Jump to content

youreavinalaff

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    4082
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by youreavinalaff

  1. 43 minutes ago, Eloquent pilgrim said:

     

    That would be the same UK police that allowed multiple muslim grooming gangs to proliferate throughout the UK, for fear of offending a vociferous minority, would it ?

     

    The same UK police that allowed a baying mob of muslims to hound a teacher from Batley Grammar school out of his job and home without making one single arrest. That was 3 years ago and the teacher, his wife, and 4 young children, are still in hiding, having all been given new identities. Is this the UK police that you think would treat a muslim in the same way that they treat a jew ?

     

     

    No, it wouldn't.

     

    No, it isn't.

    • Confused 2
    • Agree 1
  2. 1 minute ago, MyThai1 said:

    I was hoping someone could point him in the right direction for the better sites. If I put in Engineering jobs in the UK, 95% of the responses are bulls##t, their's so much s##t out there.

    He is a teacher. I'm sure he has the intellect to separate the wheat from the chaff.

     

     

  3. 7 minutes ago, CG1 Blue said:

    What it proves is that the so called pro-Palestine demonstrators are dangerous if they are rubbed up the wrong way.

    I don't think the same can be said of the Jews in the UK. 

     

    If a group of protestors are dangerous and intimidating, the police shouldn't placate them, they should remove them. But it's easier to remove the one peaceful guy and turn a blind eye to the intimidating ones. 

     

    If you watched the video you can see the aggressive black guy towards the end talking to the Jewish guy in quite a threatening way. 

    One Jewish guy and one other guy.

     

    How many people walked past?

     

    That doesn't prove the pro Palistinian demonstrators are dangerous.

     

     

    • Confused 3
  4. 7 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

     

    Like I said there are specialist forums to discuss your parenting skills and this is not one of them. 

     

    I suggest we get back to Harry since that is what the thread is about, especially since your circumstances are clearly a million miles away from his. 

    I agree.

     

    I believe it was you that asked the  questions. You that has focused on me.

    • Agree 1
  5. 2 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

     

    You forgot to add #bekind at the end for maximum effect.:coffee1:

     

    You know what they say about people who are constantly telling people how nice and loving they are? 😃 

     

    I believe the expression is "tell me what someone brags about and I will tell you what they lack".

    I don't recall telling anyone anything of the kind. I simply expressed a preference.

     

    More exaggeration for effect from you.

     

    Something I chose not to do, despite your apparent advice to do so.

    • Like 1
    • Agree 1
  6. Just now, JonnyF said:

     

    Your behaviour/circumstances appears to be completely different to that of Harry and Meghan's, as my post highlighted.

     

    But I'm afraid if you need reassurance about your parenting skills you should probably go to a specific parenting forum or ask someone who knows you. 

    Funny. 

     

    You can't decide so you resort to underhand remarks. 

     

    You want to feel hatred for someone you don't know, have probably never met and who has no affect on your life.

     

    I prefer to feel love for those closest to me.

     

    That's the difference.

    • Like 1
    • Thumbs Up 1
  7. 5 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

     

    Let's see...

     

    Did you deny your kids access to their extended family on both their mother's and father's sides?

     

    Did you trash your (and therefore their) extended family publicly to the world?

     

    Did you write a book embarrassing yourself about your sexual experiences, genitalia and drug use, that they can later read for themselves?

     

    Did you set up a tax dodging charity using their name?

     

    If so, then yes. 

    Please reply to my comment. . Just that comment. No need to ask me questions.

  8. 3 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

     

    If he really cared for his children, he wouldn't have them living in a foreign country, cut off from extended family (on both parents sides) and denied the charmed upbringing that he was afforded.

     

    I wonder how they will feel when they grow up and realize what the selfish acts of their parents cost them in terms of loving grandparents, uncles, aunts, cousins etc. all surrounded by oppulence and public adoration.

     

    I wonder how they will feel when they read Spare and hear his father talking about cocaine use, losing his virginity and  his frostbitten todger. 

     

    I wonder how Archie will feel when he sees his name being used for a bogus charity set up as a tax dodge and to provide private jets and luxury accomodation to his grifting parents as they fly around preaching about saving the planet.

    The kids are living in the country of their mother's birth. Lillibet in the country of her birth.

     

    My wife, I and our daughter live in UK right now. Our daughter was born in Thailand. I didn't realise that makes be a bad father.

     

     

    • Like 1
    • Confused 2
    • Love It 1
  9. 15 minutes ago, crazykopite said:

    His life his choice I wish him well for the future but if it all goes belly up on him do not expect any sympathy from the British public

    Really? You know every member of the British Public?

     

    12 minutes ago, Bundooman said:

    Good riddance - hope you Yanks are happy with it - we are!

    Even with his drug taking - should fit in well.

    Particularly with the corrupt administration that allowed him in initially,

    Despite his own admission of addiction.

    Great news - less tax pilferers for the UK.

    All we need now is to stop hearing about him and his trashy wife.

    We are? Who is we?

     

    The easiest thing to do to "stop hearing about him and his trashy wife" it to stop reading the articles about them. Yet, here you are. Strange.

     

    He isn't and never was a tax pilferer.

    • Like 1
    • Confused 1
  10. 11 minutes ago, sqwakvfr said:

    This is a ChickenSxxt move. If he actually had any balls leff (Markle probably has them in a sack) he would take his passport to the Briitsh Embassy and renounce his British citizenship.  Ironically I am watching season 4 of The Crown( the episode where Margaret Thatcher is meeting with the Queen). Olivia Coleman is great as the Queen but Gillian Anderson is awful as Thatcher.  

    Renouncing his British citizenship would deem him stateless. 

     

    Why would he do that?

     

    Regardless of the hatred on this topic, it should be remembered Harry is a father and needs to take care of his family.

    • Confused 2
  11. 6 hours ago, RuamRudy said:

    Without wishing to foreshadow the trial, the maxim that power corrupts seems like it may be appropriate here. And, of course, there is no reason that the SNP should not be infected with the same human frailties other parties endure.

     

    The tragedy is that, more than ever before, Scotland needs to free itself of the parasite clutches of the country next door, but that prospect is looking further away than ever because of vain and weak people convincing the majority that they can provide the vehicle to a better situation.

     

    Sadly, the door to escaping this corrupt and massively damaging union seems as firmly closed as ever, ironically because of the allegations of corruption against those who promised to break us free of the yoke. 

    The fact the embezzled money was supposed to be used for a second referendum, it seems the leaders at the time weren't really interested in independence anyway.

    • Like 1
    • Thumbs Up 1
×
×
  • Create New...