Jump to content

Democrats join other parties in shunning NCPO meeting


webfact

Recommended Posts

Democrats join other parties in shunning NCPO meeting

By THE NATION

 

acb72dae8ea3afa6ee0212990e3fab18.jpeg

 

THE NUMBER OF parties boycotting tomorrow’s meeting with the junta grew yesterday with Democrat leader Abhisit Vejjajiva announcing that his party also will not be attending.
 

The Democrats are the latest major political party to shun the meeting called by the ruling National Council for Peace and Order (NCPO).

 

Earlier, Pheu Thai, Thai Raksa Chart and Future Forward parties had announced that they would not attend any meeting called by the NCPO, stating that the ruling |junta had nothing to do with the elections. They have insisted |that the upcoming election only concerns the Election Commission (EC) and political parties. 

 

Abhisit said yesterday that he “saw no benefit” in attending the meeting, as the NCPO invitation said the event was being held for political parties to hear from the authorities about the next election. 

 

“The invitation said the meeting was for relevant authorities to explain details about the election, not for participants to discuss how the election will be held. So, I’m not sure if there will be any exchange of views,” Abhisit said. 

 

“The crux of this election is to allow public participation under a democratic system that sets the country’s future. Also, for this election to be acceptable it needs to be free and fair.” 

 

Abhisit also said the Democrats would not join forces with the pro-junta Palang Pracharat Party to back General Prayut Chan-o-cha’s return as prime minister. 

 

He added that many of Palang Pracharat’s policy platforms were “incompatible” with those of his party. For instance, Palang Pracharat focuses on centralisation of power, while the Democrats want power to be decentralised from Bangkok to the provinces.

 

Khunying Sudarat Keyuraphan, who is expected to be Pheu Thai’s chief prime ministerial candidate, maintained yesterday that the party would not attend tomorrow’s meeting if the NCPO and government representatives were present. 

 

“Holding an election is the EC’s duty. We don’t think the government and the NCPO should get involved,” she said. “I am against the NCPO or the government interfering” through use of absolute power allowed by Article 44 of the post-coup interim charter, some elements of which have been added to the current Constitution. 

 

General Prayut, in his capacity as head of the NCPO, had earlier shrugged off growing opposition to the meeting, which was previously expected to serve as a forum for political parties to voice their requests related to the next election. The national ballot has been tentatively scheduled for February 24.

 

Prayut, who is expected to preside over the meeting, had implied that the boycotting parties did not want to contest the election. 

Through an order issued by Prayut in December last year, the junta has been empowered to “work with” the EC and political parties in setting the election date. 

 

Separately, Pheu Thai yesterday blamed the “serious conflicts” between its election candidates on the EC’s recent mapping of constituencies.

 

Sudarat, who leads Pheu Thai’s election strategy committee, said there were conflicts involving its candidates in more than 10 constituencies, though she dismissed media reports that fistfights had broken out among some party members. 

 

“There was no violence. The persons involved only showed their hurt feelings. The mapping of the constituencies is to blame for the conflict. This problem needs to be tackled urgently,” she said. 

 

Pheu Thai secretary-general Phumtham Wechayachai said yesterday that a misunderstanding had caused the conflict and that the arguments between the politicians could not be considered serious.

 

“The incident was inaccurately reported and was over without any violence,” he said.

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/politics/30359901

 
thenation_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright The Nation 2018-12-06
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I look forward, tomorrow, to hearing about the 'useful' meeting between the NCPO - aka Prayuth and anyone with the stomach to sit close to him - and the PPRP. With all the election details to be explained by the 'relevant authorities', I can see the meeting lasting for at least five minutes.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, webfact said:

For instance, Palang Pracharat focuses on centralisation of power...

Well, imagine that...how very military of them. Just wanting the same old BS to continue and for Bangkok to decide every tiny detail of life in all parts of Thailand. Keep going backwards morons.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh well....
The indifference is quite consistent among Thais. 
Continue on with their everyday free, independent, and self-sufficient lives regardless of false standing governments. 
 
Why Farang are so terribly angst towards all Thai affairs is quite baffling. 
Their observations are clearly manufactured.
It is clear you underestimate the Thai. Happens to the best.

Sent from my SM-J730F using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, zzaa09 said:

The indifference is quite consistent among Thais. 

Continue on with their everyday free, independent, and self-sufficient lives regardless of false standing governments.

Ignorance sometimes mistaken for indifference

 

Until false standing governments slip one too many links onto the chains that bind them.

 

Has many forms...could be the new tax that lines the false standing governments pockets

Could be the loss of previously held rights or benefits

But when that last straw breaks ...then claimed ignorance/indifference finds its limit

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It appears there may be enough parties declining the indoctrination meeting to make it a mute forum. Ultimately it also appears this is all for show and the election has already been decided...not voting required. The junta is using the time leading up to the election to quell any opposition from the voting public to having their voices silenced.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...