Why the Assassination of Thompson is a Bad Sign

[Yagoda]

It looks like our new Socialist hero, Luigi Mangione, is a highly educated rich kid imbued with utopian visions who sees himself as a foot soldier in the cultish belief of inevitable march to Socialism. His actions, his philosophy and his actions bring back such old socialist heroes as Vera Zasulich and Sophia Perovskaya.

 

For your own edification, and if you seek to understand things beyond zombie net soundbites, please see Giefmans Thou Shalt Kill, Revolutionary Terrorism in Russia, 1894-1917.

 

To continue, my thesis would be thus.

 

Socialism is a revolutionary movement that seeks to impose a utopian collective philosophy on humanity that is unfortunately for them inimical to the individualist nature of humanity. Accordingly, to achieve the collective utopia, all aspects of individuality must be eliminated.

 

Thus, any government based on Socialist principles will be authoritarian as it IMPOSES its view on the populace. It cannot tolerate dissent or deviations from the norm.

 

In view of the foregoing, no Socialist system can ever be imposed unless by force, or by trickery. Thus, the Bolsheviks and Cubans and Chinese used force, the National Socialists trickery.

 

You cannot have a Socialist Revolution, however, without social and political turmoil. Thus WWI birthed the Bolsheviks, WW1, French revenge and Versailles birthed the National Socialists, WW2 birthed the CCP.

 

If there is no turmoil, it must be created. However, because the population sought to be subjugated must be kept at the minimum quiescent and at the maximum terrorized, the Socialists will be dual, ie an open reasonable "Democratic" faction and their more violent, quieter faction. Thus Hitler could listen to Wagner with the Industrialists while his brown shirted homosexual minions battled Bolsheviks and racial enemies and Lenin could write intellectual pamphlets while Stalin tossed bombs in Tiflis and robbed banks.

 

Thus, in light of history and the foregoing, it is clear that the Socialists will resort to violence to create turmoil. The question then arises, with the infiltration tactics of Socialism now being stopped in the USA, are we about to see an explosion of revolutionary violence? Im sure you can imagine the propagandistic value of each of these killings. Its already evident and the trial of this one is yet to come.

 

If you look at it from the Socialist view, they have already infiltrated culture and institutions to the point that now the forces of reaction have arrived, they can expect favourable treatment for the wave of political violence they will unleash.

 

 

 

 

 

 

[bubblegum]

You remind me of Archie Bunker. And it's not a compliment.

[riclag]

On 12/10/2024 at 10:15 AM, Yagoda said:

It looks like our new Socialist hero, Luigi Mangione, is a highly educated rich kid imbued with utopian visions who sees himself as a foot soldier in the cultish belief of inevitable march to Socialism. His actions, his philosophy and his actions bring back such old socialist heroes as Vera Zasulich and Sophia Perovskaya.

 

For your own edification, and if you seek to understand things beyond zombie net soundbites, please see Giefmans Thou Shalt Kill, Revolutionary Terrorism in Russia, 1894-1917.

 

To continue, my thesis would be thus.

 

Socialism is a revolutionary movement that seeks to impose a utopian collective philosophy on humanity that is unfortunately for them inimical to the individualist nature of humanity. Accordingly, to achieve the collective utopia, all aspects of individuality must be eliminated.

 

Thus, any government based on Socialist principles will be authoritarian as it IMPOSES its view on the populace. It cannot tolerate dissent or deviations from the norm.

 

In view of the foregoing, no Socialist system can ever be imposed unless by force, or by trickery. Thus, the Bolsheviks and Cubans and Chinese used force, the National Socialists trickery.

 

You cannot have a Socialist Revolution, however, without social and political turmoil. Thus WWI birthed the Bolsheviks, WW1, French revenge and Versailles birthed the National Socialists, WW2 birthed the CCP.

 

If there is no turmoil, it must be created. However, because the population sought to be subjugated must be kept at the minimum quiescent and at the maximum terrorized, the Socialists will be dual, ie an open reasonable "Democratic" faction and their more violent, quieter faction. Thus Hitler could listen to Wagner with the Industrialists while his brown shirted homosexual minions battled Bolsheviks and racial enemies and Lenin could write intellectual pamphlets while Stalin tossed bombs in Tiflis and robbed banks.

 

Thus, in light of history and the foregoing, it is clear that the Socialists will resort to violence to create turmoil. The question then arises, with the infiltration tactics of Socialism now being stopped in the USA, are we about to see an explosion of revolutionary violence? Im sure you can imagine the propagandistic value of each of these killings. Its already evident and the trial of this one is yet to come.

 

If you look at it from the Socialist view, they have already infiltrated culture and institutions to the point that now the forces of reaction have arrived, they can expect favourable treatment for the wave of political violence they will unleash.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Evil leftest  will never stop!

Its refreshing to know that Grassroots 

organizations on and near indoctrination campuses( colleges & Uni’s) had a strong effect in the Swing States .

Now the question in my mind ,how does society react  to prison indoctrination ! This thug reminds me

Of the  BLM founders! Marxist  Radicals loose cannons while in prison!