Jump to content

GroveHillWanderer

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    3,736
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

GroveHillWanderer's Achievements

Platinum Member

Platinum Member (9/14)

  • Dedicated Rare
  • Very Popular Rare
  • 5 Reactions Given
  • First Post
  • Posting Machine Rare

Recent Badges

6.1k

Reputation

  1. For those who think calling your political opponents "garbage" is such a massive outrage and should change the course of the election.
  2. It's interesting, I had imagined that antivenom would automatically be given, and would be of benefit to the victim but according to the research paper below, maybe not. Interventions for preventing reactions to snake antivenom
  3. No, not anywhere close to "just as much". Key facts about how the CPS prosecutes allegations of rape Also bear in mind, that as this story shows, many women do not report being raped at the time (and sometimes never do, no matter how many years have gone by) so the number of actual rape cases way exceeds the number that are prosecuted. Statistics about sexual violence
  4. The Haitians in Springfield are not illegal immigrants and they weren't "dumped" there. Many Haitians who arrived recently were allowed in under a special protected status and went to Springfield of their own volition because of the many businesses in the town that needed workers. Others are longer term immigrants who were already there. Indeed, the fact that there was an established Haitian community in the town already, was what drew some of the recent arrivals there. Many local businesses are happy to have people to fill the job vacancies they had. How Haitian immigrants fueled Springfield's growth Perhaps you can explain to me in what way it's not legal for immigrants who are in the country legally, to choose to go to a place where there are jobs for them to do, that the local population couldn't fill.
  5. Counter-factual, delusional nonsense. According to forum rules, any claim of fact is to be backed up with a link to a reilable source. If, as you claim, the UN "recognizes the former SU borders as Russia`s borders," please provide a valid link that shows the UN acknowledging this.
  6. The current administration did not "settle" 15-20,000 migrants in Springfield. The migrants went there of their own accord because there were local industries and businesses that had vacancies and needed workers. Contrary to how some might like to portray it, local business leaders were (and are) actually happy to see them there, to provide the workers they need. How Haitian immigrants fueled Springfield's growth
  7. Saying that somebody's to blame for something doesn't mean that it's their fault? I think you might need to re-check that. See usage example below from the Cambridge dictionary, for instance. Blame - Cambridge dictionary
  8. I agree with @ballpoint that it varies by location. Hua Hin is like Buriram - all you need is your passport. No other papers or forms required, at least if it's not your first ever 90-day report and your address hasn't changed. I usually do it in person since the office is in the BlúPort shopping mall located less than five minutes from my house and which I normally visit 3 or 4 times a week anyway.
  9. This is not true. Do you not check anything that you write? Icebach Sound's website never said that, at any point. Here's a link to the Wayback Machine's captures of the web page in question. Wayback Machine page for: https://icebachsound.com/press/ The very first version of that page that has anything to do with this subject, says exactly the same as it says now, and goes as follows:
  10. The article below (and many other similar ones) would seem to indicate there were fake electors. There are multiple court cases against then and a bunch of them have already pleaded guilty, or accepted deals. The cases against fake electors and where they stand
  11. A third assassination attempt after he loses? Why would anyone bother if he's already lost?
  12. I'm not sure why you just keep on posting things that are so easily shown to be false. While it's true that the many of the cases were dismissed on procedural grounds (including some for lack of standing) that's not true of all the cases. As the article below states: Results of Lawsuits Regarding the 2020 Elections The article lists, and gives the details of, "Post-Election Cases Decided on the Merits" Also, why do you keep repeating this lie about cases "going mostly the other direction since"? All of the 2020 election cases have been decided and none of them found that there was any evidence of fraud. If you think there are other cases that have been decided since, and that have found evidence of fraud in the 2020 election, then go ahead and provide links to them.
  13. You're the one who seems confused about dates. All of the 60-plus lawsuits that were filed by Republicans contesting the results of the 2020 election had already been decided by January 2021. For some reason, the particular link I posted, only talks about 50 plus but other links from the same time or earlier, mention the total of over 60. Here's one example: In more than 60 cases, judges “looked at the allegations that Trump was making and determined they were without any merit.” Your second claim is also completely untrue - none of the lawsuits related to the 2020 election went in favour of the Republicans claiming the elections were fraudulent. Again, from the same link posted above:
  14. Anyone can file a lawsuit or an amicus brief. Just filing one doesn't make it true. In fact, that lawsuit and over 60 others were adjudicated by the courts and in none of the court cases was any evidence found that any of the results were fraudulent. So it's not a question of just some random poster on here saying there was no evidence, it's literally dozens of judges (many of whom were appointed by Trump) who, having looked carefully into the matter and considered everything that was put before them, have issued official, judicial findings that there was no evidence. Courts have dismissed multiple lawsuits of alleged electoral fraud presented by Trump campaign
  15. Please provide your evidence of Trump telling the Russians not to invade Ukraine. I'm pretty confident that you won't find any, since in fact, he stated while he was in office that Ukraine should be part of Russia, and when the invasion looked like it was about to happen, he described Putin's actions as 'genius.' Hardly observations indicative of someone opposed to, or who was ever likely to try to prevent, the Russian invasion. Trump Believed Ukraine ‘Must Be Part Of Russia’ As Putin eyes Ukraine invasion, Trump praises his actions as 'genius'

×
×
  • Create New...