's good that Trump admin 2 is going to do this.

Please explain how that works. From the Newsweek article posted above: Fifteen states, including California and Hawaii, do not generally require voters to show ID.

Map Shows Voter ID Laws by State Blue: Photo ID required Purple: Non-photo ID required Red: No ID required https://www.newsweek.com/map-shows-voter-id-laws-state-1950691

Definitely looks like a female-to-male transgender.

As a Frenchman, I can say that Charlie Hebdo is a piece of trash, anything but funny, disrespectful and in very poor taste. Very few people actually read it and they survive on government subsisidies. Furthermore, one of the few talented artists they still had, Siné, was sacked in 2008 when he published a picture of Nicolas Sarkozy's son Jean converting to Judaism, captioned "This kid will go far". Because it was "antisemtitic", you see. So there you have your "freedom of speech".

This is correct, Wahhabism is a heresy.

I agree it is despicable.

Second result after googling his name + 'Thailand accident':

It is elementary decency to refrain from calling a recently deceased person an idiot on a public thread which their family and friends could be reading.

Yes of course he has. Is he going to jail, too?

But… but I thought this was crazy conspiracy theory… The next four years are going to be very interesting. P.S. Check out Sirhan Sirhan, a Palestinian the CIA hypnotised to kill Bobby Kennedy.

Yes, that is the explanation.

So logically, going forward, you will refrain from saying that being an epidemiologist is a legitimacy criterion in your eyes, as it is not. The criterion is being an epidemiologist who says what you want to hear.

Those really are three of the most obvious villains ever, as if to really insist and get the message through to the remaining doubters: yes, we are a nefarious, warmongering, self-serving clique and we just laugh at you plebs. As I said several times before, the "Biden" character (who doesn't look a bit like Joseph Robinette Biden Jr) has been our greatest ally these past four years.