tilaceer

Sadly that is not available at Dasa. You could send me your copy though, that would be appreciated. Are you willing to read the book I have recommended ?

If you are basing this opinion on the findings of the Durham report then you are seriously misguided. I would recommend reading the book, "Proof of Collusion" by Seth Abramson, (Professor, Attorney, and Author) who presents in excruciating detail, (backed up with references), what events took place between Trump, The GOP and the Russians. So detailed is this book that you have to download a separate pdf for the index information. If you can recommend a book that "debunks this russian crap", I would be most interested to read it, if available. I do not want a four paragraph opinion piece authored by someone whose only aim is to protect Trump, but rather is based on indepth and verifiable information. Be warned, this is a very tough read but, in the interests of edification I would be willing to send this book to you, as it is no longer available at Dasa Books in Bangkok.

Plagiarise much ? https://www.outkick.com/analysis/anthony-fauci-new-covid-book-worse-than-expected Stealing material from a Fox owned website does nothing for its credibility.

QED

What part of this facile diatribe is relevant in any way to the reasoning behind Trump banning bump stocks ? Debating reality ? Debating with you people is like trying to have a conversation with a Sov. Cit. Talk about an alternate universe. Prattle away...

You have missed the point. I never said it was a fact, it was an alternative possibility of why Trump appeared to do something good out of a sense of humanity, when it fact it could have just been politically expedient at that point in time. Irrespective of who authored the article it just provides another perspective. It is up to you whether you feel this narrative could be applicable, but of course being a Trumpist, (Yeah, I know you say you're not), you jump in with both feet with no other agenda other than just to discredit the article. Next.

I am not gonna get into a Trump bashing exercise with you but it is a possibility that Trump did not ban bump stocks because he wanted to do something good. He just wanted to look like he was doing something good, hence his response to what his stacked Supreme Court have just ruled. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-nra-counted-court-bump-stocks-legal-rcna157186

Can we have a disable/dont show option please , really annoying on my phone and tablet. For those using the extension Adguard Adblocker on a pc you can use element blocking, right click and select "block ads on this website" then with your mouse highlight this pimple, then left click and block.

Goodbye Wade.

https://trumpdebtcounter.com

How about some other experts ? CLAIM: A case involving Bill Clinton keeping audio tapes in a sock drawer proves that Trump’s actions were legally sound. THE FACTS: The case in question involved very different documents and experts say it isn’t the parallel Trump makes it out to be. The Washington, D.C. based organization had argued the audiotapes were “presidential records” that the agency should provide under the federal public records law, but U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson ultimately dismissed the case, ruling NARA didn’t have the authority to seize the records from Clinton and hand them over. David Super, another professor at Georgetown Law, argues the 2012 Clinton case has “absolutely nothing to do with” the charges Trump currently faces. For one thing, the court didn’t dismiss the case because it found that Clinton was entitled to keep the tapes, Super said. Jackson simply ruled that NARA could not turn over the tapes as public records because they were owned by the historian and not government property. Legal experts this week also dismissed those arguments. Margulies, of Roger Williams University, said the claim “mixes apples and oranges.” “The Clinton materials were audiotapes of conversations with an historian that incidentally recorded some calls on official business,” he wrote. “In contrast, the documents that Trump kept were all presidential records from the moment they arrived at the Oval Office from other parts of the government.” https://apnews.com/article/trump-indictment-presidential-records-act-1df64502d1640076690fac52638daebf

Except Trump didn't have the authority to declassify nuclear arms documents, and one was found illegally in his possession , (document 19). He has also conceded that he was in possession of documents that had not been declassified. So, as previously mentioned, the difference is that both Pence and Biden returned the documents once discovered, and Trump attempted to retain possession of the documents he stole, (and most likely still has some).

Lenny Breau Guthrie Govan Pat Metheny John Scofield Shawn Lane

That is the only true poll, though some would even refute those results when they didnt like the results.

So that article was written in September. Here is a more recent survey showing a slight improvement for Biden, though not a lot. This poll was taken from 3,448 eligible voters. I am unable to see how many voters were polled in the Siena survey due to the paywall. Could you supply that number please ? https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4355490-20-percent-of-black-americans-would-pick-someone-else-instead-of-biden-trump-poll/

"Most folk" would be wrong, just like most folks think declaring bankruptcy to avoid paying debts is "good business". It's illegal, and if caught there are penalties, irrespective of who commits the fraud. The adage, "Oh everyone cheats on their taxes, so its ok", might be accepted but, if you are caught, expect no mercy.

If you even bothered to read the article you would discover that inflating his wealth had nothing to do with his over inflated ego but :- "to pay lower taxes and improve its insurance coverage. James is seeking $250 million in financial penalties". But no, rather than educate yourself, you throw out a fatuous opinion and follow that up with unsupported claims about someone else in an effort, once again, to justify your support for Trump. No wonder Trump can grift his supporters so easily.

You still talking about the toilet ????

Funny how Trumpers never mention that Pence also had classified documents.

QED

It would not be surprising that the large number of comments in a Trump article could be due to the fact that the Trumper/Maga/Qanon/Sovcits members continually post such bizarre trolling posts, conspiracy theories, opinions posing as facts, deflections and and “whatabout” Biden posts, that the more informed feels obliged to offer detailed lucid responses pointing out their misconceptions. But, it doesn’t stop there, because when the medication kicks in on another Trumper, they rinse and repeat and off we go again. imop

Judge Cannon: White woman appointed by Trump. You gonna b!tch about that as well ?

By any chance is that the person I referenced in my post ? If so, that is very disappointing.

Do you have any idea the amount of damage introduced species do to the native species and habitats of these countries ? Rats, feral cats, rabbits, carp, foxes, water buffaloes, camels, horses, cane toads, goats. pigs not to mention introduced invasive plant species such as blackberries, thistle and prickly pear etc . Australia and NZ aside, look at the problems associated with reticulated pythons and the Tegu lizards in Florida. Yeah, she knows more than the "creator"......or you. Do some research before posting tripe.

That's weird. Fixing the crack is not so hard, but there is a possibility it could open again. Gonna presume you didn't drop it or most likely you would be needing a headstock repair, so maybe timber movement is the culprit. I have seen cracks like that running down from a neck pocket, but not in the middle of the body. To repair, you just cut two boards to the contour of the sg on either side at that point, then cover those edges with cork or leather, and ensure the out edges of the boards are parallel with one another. Using either a syringe, brush or air get as much titebond three in there as you can, and slowly bring together with a sash cramp across the two boards. If the joint looks like it is opening again you might have to insert a spline across the crack. This will involve routing and refinishing.