R123 Posted August 13, 2007 Share Posted August 13, 2007 Anyway watching the Man U vs. Reading match could see that the tackle which caused the injury to Rooney was reckless. Last season in a match against Reading, two Chelsea goal keepers were badly injured by similar recklessness. The Reading manager and players seem to think that because of their obvious lack of ability the only way to survive is by the tactics they adopt. Agree? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spot Posted August 13, 2007 Share Posted August 13, 2007 I saw the tackle, and it's just one of those things. Rooney went in for the ball- some wouldn't. The reading defender had no choice. I don't think the intention was to injure Rooney. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bendix Posted August 13, 2007 Share Posted August 13, 2007 Michael Duberry doesnt have a malicious bone in his body. It was an accident, pure and simple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrbojangles Posted August 13, 2007 Share Posted August 13, 2007 Agree? No. Not intentional at all. Just one of those things unfortunately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThaiPauly Posted August 13, 2007 Share Posted August 13, 2007 Reading are NOT a vicious side. Rooney's injury was an accident,not even a murmer of foul play from the United side or Sir Alex. The Chelsea injuries were again accidental,the chances of that senario ever happening again are a million to one. Who else are we suposed to have knobled then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrbojangles Posted August 13, 2007 Share Posted August 13, 2007 Reading are NOT a vicious side.Rooney's injury was an accident,not even a murmer of foul play from the United side or Sir Alex. The Chelsea injuries were again accidental,the chances of that senario ever happening again are a million to one. Who else are we suposed to have knobled then? Take no notice TP Well done btw. I thought it was all over when you went down to 10 men but you held on. And then with Fergie time added and that dubious free kick in Fergie extra time. In the end i thought the ref was going to kick it in the net himself Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muckypups Posted August 13, 2007 Share Posted August 13, 2007 An accident, Rooney and Duberry going full tilt for the same ball, it happens...sadly.. I didn't think it was a malicious game at all.. Kitson's challenge was a pretty reckless studs up affair, but he was probably pumped up and obviously not into the pace of the game (who would be after 45secs!).. Many a referee would have settled for a yellow card.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R123 Posted August 13, 2007 Author Share Posted August 13, 2007 Hey ThaiPauly you say "we" are not a vicious team(the Royals "we"), yet it is the second consecutive season Reading have been involved in a game where the opposition have suffered a horrendous injury to one or more player. And the current Chelsea goal keeper is still wearing protective head gear. Its only one game into the season as well. We can but await to see what outrageous behaviour will be attempted on Reading's next opponents...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrbojangles Posted August 13, 2007 Share Posted August 13, 2007 Give over R123. Stop trying to wind him up, you surely can't think it was intended. Not even United or Rooney would agree with you. Who is your team by the way? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrtoad Posted August 13, 2007 Share Posted August 13, 2007 Anyway watching the Man U vs. Reading match could see that the tackle which caused the injury to Rooney was reckless.Last season in a match against Reading, two Chelsea goal keepers were badly injured by similar recklessness. The Reading manager and players seem to think that because of their obvious lack of ability the only way to survive is by the tactics they adopt. Agree? I'm a United fan, and I think the above statement is nonsense. Football is a contact sport, shit happens. End of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThaiPauly Posted August 13, 2007 Share Posted August 13, 2007 Hey ThaiPauly you say "we" are not a vicious team(the Royals "we"), yet it is the second consecutive season Reading have been involved in a game where the opposition have suffered a horrendous injury to one or more player.And the current Chelsea goal keeper is still wearing protective head gear. Its only one game into the season as well. We can but await to see what outrageous behaviour will be attempted on Reading's next opponents...... Well that would be Chelsea in about 48 hours time PS.You are'nt wnding me up...your comments are laughable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrtoad Posted August 13, 2007 Share Posted August 13, 2007 TP it's almost troll like, but so funny, everyone's laughing at it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark100 Posted August 13, 2007 Share Posted August 13, 2007 Anyway watching the Man U vs. Reading match could see that the tackle which caused the injury to Rooney was reckless.Last season in a match against Reading, two Chelsea goal keepers were badly injured by similar recklessness. The Reading manager and players seem to think that because of their obvious lack of ability the only way to survive is by the tactics they adopt. Agree? Did'nt think he meant it, be interesting to see what Tevez can do now ................. personally i think hes a god for what he did for us at West Ham last season, but up there is a different kettle of fish! