tilaceer

Please point out what you consider childish in my post.

and the bullet was photographed There is no proof that a bullet caused that air movement. There was plenty of debris flying through the air as my previous post discussed, it did not have to be a teleprompter.

Did you fail repartee at Trump University ? Talk about send in the clowns. Why do Maga's think that childish one liners and infantile emojis help their cause ? Kinda sad really...Oh and before you start, (incase you do), I am not a Biden supporter, a dem or even American, so you don't need to try and say something stupid about Biden or his supporters. I, (like many others), used to wonder how anyone with any common sense or humanity could support someone like Trump, then after reading comments on here, I finally understood....scary...

" AN just perpetuates the attempted assassination of Trump like it's fiction. " Nobody is denying there was an assassination attempt. What is being discussed is what caused the cut on Trumps ear. Considering the lack of facts either way, (especially any pointing to a bullet), it is a reasonable topic to debate considering how Trump and his followers are using this as a way of building him up to gain more support, (donations). The photo, (taken at 1/8000 of a sec), does not identify a bullet but possibly shows the displacement of air due to a projectile. It is inconclusive. What does support the theory that it was debris, is posted below. It wouldn't matter what it was if Trump and his acolytes weren't so pig headed in saying it was a bullet.

Why do you think attacking Biden abrogates anything I have said about Trump ? You sure have the thought processes to qualify as a MAGA cultist.

Your contributions are simply too infantile to respond to.

Maybe it slipped of the makeup ??

Interesting video detailing how George Conway is putting his money where his mouth is by creating the Anti-Psychopath PAC which, along with renowned psychologists, will try and educate those who are not cultists about Trumps insanity.

I think it more likely that Trump took a piece of plastic or metal, (and not for democracy). Trump refuses to release the medical records of the incident, (just like his "bonespurs). Why would that be ? Possibly because the details might point to something other than a bullet that caused the graze that didn't need stitches or sutures. Indeed he only needed a small band aid for the cut. Trump, being the braggard that he is, gets more mileage by being shot rather than a slight nick by a piece of flying plastic, and his cult fall for it. The graphic I have loaded gives more weight to it actually being flying plastic or metal than an actual bullet, so the debate con continue. I cannot link the article as you have to be in the USA to view the webpage and I do not use VPN. BTW, I just loved the pictures of his cult members wearing sanitary napkins on their heads in support of Trump. Original source of the WPXI article.

Blah blah blah blah. Substitute the word Trump for Biden and the your fatuous comments are just as applicable, if not more so. You lot are so childish with your facile comments.

Unfounded rubbish....again. Do you really believe that some "imaginary cabal" influenced Biden to these publish these comments on Twitter ? Nearly 30 minutes after he delivered the news that he was folding his campaign, Biden threw his support behind Harris. “Today I want to offer my full support and endorsement for Kamala to be the nominee of our party this year,” he said in another post on X. “Democrats — it’s time to come together and beat Trump.”

Seems a large proportion of your fellow teamster brothers disagree with you. After the speech O’Brien conceded in a CNN interview that “Joe Biden is the most pro-union President we’ve ever had.” John Palmer, a Teamsters executive board member and vice president at large, said Tuesday that he was “embarrassed” by O’Brien’s convention speech. Teamsters’ members respond in disgust: The Teamsters’ social media account attacked its own president on Wednesday, saying “unions gain nothing from endorsing the racist, misogynistic, and anti-trans politics of the far right,” two days after O’Brien addressed the Republican National convention. Early this year, O’Brien began flirting with Trump, having invited him to speak to the union’s executive board. James Curbeam, chairman of the Teamsters National Black Caucus, denounced O’Brien’s move and called Trump “a scab masquerading as a pro-union advocate after doing everything in his power to destroy the very fabric of unions.”

