F4UCorsair

Indeed, so sad.
voters should demand a shrink to evaluate the people that give kneejerk reactions like all teachers should carry guns

4 hours ago, Becker said:

So you claim to know that Mueller has not turned up anything but that you don't have any inside info of the ongoing investigation. In addition you don't know squat about the legal processes or strategic choices that could be behind Mueller not having gone for the jugular yet - right?

So I would have about the same knowledge about the "legal processeses or strategic choices" that you have Mr Attorney Becker??....giggle.

1 hour ago, Air Smiles said:

I wouldn't be surprised if Trump has orchestrated the entire story and Daniels is no more than an actor.

 

So anytime he needs to bury the real news, he gets Daniels to make another wild statement. 

So Trump is thinking like a REAL politician even though he had no experience in public office prior to being elected? 

Donald, yo de man! 

4 hours ago, Gecko123 said:

During the Gridiron dinner Trump joked about Melania being the next to leave the White House. A pretty cocky show of confidence at her expense given the recent revelation of the Stormy Daniels affair, not to mention the Access Hollywood tape and numerous women who reported sexual improprieties by Trump. I'll bet he's paying Melania money by the truck load to keep her from leaving. Why she doesn't is beyond me.

You just suggested why she's not leaving........money by the truckload.

3 hours ago, Becker said:

If you can't back up your statements a few deflections will do - right?

 

Cackle, giggle, cackle.

You know when you have them by the short and curlies....they start mocking.    You've done yourself no favors!!

14 minutes ago, mikebike said:

You do not have any idea as to how an investigation works do you?

 

If Mueller had anything on 45 how and why would we know if and how he was "moving on it"?

 

Again, no one who believes 45 is guilty of crimes was expecting this to be brief. No  one who believes 45 is guilty of crimes was expecting any information to be released until the investigation is COMPLETE.

 

The only voices stating that the investigation it taking too long and opining that Mueller has found nothing are those who believe 45 has committed no crimes.

Be serious, the rabid left had him impeached and charged within weeks, if not days, of Mueller kicking off.

You can back down now, suggesting that he probably won't be impeached, probably will finish his first term, but I remind you that many who post here said he wouldn't make it through his first month, let alone a year.

I won't be back until tomorrow, so I expect that we'll be onto page 70?? by then, with the left salivating.....still.

26 minutes ago, Becker said:

You have repeatedly stated that Mueller has found "NOTHING" to incriminate the man-child. How would you know this unless you have inside information into an ongoing investigation?

 

BTW, seems you're giggling a lot lately - rather like my little sister did when she was very young. Just sayin'.

Nothing has been published, and if he had ANYTHING to hang Trump, he would have moved on it.   If he had enough to start things rolling, the investigation can continue, while he is looking for more dirt, which you guys will contend there inevitably will be.   I still say, my opinion, nothing from 'inside' the Mueller investigation

You guys make it easy to giggle at many of your posts.....giggle!!

I recall an expression from my youth, "giggling like a schoolgirl who has been tampered with", quite funny, but probably not politically correct in 2018.

8 hours ago, Jingthing said:

I actually support mandatory voting like Australia. They've never elected anyone as ridiculous at "trump" so it couldn't be that bad!

Pardon???    Australia elected Julia Gillard, and Kevin Rudd, and two greater morons never drew breath!!!

"Ridiculous" covers an enormous range, so I'll comment on the ridiculousness of electing two people so grossly stupid, and lacking leadership qualities, of the left, of course!

22 hours ago, Becker said:

 

Nothing? How utterly unsurprising...

 

 

 

 

You're misquoting/misrepresenting AGAIN.

I do not have the inside info on what Mueller is doing, or has done.    What I have said is that the rabid left seemed to, or thought they had, or just lied, about what Mueller has found, and my response is the same.   He has found NOTHING to incriminate Trump.   My view is (no inside info) that he won't be impeached.   It's MY view, not me having access to privileged information.

The left were the ones who had him impeached, even charged with criminal offences, from the moment Mueller was appointed, and it's enjoyable to see the humiliating backdown to.....he may not be impeached.....impeachment is unlikely, etc.   I think (once again I, not inside info, or influenced by others) that Trump will be reelected if he stands, and he's expressed a desire to do so, but he will be 74/75 by then, and I wouldn't want a job like that at that age, so who knows.  The people will warm to what he's doing, and I note criticism about introducing tariffs on imports.   If he hadn't, and it had been suggested by the democrats, you'd be pouring scorn, and probably boiling water, on him because he didn't.   He can't win, but the criticism he receives here on TV is inconsequential compared with the biased press.   He's handled them very well, bypassing them for social media, and they hate it, and him for doing so.