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tw25rw Posted August 13, 2007 Share Posted August 13, 2007 Hey ThaiPauly you say "we" are not a vicious team(the Royals "we"), yet it is the second consecutive season Reading have been involved in a game where the opposition have suffered a horrendous injury to one or more player.And the current Chelsea goal keeper is still wearing protective head gear. Its only one game into the season as well. We can but await to see what outrageous behaviour will be attempted on Reading's next opponents...... He wears that headgear because he's a fairy, not because he's still injured. Apparently keepers need special protection, especially Chelsea keepers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scousemouse Posted August 13, 2007 Share Posted August 13, 2007 Michael Duberry doesnt have a malicious bone in his body. It was an accident, pure and simple. Michael Duberry is so honest that he wouldnt even tell a lie to keep his teamate and friend from going to jail . Rooney was more pissed off that he missed his chance on goal and didnt even feel the challenge at first , just one of those freak accidents. It will be intresting when Reading play Middlesborough , wonder if Duberry and Woodgate will shake hands . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrtoad Posted August 13, 2007 Share Posted August 13, 2007 Talking about Duberry, it's good to see him back in the premiership again. I always rated him when he was at Chelsea.His experience at Leeds was not a good one for his career after the court case. He never did that much at Stoke either, but Coppell has given him another deserved chance, and he looks like he is going to take it. Good on him. I also though that the injuries to Cudiccini and Chech at Reading were totally blown out of proportion anyway, to me they looked like genuine attempts to go for the ball. As I have already said, it is a contact sport. As for Chech, if he likes looking like Captain Condom then up to him. He doesn't need to wear that thing anymore, in fact his fracture will have healed very well by now, and there would be no significant weakness. I think he uses it to try and get sympathy from the refs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThaiPauly Posted August 13, 2007 Share Posted August 13, 2007 Who is your team by the way? Probably SWINDON Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R123 Posted August 14, 2007 Author Share Posted August 14, 2007 *yawn*..............*yawn"...........*yawn*......... swindon, oxford, reading, tranmere, scunthorpe. etc...all little provincial slum villages trying to be something they are not.... ....by the way where is reading? Ask a Thai they ain't got a clue..... Is it somewhere north of watford in a playing field near one of the those trailer park dumpy northern industrial towns, or what? The best one of the losers above can do is say that the Chelsea goalkeeper is a fairy and is faking it. Well hey don't try to use the attributes of your Thai bit towards a good goalie..... Now that is laughable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lazeeboy Posted August 14, 2007 Share Posted August 14, 2007 I saw the tackle, and it's just one of those things. Rooney went in for the ball- some wouldn't. The reading defender had no choice.I don't think the intention was to injure Rooney. i agree a 50/50 ball in a heated match ,nothing underhanded in it at all..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bendix Posted August 14, 2007 Share Posted August 14, 2007 *yawn*..............*yawn"...........*yawn*.........swindon, oxford, reading, tranmere, scunthorpe. etc...all little provincial slum villages trying to be something they are not.... ....by the way where is reading? Ask a Thai they ain't got a clue..... Is it somewhere north of watford in a playing field near one of the those trailer park dumpy northern industrial towns, or what? The best one of the losers above can do is say that the Chelsea goalkeeper is a fairy and is faking it. Well hey don't try to use the attributes of your Thai bit towards a good goalie..... Now that is laughable. Huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrtoad Posted August 14, 2007 Share Posted August 14, 2007 (edited) *yawn*..............