She must have obtained her law degree at Trump University. Should not have listened to Clarence Thomas. Now she has finally issued a ruling, this can now go to the Appellate Court, which based on precedents, will most likely be overruled, ( for the third time). Should it go to the Supreme Court, it would be very hard for them not to rule in Jack Smiths favour as , once again, there are precedents that even Trump appointed judges have ruled in agreement with those "illegitimate" appointments Probably the most famous example of an illegitimate appointment was that of Robert Mueller.

Sadly that is not available at Dasa. You could send me your copy though, that would be appreciated. Are you willing to read the book I have recommended ?

If you are basing this opinion on the findings of the Durham report then you are seriously misguided. I would recommend reading the book, "Proof of Collusion" by Seth Abramson, (Professor, Attorney, and Author) who presents in excruciating detail, (backed up with references), what events took place between Trump, The GOP and the Russians. So detailed is this book that you have to download a separate pdf for the index information. If you can recommend a book that "debunks this russian crap", I would be most interested to read it, if available. I do not want a four paragraph opinion piece authored by someone whose only aim is to protect Trump, but rather is based on indepth and verifiable information. Be warned, this is a very tough read but, in the interests of edification I would be willing to send this book to you, as it is no longer available at Dasa Books in Bangkok.

Plagiarise much ? https://www.outkick.com/analysis/anthony-fauci-new-covid-book-worse-than-expected Stealing material from a Fox owned website does nothing for its credibility.

QED

What part of this facile diatribe is relevant in any way to the reasoning behind Trump banning bump stocks ? Debating reality ? Debating with you people is like trying to have a conversation with a Sov. Cit. Talk about an alternate universe. Prattle away...

You have missed the point. I never said it was a fact, it was an alternative possibility of why Trump appeared to do something good out of a sense of humanity, when it fact it could have just been politically expedient at that point in time. Irrespective of who authored the article it just provides another perspective. It is up to you whether you feel this narrative could be applicable, but of course being a Trumpist, (Yeah, I know you say you're not), you jump in with both feet with no other agenda other than just to discredit the article. Next.

I am not gonna get into a Trump bashing exercise with you but it is a possibility that Trump did not ban bump stocks because he wanted to do something good. He just wanted to look like he was doing something good, hence his response to what his stacked Supreme Court have just ruled. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-nra-counted-court-bump-stocks-legal-rcna157186

Can we have a disable/dont show option please , really annoying on my phone and tablet. For those using the extension Adguard Adblocker on a pc you can use element blocking, right click and select "block ads on this website" then with your mouse highlight this pimple, then left click and block.

Goodbye Wade.

https://trumpdebtcounter.com

How about some other experts ? CLAIM: A case involving Bill Clinton keeping audio tapes in a sock drawer proves that Trump’s actions were legally sound. THE FACTS: The case in question involved very different documents and experts say it isn’t the parallel Trump makes it out to be. The Washington, D.C. based organization had argued the audiotapes were “presidential records” that the agency should provide under the federal public records law, but U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson ultimately dismissed the case, ruling NARA didn’t have the authority to seize the records from Clinton and hand them over. David Super, another professor at Georgetown Law, argues the 2012 Clinton case has “absolutely nothing to do with” the charges Trump currently faces. For one thing, the court didn’t dismiss the case because it found that Clinton was entitled to keep the tapes, Super said. Jackson simply ruled that NARA could not turn over the tapes as public records because they were owned by the historian and not government property. Legal experts this week also dismissed those arguments. Margulies, of Roger Williams University, said the claim “mixes apples and oranges.” “The Clinton materials were audiotapes of conversations with an historian that incidentally recorded some calls on official business,” he wrote. “In contrast, the documents that Trump kept were all presidential records from the moment they arrived at the Oval Office from other parts of the government.” https://apnews.com/article/trump-indictment-presidential-records-act-1df64502d1640076690fac52638daebf

Except Trump didn't have the authority to declassify nuclear arms documents, and one was found illegally in his possession , (document 19). He has also conceded that he was in possession of documents that had not been declassified. So, as previously mentioned, the difference is that both Pence and Biden returned the documents once discovered, and Trump attempted to retain possession of the documents he stole, (and most likely still has some).