Keir Starmer’s Policies Risk Creating a Divided Economy

[Social Media]

 

The recent Budget under Sir Keir Starmer’s administration has intensified concerns about an emerging “two-tier” economy in the UK. As financial markets react to the new policies, a clear disparity has begun to surface between the private and public sectors. The public sector is being shielded from the recent increase in employer National Insurance contributions, with Treasury funds allocated to cover these additional costs. The private sector, however, is left to absorb the full impact, a shift that is likely to affect wages, profits, and job growth.

 

The effects of this approach are particularly worrying for organisations like GP surgeries, care homes, and hospices, which depend heavily on public sector funding but operate independently. These institutions face the prospect of higher costs without any governmental relief. On this issue, the Health and Social Care Secretary, Wes Streeting, has stated that he is “working through” whether social care will be granted any protection, but until these discussions progress, such organisations are left in an uncertain position.

 

In one example, Paul Stanley of the Gas House Lane GP surgery in Northumberland estimates that his practice will incur an additional £40,000 annually due to the increased National Insurance contributions, forcing difficult decisions about staffing levels. This sentiment is echoed by other leaders who fear that hiring plans and service improvements may need to be scaled back.

 

The government’s response has included tentative offers of financial support in future contracts, particularly for GP practices. Downing Street has suggested that the next GP contract negotiations may include funds to compensate for the tax hike. However, this reliance on temporary exemptions for those closely linked to the public sector highlights a troubling trend: a preference for protecting public sector workers over fostering economic growth and competitiveness in the private sector. Such an approach may also increase market distortions, especially in sectors where private firms and public entities compete for talent.

 

This selective support strategy has raised questions about the government's commitment to economic growth. As it stands, a tax increase that requires significant carve-outs to avoid harming essential services is a tax policy that deserves serious reconsideration. Many critics argue that rather than placing a disproportionate burden on the private sector, the government should be transparent about what level of public services the economy can feasibly sustain without compromising private sector health. By forcing the private sector to bear the brunt of these costs, Starmer’s administration risks stifling the very economic dynamism it seeks to encourage.

 

Based on a report by Daily Telegraph 2024-11-04