rattlesnake

I assume you are asking me to explain what I see. I see several representations of a spherical Earth, some of them with the contraptions colloquially referred to as "satellites" in the foreground.

You claim the curve is visible at 35,000 feet. I have shown you footage of a level plane at 121,000 feet. Please explain.

"Science says…" I think this is the core issue, coming to terms with the fact that "science", and everything it entails, is just one big hoax. I have presented you with a contradiction in your premise by showing you footage at 121,000 feet where the Earth appears flat. The last guy I had this conversation with, on another forum, had the honesty of actually trying to explain the heliocentric model (rather than just laughing and/or dropping insults and leaving the discussion as most people do). After some time on Google, he finally admitted to me that it was "too vast for the human mind to comprehend" and that was why we have the "NASA experts". Delegating our elementary common sense to authorities who decide for us what is or isn't true, such is, I believe, the greatest issue of the modern age.

I think there is no ISS and it is all fake. And it's not very professional work, most of the time. Example glitch: 2FF994D0-D5B8-4482-8180-6498B2431E5C.MP4

I understand. 121,000 feet is 36 km. From what altitude do you posit the Earth would cease to appear flat and become spherical?

Exactly, the curve we see on the second video is caused by a fisheye lens. With a normal lens or to the naked eye, it would appear flat.

So your logic is that it is normal for Earth to appear flat at 121,000 feet. Here is footage of someone jumping from 42,000 feet. The Earth appears curved. How do you explain that?

Use common sense, be objective and rational. This was taken from a balloon at 121,000 feet. How do you reconcile what you see with the heliocentric model, which posits that we are on a ball spinning on its axis at 1,000 mph as it revolves around the sun at 66,600 mph, while the Sun itself (and therefore we) are shooting through space at 450,000 mph?

Was.

Definitely.

Phew!

Never heard of that and a quick search didn't turn up any relevant results. As they say on Asean Now, "can you post a link to back up your claim?"

Pretty compelling indeed… though there is no shortage of coincidence theorists here who will question your mental health for suggesting the vaccine could have anything to do with it.

Of course smoking can cause cancer. Just as lack of swimming skills can cause drowning. I would say those notions have more to do with common sense than science.

Sorry to hear about your issue. So you caught some sort of auto-immune disorder after sleeping with a recently vaxxed nurse?

Ultimately, "peer-reviewed" just means a bunch of people publicly agreed on a given topic at a given time.

A friendly reminder from 2023, since we are now allowed to say it: Pfizer Hid Almost 80% Of Covid Vaccine Trial Deaths From Regulators According to an analysis of the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine clinical trial data, the vaccine makers hid fatality data from regulators in order to qualify for Emergency Use Authorization. https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/pfizer-hid-almost-80-of-covid-vaccine-trial-deaths-from-regulators/

Here is a peer-reviewed study for you. DNA Contamination in Pfizer COVID Vaccines Up to Four Times Legal Limits, Study Finds The peer-reviewed study published this week also found SV40 DNA contaminants in the vaccines, and the researchers also determined that the spike proteins produced by the vaccines persist in the body longer than claimed. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/dna-contamination-pfizer-covid-vaccines-four-times-legal-limit/

"What appears to be the truth of the science is sociologically determined, it's not scientifically determined...In medicine, the peer-review is a sham. It's all built on sand...The peer-reviewers don't have access to the data. The drug companies own the data."

Thanks for speaking up. It will encourage others to do it, it's the only way to get the truth out and silence the deniers. If you're interested in a Spike protein detox protocol, drop me a PM.

Judging by his attitude and clothes, he's probably "French". If only they could deport these sc*mbags.

That's still not a guarantee that they won't do stupid things. How about showing a bit of empathy?

M*rons. And those are the people who call me extreme and deranged. What a time to live in…

Whoever posted a laughing emoji to your post is representative of the whole issue. That person will choose to laugh at an injured person rather than even entertain the idea that they could be wrong. The truth is too much for lots of people to handle and they will persistently deny beyond rationality, rather than face what they condoned and did. This is a well-known psychological process called the sunk cost fallacy.

His views on religion are irrelevant to the substance of the video, which pertains to the absence of curvature and spin.