Jump to content

GeorgeO

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    1,869
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by GeorgeO

  1.  

    I believe our eloquent farang friends have never been in need. So what is the problem if tax payers help poorer people to get cheaper food?????????

    Some of us are just insane here. 

    Is that what this policy will do? 

     

    Or, are the restaurants going to have the same people in them as the day before but now paying less for their food?

     

    I am all for lifting people out of poverty and as for people starving then of course any policy that stops that from happening is right,, I am sure everyone would agree with that. My issue with the policy is I do not see how it will work. If the government starts to subsidise materials for the restaurants then it will be everyone who benefits, it will not just be the poor. Also, it is just hiding the real cost of the food and sooner or later it will hurt the people who are struggling.

     

    Perhaps a better option will be to issue food vouchers to those who are genuinely in need. Then the government doesn't have to subsidise all the food, it just targets the really needy which will be money better spent. 

     

    This is Thailand ... if they issued food vouchers, the country would be flooded with counterfeit versions of them within days...!!

  2. Its a really nice story, one we would hear more of if Thailand would tone down some of its xenophobia. Immigrants are capable of being part of the culture if they are allowed to have the same rights and are treated as equals. Sadly I think this story may cause trouble for this guy, as the rules about forbidden occupations and work permits may come into play because of the publicity.

    Still I admire they guy and wish him all the best.

    So do I, and I hope no one bothers him...!

  3.  

    Drugs are a cancer amongst communities, and must be eradicated at all costs...!!

     

    Don't you think it doesn't make sense that some recreational drugs are legal and others (that may even be less harmful) are illegal? So by "eradicated at all costs" you accept the many lives and livelihoods lost and over a trillion USD of taxpayer money wasted on the global war on (some) drugs? (e.g. See War on drugs a trillion-dollar failure by Richard Branson)

     

     

    clear out the garbage by aiming right at the top of the heap.

     

    "top of the heap"? I doubt this guy is a kingpin. If he was he would never have spent any time in prison.

     

     

     

    the good General demonstrates that he means business

     

    The smarter way for "the good General" to demonstrate "that he means business" is to legalize all illegal drugs and get the Government Pharmaceutical Organization to manufacture recreational drugs and operate a regulated recreational drug industry. That would eradicate all illegal drugs and related criminal empires.

     

     

    You have your opinion, I have mine, but as someone who has managed to reach the age of 60 without having to rely upon what you refer to as "recreational drugs", I can tell you I'd rather stick with my opinion.

     

    Those "soft drugs" that you are alluding to are what lead on to harder drugs and severe associated problems. I would rather they went the other way and made your "recreational drugs" illegal too...!!

  4.  

    Forgive me if I happen to offend ...
    but shouldn't teachers have the said documents or be in the process of obtaining them....in order to legally teach.
    IMHO. If you are neither of the above but teach.....get your paperwork sorted ASAP.
    Consider the Inspector's words as a 'shot across the bow' and ample warning.
    It shows he is aware of such practices

     

           You are correct in what you say, but there is another side of the story. I have had several friends who were teachers, who wished to do everything "by the book" and have the correct visa and work permits, yet the Thai schools that they taught at consistently bungled them up as far as their visas went. The schools promised visas and work permits but then did not follow through and hold up their end of the deal, or they were helpful and assisted the foreign teacher in obtaining the correct visas and wp's at first but when It came time to renew they drug their feet, the teachers were then forced to chose....do they just quit and leave or do they try to stay on and teach while using incorrect visas. (sometimes the school directors actually encourage them to "just go ahead and get a tourist visa while we work on getting the correct documents for you".

             They become caught between the students and the laws in a way. Some of these teachers really love their jobs and their students and feel forced to do what they do as far as their visas go. (and no...I am not a teacher, I haven't been blessed with that ability!)

     

     

    ..."drug their feet" ...? 

  5.  

     

    And what about car and motorbike rentals who ask for passport deposit? Is this now illegal?

    At least in my case it's always been illegal. I don't own the passport, it belongs to my native country and I'm not allowed to give it to anybody.

     

    So when you leave you passport to a foreign consulate to get a visa you would be breaking the law ? 

    No, is not so. Anywaycountries do not clearly stipulate who has property of the material passport book, so we're discussing on smoke. 

     

    DrTuner is correct, apart from the point on not being allowed to "give it to anybody".

     

    My British Passport belongs to the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO), and indeed, they have the right to withdraw it if I do not abide by the laws of the country. I am not permitted to pass my passport to any authority, other than to check my details, and, if necessary take a copy. The demand by a hire company for anyone to leave their passport with them as security is illegal, and indeed, this is probably the point at which most of the illegal passport copies start.

     

    In cases where I am applying for a renewal of my passport or any visa contained within it, the relevant authority must provide me with an official receipt, and this receipt must be accepted by any official if I am stopped. The receipt is, in effect, a temporary passport.

     

    Whichever country you are from, you will find that similar rules apply.

  6. Congratulations to the People's Republic of Korea, for being the last nation to resist capitalist imperialism with its proud and happy people and invicible army. 

     

    One assumes you are being satirical; however, I welcome their attempt to strike at the heart of the USA.

     

    Their last attempt at testing their intercontinental launch equipment came straight back down to earth. With a substantial nuclear warhead coming straight back down on Pyongyang, we may see a sudden shift in the power structure in North Korea.

     

    How anyone can ever consider this bunch of amateurs to be a threat to the West amazes me; as they say, don't take a knife to a gunfight...!! If they want to start this, I have no doubt the USA will finish it in true US style...!!

  7. The last 2 para was totally unnecessary and was inserted for special effects. Senior police officer should know better to not speculate on something that has not been proven to the media and that the deceased can't reponse.

    This was your own Red Shirt Rag, not the Nation, so there's no reason for them to add those two paragraphs unless there was some credibility to them.

    I guess you are just going to have to learn to take the rough with the smooth...!!

    • Like 1
  8. Smart move by the lady, Why tell them so they will be waiting for her at the airport when she returns.

    Nice attempt at putting a spin on her obvious evasion of the question.

    The reason she didn't give a date is because she doesn't want to give anyone any ammunition which they can use to call her a "liar". That's the very reason why she has always evaded any questions on any subject...!!

  9. Seems to me that a large part of the case drawn up against her is the "anonymous accusation" of her being a prostitute...!

    She should demand that the identity of the person making the accusation is revealed, if necessary through a court order. If the person making the claim is unable to substantiate it, then she has the typically Thai recourse of a libel suit to replace her potential lost earnings...!!

    • Like 2
  10. This determination of guilt without trial is definitely not politically motivated.

    Read the OP again.

    She will be given a trial and a chance to defend herself with as many witnesses as she likes in the Supreme Court ‘s Criminal Division for Persons Holding Political Positions.

    Assuming she appears.

    The NACC could not pass on the information they have gathered from their investigations without coming to a conclusion, that could only be one of two things, guilty or not.

    Same as the police in other countries investigating crime, they must come to a conclusion of guilt before passing a defendant on to a court for trial.

    It's simply a case of semantics. The NACC is not a court, and should not be using words such as "guilty", and who knows, maybe they didn't use that actual word, but the media interpreted it that way.

    What they have found is evidence of negligence on the part of Yingluck and have recommended that she faces charges in the Criminal Court where her guilt or innocence will be determined.

  11. there has been quite a show of police at Pattaya Beach the last few days, making sure that tourists pay the money to the jetski scammers, Im quite impressed so far

    Your cynicism will fade in due course my friend; just allow your mind to free itself of the red haze that has overshadowed you in recent years...!!

×
×
  • Create New...