NGOs seek slowdown of Group worries about environmental impact of speedy development on lives of local people

By Pratch Rujivanarom 
The Nation 

 

Chachoengsao//FILE photo

 

Environmentalists are urging the government to slow down the development of the Eastern Economic Corridor (EEC) in order to protect locals from environmental impacts and related conflicts.
 

The Assembly of NGOs for the Protection and Conservation of the Environment and Natural Resources yesterday submitted a petition to Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha, urging him to revoke all special laws aimed at promoting the EEC, amend the EEC Act and suspend harmful investment projects. The petition also called for a study strategic environmental assessment (SEA) and a review of the city plan and land usage in EEC provinces.

 

Ronnachai Chainiwattana, manager of the NGO assembly, said that over the past five years, the National Council for Peace and Order has drafted many laws in favour of large-scale industrial investment in the EEC and other special economic zones (SEZs). These laws and orders bypassed many environmental protection regulations, which contributed to severe environmental and health impacts on people and ecosystems.

 

Ronnachai pointed out that the demand for land to cater to investments in the EEC and other SEZs were also worsening land conflicts, especially in the three EEC provinces – Chachoengsao, Chon Buri and Rayong. He said many developers were buying up plots to resell them to industrial investors, leaving farmers landless.

 

EEC Watch coordinator Gunn Tattiyakul further added that many of the plots, designated as industrial promotion zones, are fertile farmland. So, if these lands are converted into industrial parks, the rich natural resources will vanish forever and threaten the country with food insecurity.

 

“Poor selection of land for industrial development is closely related to the recent passing of the controversial Factory Bill, which will exempt small, polluting factories from the grip of any environmental protection regulations and allow them to be built anywhere, regardless of city plan,” Gunn said.

 

He highlighted that industrial development in the EEC also ignored local people’s role and almost all development projects and industrial investments in the EEC were done without public participation or hearing.

 

The EEC development also lacks appropriate SEA studies, he noted, as every development was done separately. The same was the case of the Environmental and Health Impact Assessment study of each project, as it only focused on the scope of that specific project.

 

“The EEC has no guidelines for development that suits the region’s advantages and local people’s demands,” he said.

 

Gunn said that due to the lack of SEA, locals in EEC provinces are coordinating with academics to come up with their own SEA studies. It found that the three provinces can all be developed as eco-tourism and cultural destinations, while the fertile Bang Pakong River plain in Chachoengsao province is suited for producing food to feed the country and for export.

 

“The large-scale industrial development in the EEC is not sustainable. It will not let us achieve any of the SDGs [Sustainable Development Goals], so we should stop and reconsider the EEC development policies carefully, so as to ensure that local people get the highest benefit from this mega-project,” he said.

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/national/30364747

 

 -- © Copyright The Nation 2019-02-26

1 hour ago, webfact said:

These laws and orders bypassed many environmental protection regulations, which contributed to severe environmental and health impacts on people and ecosystems.

surely this government in all it's military wisdom has all of our best interests at heart, right ?

Difficult times ahead. On one side the Environmentalists (Stop all progress) and on the other a military junta and corporations (Moneyball). Work out what happens to all the people in the middle. 

 

Given that these are industrial projects the proximity to a highway is essential. Start out from there. 

Serious growing pains here!

But I guess that's what is to be expected when a bunch of tank drivers try to run a 70 million person country and give more consideration to lining their own pockets than they do to good sound, sustainable development.

Land development is usually handled by persons with a university degree in key disciplines like industrial development and civil engineering etc.

And in a democracy (555), local people who will be affected should always be allowed to input into the process.

 

Is large scale industrial development at all compatible with Thailands climate change promises? More concrete, more factories, more energy use. It seems to me that modern life is in itself not sustainable with the earths limited resources and yet we continue to imagine it can be fixed, meanwhile refusing to change. When all the polar ice has melted will the EEC be above water? Perhaps its Bangkok's replacement when sea levels rise.

3 hours ago, webfact said:

Environmentalists are urging the government to slow down the development

Don't worry it will come naturally when they find out their "education system" fails to deliver skilled workers to run these places.