*yawn"...........*yawn*.........swindon, oxford, reading, tranmere, scunthorpe. etc...all little provincial slum villages trying to be something they are not.... ....by the way where is reading? Ask a Thai they ain't got a clue..... Is it somewhere north of watford in a playing field near one of the those trailer park dumpy northern industrial towns, or what? The best one of the losers above can do is say that the Chelsea goalkeeper is a fairy and is faking it. Well hey don't try to use the attributes of your Thai bit towards a good goalie..... Now that is laughable. Huh? Bendix, from your reply you're lost for words. R123 I assuume from your reply you are probably a Chelsea fan. So which grubby little provincial town are you from? Didn't realise that Swindon, Oxford, Reading or Scunthorpe were villages and for your information the only one north of Watford is Scunthorpe. Your post is about as accurate as your assumption that there was malicious intent in the Rooney tackle. I know that in some places it is the "shroom season", but c'mon be realistic. Edited August 14, 2007 by mrtoad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThaiPauly Posted August 14, 2007 Share Posted August 14, 2007 *yawn*..............*yawn"...........*yawn*.........swindon, oxford, reading, tranmere, scunthorpe. etc...all little provincial slum villages trying to be something they are not.... ....by the way where is reading? Ask a Thai they ain't got a clue..... Is it somewhere north of watford in a playing field near one of the those trailer park dumpy northern industrial towns, or what? The best one of the losers above can do is say that the Chelsea goalkeeper is a fairy and is faking it. Well hey don't try to use the attributes of your Thai bit towards a good goalie..... Now that is laughable. Show any Thai a map of the UK and I am sure they will instantly know where Liverpool and Manchester are located You are definatley one can short of a six pack mate, but whatever, it takes all sorts to make a world right? But please feel free to carry on......have'nt had so much fun on TV for a long time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrbojangles Posted August 14, 2007 Share Posted August 14, 2007 *yawn*..............*yawn"...........*yawn*.........swindon, oxford, reading, tranmere, scunthorpe. etc...all little provincial slum villages trying to be something they are not.... ....by the way where is reading? Ask a Thai they ain't got a clue..... Is it somewhere north of watford in a playing field near one of the those trailer park dumpy northern industrial towns, or what? The best one of the losers above can do is say that the Chelsea goalkeeper is a fairy and is faking it. Well hey don't try to use the attributes of your Thai bit towards a good goalie..... Now that is laughable. Show any Thai a map of the UK and I am sure they will instantly know where Liverpool and Manchester are located You are definatley one can short of a six pack mate, but whatever, it takes all sorts to make a world right? But please feel free to carry on......have'nt had so much fun on TV for a long time I reckon he's an alter ego of Siam Superfly. He always came out with <deleted> all the time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrtoad Posted August 14, 2007 Share Posted August 14, 2007 I still have no real idea what he was trying to suggest in his last post Can anyone translate for a poor person from a slummy South Western provincial town? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrbojangles Posted August 14, 2007 Share Posted August 14, 2007 I still have no real idea what he was trying to suggest in his last post Can anyone translate for a poor person from a slummy South Western provincial town? Sorry but no. I think i am now from a Village somewhere in the midlands, just near Kilmarnock. So i'm more in the dark than you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scousemouse Posted August 14, 2007 Share Posted August 14, 2007 *yawn*..............*yawn"...........*yawn*.........swindon, oxford, reading, tranmere, scunthorpe. etc...all little provincial slum villages trying to be something they are not.... ....by the way where is reading? Ask a Thai they ain't got a clue..... Is it somewhere north of watford in a playing field near one of the those trailer park dumpy northern industrial towns, or what? The best one of the losers above can do is say that the Chelsea goalkeeper is a fairy and is faking it. Well hey don't try to use the attributes of your Thai bit towards a good goalie..... Now that is laughable. You are definatley one can short of a six pack mate, but whatever, it takes all sorts to make a world right? Or one sandwich short of a picnic . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now