Jump to content

Cabinet bracing for debate on Prayut’s flawed oath


webfact

Recommended Posts

Cabinet bracing for debate on Prayut’s flawed oath

By The Nation

 

800_ef85d16e05da83e.jpg?v=1566805939

 

Deputy Prime Minister Wissanu Krea-ngam plans to initiate a Cabinet discussion on Tuesday (August 27) to prepare for an upcoming House debate over a perceived flaw in the way the prime minister was sworn into office.

 

The opposition maintains that Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha did not strictly adhere to the constitutionally mandated wording of the oath of allegiance to the King when he was sworn in and is thus disqualified.

 

The chief coalition whip expects the House to debate the matter early next month.

 

Wissanu said he will ask the Cabinet to name a representative to respond to the opposition on the prime minister’s behalf and will advise the designated person on strategy.

 

Six academics and lawyers on Monday jointly filed a complaint with the Office of the Ombudsmen to investigate officials of the Cabinet Secretary for failing to prepare the proper wording for Prayut to read when taking the oath.

 

Wiwatchai Kulamart, a lecturer at Ramkhamhaeng University, said Prayut should not be blamed for someone else’s failure to provide the correct wording for the oath. 

 

The blame rests with the Cabinet, he said.

 

He said Prayut’s mistake was “trivial and unintentional” and he should be allowed to take the oath again.

 

Source: https://www.nationthailand.com/news/30375371

 

nation.jpg

-- © Copyright The Nation Thailand 2019-08-26
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, webfact said:

He said Prayut’s mistake was “trivial and unintentional” and he should be allowed to take the oath again.

I thought Prayut has said it was intentional,and that his superior told him to omit the words.

 

35 minutes ago, webfact said:

Wiwatchai Kulamart, a lecturer at Ramkhamhaeng University, said Prayut should not be blamed for someone else’s failure to provide the correct wording for the oath. 

With lecturers like this it easy to see why education standards are so poor.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I give them points for originality, but seems a bit petty and thin, even for Thailand.  Is this really their idea of meaningful opposition? 

 

Surely, there's something more worthwhile they can look into.  Russian meddling, perhaps?  Not very original, but it's a crowd pleaser.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, thequietman said:

In its defense, the cabinet states categorically that it had nothing to do with it. 

 

Apparently, it was the toaster.

cabinet.jpg

I thought it was colonel mustard in the library with the candlestick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He may well get away with it this time but many reports and comments on Thai platforms about 2.3bn in his bank accounts and why its not required to be declared and where its come from on army pay what truth there is in this one can only guess but???? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, sammieuk1 said:

He may well get away with it this time but many reports and comments on Thai platforms about 2.3bn in his bank accounts and why its not required to be declared and where its come from on army pay what truth there is in this one can only guess but???? 

If he was payed on a performance based renumeration he would owe 2.3 billion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, sammieuk1 said:

He may well get away with it this time but many reports and comments on Thai platforms about 2.3bn in his bank accounts and why its not required to be declared and where its come from on army pay what truth there is in this one can only guess but???? 

In November 2014 he declared a joint worth of B128 million in assets and B654,745 in debts. He declared that he was undaunted by the prospect of being scrutinized. This alleged report seem a reasonable increase after working hard for the country for last 5 years ????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thai authories inform foreigners to check their visa details becasue it is upto the foreigner to make sure the details are correct, because if the Thai Immigration officer makes a mistake, but the foreginer in question does not notice the mistake, the foreigner is to blame not the Thai Immigration officer, who made the mistake in the first place!

 

In my opinion the Dictator is wrong. He should have examined the speech with a fine toothed comb..

 

The speech is not simply one used for opening a supermarket! The speech in question is a very important part of government administration. All wording, context etc should be checked by the orator, namely the dictator, who broadcasted the speech to the nation.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why is this matter about the oath so much more important to argue about than sorting out the mess the country is in with, droughts, floods, high baht, road death rate etc ?  Cos they don't care about the people !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jaiyen said:

why is this matter about the oath so much more important to argue about than sorting out the mess the country is in with, droughts, floods, high baht, road death rate etc ?  Cos they don't care about the people !

Do you actually understand what is going on here?

Did you notice that the part left out is the part referring to caring about the people you are talking about?

Dont you see how this little intentional "slip-up" is the most basic part of why things go so wrong here in Thailand and how it can impact the future of the country keeping in mind the broader implications and the direction the order to do this came from?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, CelticBhoy said:

Why are they all wearing lipstick in that pic?

I don't know, but the little bloke on the right needs to get his No 1 dress into the tailors, his sleeves are too long! The slant on the hip pockets of the jacket are a bit iffy too, although maybe the angle is critical to slipping envelopes in unobtrusively...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, webfact said:

Wissanu said he will ask the Cabinet to name a representative to respond to the opposition on the prime minister’s behalf and will advise the designated person on strategy.

So Prayut won't be asked anything he will have a subordinate do it for him !!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, 55Jay said:

I give them points for originality, but seems a bit petty and thin, even for Thailand.  Is this really their idea of meaningful opposition? 

 

Surely, there's something more worthwhile they can look into.  Russian meddling, perhaps?  Not very original, but it's a crowd pleaser.

If you want petty and thin, try this:-

 

"The single case in question was filed with the Constitutional Court by Mr. Natthaporn Toprayoon, who accused the Future Forward party of being hostile to a Constitutional Monarchy, citing the party’s inverted triangle logo which, according to Mr. Natthaporn, resembles the symbol of the Illuminati, founded in Germany in 1776, which was believed to have been behind the overthrow of monarchies in several European countries."

 

Highway dept. are going to busy taking down all those give way signs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the dude really did not state the complete and correct oath, then apparently he does not take seriously the responsibilities of his office and should vacate the post at once in favour of a patriot that would take the oath sincerely.

Thailand needs and deserves a true leader, not a clown. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...