What we owe to the victims in Laos 

By The Nation

 

 

Mekong dams feed our region’s hunger for energy, but satisfying that appetite need not come at a cost to human life  

 

The terrifying warning went out 24 hours earlier, but by the time it reached thousands who live in Laos’ southern Attapeu province, it was already too late. The dam that collapsed on Monday unleashed a tsunami that washed away whole villages of homes and people. Dozens were killed in the disaster and hundreds are still unaccounted for.

 

The South Korean partner in the hydropower project, SK Engineering & Construction, issued a statement saying their engineers had struggled for almost 24 hours to try and prevent the breach.

 

But one of the five saddle dams designed to confine the reservoir directly behind the main Xepian-Xe Nam Noy Dam failed after heavy rains, flooding villages in the southeast and leaving an estimated 6,600 people homeless.

 

The collapse sent 5 billion cubic metres of water, equivalent to 2 million Olympic swimming pools, gushing through seven villages downstream.

 

Lao Prime Minister Thongloun Sisoulith suspended his monthly cabinet meeting and led senior government officials to Sanamxay to monitor rescue and relief efforts.

 

The sheer scale of devastation emerged with pictures of people being evacuated from the flooded landscape and others marooned on their rooftops. Shock and despair was etched in the faces of many of the victims.

 

The disaster is also a huge blow to Laos’ ambition to turn its landlocked country into “the battery” of Southeast Asia and China.

The development goal of tapping its natural resources for energy to sell to neighbouring countries comes at a cost. Tragically, hundreds in Attapeu have paid the ultimate price. 

 

Pianporn Deetes of the conservation group International Rivers said there were major risks from dams not designed to cope with severe weather conditions such as very heavy rain. Unpredictable extreme weather events are becoming more frequent in the region due to climate change, she said.

 

“This disaster also shows the inadequacy of warning systems for the dam construction and operations,” said Pianporn, who has long monitored dams in the Mekong River basin. 

 

“The warning appears to have to come very late and was ineffective in giving people advance notice to ensure their families’ safety.”

As a major customer for the energy produced by Lao dams, Thailand and its people have a moral obligation to help our neighbour through this crisis.

 

We can start with what’s needed most urgently. Authorities in Attapeu have asked for emergency aid for the victims, including clothing, food, drinking water and medicine.

 

Soulichanh Phonkeo, the Attapeu Planning and Investment Department director, told the Vientiane Times that many victims had been washed away in the torrent, but others had managed to cling on to tree branches and were waiting to be rescued.

“We need a large number of boats to rescue them from the danger area,” he said.

 

For the wider region, this is a moment of truth for the disaster management of the Asean Coordinating Centre for Humanitarian Assistance (AHA). 

 

The AHA Centre describes itself as an “inter-governmental organisation which aims to facilitate cooperation and coordination among the Asean member states and with the United Nations and international organisations for disaster management and emergency response in Asean region.”

 

Now is the time to match these words with deeds and use this tragedy as a learning curve to shape our collective response to future disasters in the region. 

 

The energy-hungry countries of Southeast Asia must take responsibility for the local dangers posed by the vast infrastructure projects that feed their needs. With so many dams being built in Laos and upstream in China, Mekong development can provide plenty of valuable lessons, in addition to the power that helps push our economies and light our houses.

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/opinion/30350831

 

-- © Copyright The Nation 2018-07-26

One would like to think that lessons will have been learnt. Time will tell.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app

Who is ‘we’?

1 hour ago, lust said:

Who is ‘we’?

Presumably South Korea.

what they didnt say was that Thailand had a part in building this dam, that alone should be enough warning that maybe corners cut/were not what they should have been after seeing how they build things here, if they used cheaper materials to pocket the difference it would explain the failure as we see happen here for the same reasons. There is more to this than what is being said, why is Thailand not mentioned in the article as part of the  team, it was South Korea, Thailand and Laos that built the dam

4 hours ago, lust said:

Who is ‘we’?

 

They say it right in the article:

 

Quote

The energy-hungry countries of Southeast Asia

 

Personally, I disagree. The people who are responsible are the companies who built the dam and the government officials who took the money to offer the concession. I didn't benefit from the dam. I pay electricity at the marginal rate it costs to generate it, independent of type of supply. The owners and operators of the dam are making the profit, not me. If they can't build a dam and cover the risks and still profit by selling at market rates then they shouldn't have built the dam in the first place. They took the risk and they get the rewards and responsibilities.

 

It is not my responsibility to bail out a company which made a mistake just because I buy their product. I feel bad for the people who are victims, and I may choose to donate to them,  but I certainly don't "owe" it to them. The construction company does. I have unlimited sympathy for people. I have no sympathy at all for corporations and corrupt politicians.

 

3 hours ago, Belzybob said:

Presumably South Korea.

So this is an article written by South Koreans?

2 hours ago, Monomial said:

 

They say it right in the article:

 

 

Personally, I disagree. The people who are responsible are the companies who built the dam and the government officials who took the money to offer the concession. I didn't benefit from the dam. I pay electricity at the marginal rate it costs to generate it, independent of type of supply. The owners and operators of the dam are making the profit, not me. If they can't build a dam and cover the risks and still profit by selling at market rates then they shouldn't have built the dam in the first place. They took the risk and they get the rewards and responsibilities.

 

It is not my responsibility to bail out a company which made a mistake just because I buy their product. I feel bad for the people who are victims, and I may choose to donate to them,  but I certainly don't "owe" it to them. The construction company does. I have unlimited sympathy for people. I have no sympathy at all for corporations and corrupt politicians.

 

I understand what you are saying, but gonna' bet (we all) will pay for their errors, like it or not. I expect it will reflect in our monthly electric bills at some point in the future.