Honeymoon Period Over for Kamala Harris Polls Show Tight Race

[webfact]

Russia cancels release of 'insulting' film about Stalin's death

By Denis Pinchuk and Andrew Osborn

 

FILE PHOTO: Actor Jason Isaacs, writer and director Armando Iannucci, actors Andrea Riseborough, Michael Palin, Paul Whitehouse and David Schneider (L-R) arrive for the UK premiere of the film 'The Death of Stalin', in London, Britain, October 17, 2107. REUTERS/Mary Turner/File Photo

 

MOSCOW (Reuters) - Russia said on Tuesday it had cancelled the release of "Death of Stalin", a dark, satirical movie from British director Armando Iannucci, saying many Russians would find it an insulting mockery of the country's Soviet past.

 

The film, which focuses on back-stabbing and in-fighting among the Soviet leader's closest allies as they vie for power immediately after his 1953 death, had been privately viewed by culture ministry officials and advisers.

 

Vladimir Medinsky, the culture minister, said on Tuesday his ministry had received a number of complaints after the showing which had prompted him to withdraw its general release license.

 

He said he had asked legal experts to make extra checks on its content.

 

"Many people of the older generation, and not only, will regard it as an insulting mockery of all the Soviet past, of the country that defeated fascism and of ordinary people, and what's even worse, even of the victims of Stalinism," Medinsky said in a statement.

 

He said his ministry had told the film's distributor that it was inappropriate to release the film on the eve of the 75th anniversary of the victorious World War Two Battle of Stalingrad in which so many Soviet soldiers lost their lives fighting for a city which bore Stalin's name.

 

But he said the distributor had not heeded the warning.

 

"We don't have censorship," said Medinsky. "We are not afraid of critical and unpleasant assessments of our history. But there is a moral line between the critical analysis of our history and desecrating it."

 

Iannucci, the film's director, said he had not lost hope the Russian authorities would perform a U-turn.

 

"All the Russians we've shown the film to so far, including Russian journalists, have said how much they enjoyed and appreciated the film," he said. "They say two things: it's funny, but it's true. I'm still confident we can get it in cinemas."

 

'BAD BLOOD'

 

Russia holds a presidential election on March 18 which incumbent Vladimir Putin is expected to win easily. Putin, who has dominated Russian politics for the last 18 years, has put patriotism at the centre of his rule.

 

Stalin was repudiated by the Soviet Union after his death. He is recognised as responsible for the deaths of millions, from policies that included the forced collectivisation of farms that caused famine, and from a succession of purges that saw mass executions and imprisonment at an archipelago of camps.

 

But the Soviet leader during World War Two is still associated by many Russians with the country's greatest achievements. Putin has called Stalin “a complex figure” and said attempts to demonise him were a ploy to attack Russia.

 

Some of the people who attended the film's private viewing told Reuters they were disgusted.

 

"It's a despicable film," said Nadezhda Usmanova, head of the Russian Military Historical Society's department of information. The group was involved in organising the pre-release screening.

 

"It's a bad film, it's a boring film, and it's vile, repugnant and insulting," Usmanova told Reuters.

 

Elena Drapeko, deputy head of the culture committee in the State Duma, the lower house of Parliament, said she found "extremism" in the movie.

"It's an effort to breed bad blood into the social harmony that has been reached in Russian society", said Drapeko, who earlier in her career was a popular Soviet and Russian actress.

 

(Writing by Polina Ivanova and Andrew Osborn; Editing by Peter Graff)

 

-- © Copyright Reuters 2018-01-24

[blazes]

It is rare in the West for the Battle of Stalingrad to be given its proper due in the history of WW2.  If the Russians had not won that horrendous (almost hand-to-hand) battle, the war would have been won by Germany.

[samsensam]

 

supposed to be a good movie, sadly hasn't, to my recollection, been or planned to be released here.

[Cats4ever]

Ianucci is a comic genius. The Thick of it and VEEP (which I have not seen, but almost all who have, agree with my statement). Vlad is a bit of a new fangled Stalinist himself; maybe that is one explanation. I agree with Blazes that Russia's effort after the initial defeats is underplayed in the West.

Edited January 24, 2018 by Cats4ever
punctuation

[Jonmarleesco]

On 1/24/2018 at 6:09 AM, webfact said:

"It's a despicable film," said Nadezhda Usmanova, head of the Russian Military Historical Society's department of information. The group was involved in organising the pre-release screening.

 

"It's a bad film, it's a boring film, and it's vile, repugnant and insulting ...

So the group that was involved in organising the pre-release screening didn't actually watch the film before it hit the screens?

Edited January 25, 2018 by Jonmarleesco

[boomerangutang]

23 hours ago, blazes said:

It is rare in the West for the Battle of Stalingrad to be given its proper due in the history of WW2.  If the Russians had not won that horrendous (almost hand-to-hand) battle, the war would have been won by Germany.

.....won by Germany ....on the eastern front, perhaps.  But would have been a short term win at best.  The Russian bear would have come charging back and decimated the interlopers.

 

As for the OP.  I  haven't seen the film, as I assume neither has anyone else commenting herein. Yet, how can a person like Stalin be insulted?  He's already proven (even Russians admit) he's one of the most despicable mass murderers in human history.

 

What's next(?), a parody of STD-riven Chairman Mao screwing young teens while his wife weeps outside of the locked bedroom door?  

 

 

Edited January 25, 2018 by boomerangutang