The paper’s conclusion is unreliable: it cherry-picks case reports without controls, cannot establish causation from temporal association, and was withdrawn/rejected for unsupported conclusions. � It overinterprets autopsy findings, ignores baseline mortality, and suffers strong selection and confirmation bias, making its “causal” claims invalid. Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah. Conclusion: You're not a scientist and you have no idea what the <deleted> you're talking about. 🙄