I missed your quest to have me respond, so it's not a matter of 'manning up'.  Unlike you, I don't have all day to sit at a keyboard surfing TV, reading every post, looking for confrontation.   I come here occasionally, express MY view, and then move on to do other things.    I'm retired, never been so busy, and  the anti Trump threads, just a little too childish for my more developed intelligence.

Many of you anti Trump guys really need to get some interests instead of getting yourselves in a lather over Trump.   He's there, elected fairly and squarely, and is going to be there for some time yet.   You're more likely to have a heart attack because of your attitudinal stress than he is because of his diet.

Good luck in your endeavours to bring down the President of the United States.....giggle.

You could be right but at this point such predictions are worthless. Let's see about the MIDTERMS first, shall we? 

4 hours ago, Thakkar said:

Facts according to...facts.

 

Here’s another fact: Ellipses consist of three dots.

I don't use ellipses, just as Americans don't use tenses for 'fit'.   I use stops to create a little suspense.

Poor attempt at being a grammar cop, but when you stoop to that, you got nuthin!!

So you infer that Brexiters are much the same as Trump supporters? Welcome on board!

Ostrich comes to mind, he and his family will be in big trouble before the end of the year.

Just now, Thakkar said:

 

Its a fact.

The facts according to..............you?

3 minutes ago, Thakkar said:

 

You are conflating a range of views, expressed by dozens of people over a 12 month period in response to ever changing events as if it were one monolithic view. 

 

I can say that, eventually, we will all meet our maker. If tomorrow we are all alive, it does not mean that I was wrong and should be disregarded forevermore.

Is that a diversion, a distraction, or a cop out??

Just now, Thakkar said:

 

“Thus far”

Exactly, thus far, but you guys had him hung, drawn and quartered the moment Mueller was appointed.   It was imminent, days away, but that line has softened, a humiliating backdown, to....he may not even be impeached.   My position hasn't changed.   I don't believe he will be, I didn't then, and I don't now.

1 hour ago, Becker said:

And remind us again how you know what Mueller has or hasn't found?

Remind me of what he HAS found to incriminate Trump as a number of you have been contending for well over a year now.   You first.

8 minutes ago, FritsSikkink said:

Keep on dreaming, he found loads. 

But NOTHING to incriminate Trump.   Even you must know that??

2 hours ago, Thakkar said:

 

It’s true. So far Mueller has only indicted Trump’s top campaign aides, his national security advisor, one of his foreign policy advisor and eleven Russians accused of manipulating events in Trump’s favor—something that has never happened to any campaign in American history. But, hey, no biggie.

 

But you guys had Trump impeached, even charged within weeks of the investigation starting.   More recently it's been......this investigation isn't scheduled to finish until October 2018, then......... it could go on until the next election, and........... it's now unlikely that Trump will be impeached, and........it could be worse if he is impeached, charged and removed because Pence would assume the Presidency.  You're all grasping at straws, destroying yourselves with hatred of a result you didn't want, when you thought the democrats had it in the bag.  The extreme bias of the press, left and right, handed it to Trump, and now very little of what they print can be given any credence.   Their making.

I just don't understand the hatred and bitterness.   He won fair and square, no evidence to the contrary, yet it seems some of you guys have an insight into the investigation that others don't???    If so, please enlighten all of us, the infidels!!

20 hours ago, FritsSikkink said:

Just keep ignoring the news:

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/mueller-wants-documents-from-trump-campaign-associates/ar-BBJS7C1?li=AA5a8k&ocid=spartandhp

I'd be surprised, that as a thorough investigator as many here tell me Mueller is, if he didn't call for masses of documentation, perhaps some of it seeming to be irrelevant.

HOWEVER.....calling for documentation doesn't mean there will be anything to be found.   He's looking!!   He's been looking for over a year, and hasn't found ANYTHING to incriminate Trump.

Saved by a lack of cash.  Well done David!!

No such thing as a free lunch!!

Sent from my SM-G610F using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app