Saudi Arabia And UAE Secretly Hit Back At Iran During Gulf War

Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates reportedly carried out covert retaliatory strikes against Iran after Tehran unleashed waves of missile and drone attacks on Gulf oil facilities during the Middle East war.

According to Iranian and Western officials cited in reports, the secret operations were launched after Iran repeatedly targeted energy infrastructure, airports and military sites across the Gulf as the regional conflict spiralled dangerously toward a wider war.

Neither Riyadh nor Abu Dhabi publicly acknowledged carrying out direct military attacks inside Iran, but officials familiar with the events said the retaliation formed part of a hidden shadow conflict that unfolded alongside the much more visible fighting between Iran, the United States and Israel.

The alleged strikes underline just how close the Gulf came to a full-scale regional explosion after war erupted earlier this year.

Iran’s Missile Campaign Shook Gulf States

The conflict dramatically escalated after US and Israeli airstrikes on Iran in late February triggered a furious Iranian response across the region.

Tehran reportedly launched missiles and drones against all six Gulf Cooperation Council states, striking not only military facilities hosting US forces but also civilian airports, energy infrastructure and commercial sites.

Iran also shut the Strait of Hormuz — one of the world’s most vital oil shipping lanes — sending shockwaves through global energy markets and threatening international trade.

Saudi Arabia and the UAE suddenly found themselves directly exposed despite decades of reliance on American military protection.

The attacks deeply rattled Gulf rulers, particularly after several Iranian strikes reportedly pierced sophisticated US-backed air defence systems protecting the region.

Secret Retaliation Behind Closed Doors

According to the reports, Saudi Arabia and the UAE responded by quietly launching covert strikes against Iranian targets.

The operations were never publicly acknowledged, reflecting the extreme sensitivity surrounding any direct Gulf military action against Tehran.

Western and Iranian sources claimed Saudi Arabia later informed Iran that it was prepared to escalate further if attacks continued, while also engaging in intense back-channel diplomacy aimed at preventing a wider regional war.

The UAE reportedly adopted a more aggressive stance during the crisis, seeking to impose a direct cost on Iran for attacking Gulf infrastructure.

Saudi Arabia, by contrast, pursued a dual-track strategy — retaliating while simultaneously trying to keep communication channels with Tehran open.

A senior Saudi foreign ministry official did not directly confirm the strikes but reiterated Riyadh’s official position favouring “de-escalation, self-restraint and the reduction of tensions.”

Fragile De-Escalation Agreement Emerged

Behind the scenes, Saudi and Iranian officials reportedly reached an informal understanding to reduce hostilities before the wider US-Iran ceasefire agreement took effect in April.

Ali Vaez of the International Crisis Group said the sequence of covert retaliation followed by diplomacy reflected a grim recognition on both sides that the conflict risked spiralling out of control.

“It shows not trust, but a shared interest in imposing limits on confrontation before it spiralled into a wider regional conflict,” he said.

The de-escalation appeared to have an immediate effect.

According to Reuters tallies of Saudi defence ministry statements, attacks against the kingdom dropped sharply in early April after weeks of relentless missile and drone strikes.

Western officials reportedly assessed that many of the remaining projectiles were launched not directly from Iran, but from allied militias operating inside Iraq.

Decades Of Rivalry Nearly Exploded Into War

The confrontation marked the most dangerous moment yet in the long-running rivalry between Iran and Saudi Arabia — the dominant Shi’ite and Sunni powers in the Middle East.

For years, the two nations backed opposing factions in conflicts stretching across Yemen, Syria, Lebanon and Iraq.

Relations had only recently improved after a China-brokered diplomatic thaw in 2023 restored formal ties between the regional rivals.

That détente helped maintain a fragile ceasefire in Yemen between Saudi Arabia and the Iran-backed Houthi movement, while also easing tensions across the Gulf.

But the latest war exposed just how quickly the region could slide back toward open confrontation.

Gulf Leaders Fear Wider Regional Inferno

Saudi Arabia appears deeply conscious of the catastrophic consequences a direct war with Iran could unleash.

In an opinion piece published in Saudi-owned media, former Saudi intelligence chief Prince Turki al-Faisal said the kingdom deliberately chose restraint even after suffering repeated attacks.

“When Iran and others tried to drag the kingdom into the furnace of destruction, our leadership chose to endure the pains caused by a neighbour in order to protect the lives and property of its citizens,” he wrote.

Despite the fragile ceasefire, tensions remain dangerously high.

Saudi Arabia reportedly considered launching additional retaliation after another spike in drone and missile attacks during the opening days of the broader ceasefire agreement.

Pakistan even deployed fighter jets to reassure the kingdom as fears grew that the entire Gulf region could be pulled into a much larger war.

For now, the secret diplomacy appears to have prevented that nightmare scenario.

But the covert strikes and hidden negotiations reveal how close the Middle East came to an all-out regional conflict fought far beyond the public eye.

SOURCE

Funny as much of the dirty money of the world, including that from Iran, is safely stashed in Dubai and neither the European Union nor America even more strangely, have ever uttered a word.

Not to mention all the doubts on Qatar and the fact that they have been funding Iran and other groups all around Gaza. America strangely has never uttered a word neither.

Any Evidence to back up this Sigmund ??

This sounds a little dramatic. Iran can still cause damage with missiles, drones, proxies, and harassment in the Gulf — nobody should pretend that’s nothing.

But that’s not the same as Iran being able to drag Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and the U.S. into some full-blown traditional war it can actually win.

Iran’s strength has always been asymmetric warfare: proxies, drones, missiles, and disruption, not matching the U.S. or Gulf states in a conventional fight.

Saudi restraint makes sense because nobody wants oil markets and shipping routes set on fire. But let’s not confuse “Iran can still be dangerous” with “Iran is some unstoppable military giant.”

Iran is a regional troublemaker with rockets, not the final boss in a video game.

3 hours ago, Sigmund said:

Funny as much of the dirty money of the world, including that from Iran, is safely stashed in Dubai and neither the European Union nor America even more strangely, have ever uttered a word.

Not to mention all the doubts on Qatar and the fact that they have been funding Iran and other groups all around Gaza. America strangely has never uttered a word neither.

There’s a little truth buried in this, but the “America never said a word” part is just not true.

Dubai/UAE has absolutely been criticized for money laundering risk. The UAE was even put on the international FATF grey list before, then later being removed after reforms.

The U.S. Treasury has also sanctioned Iran-linked networks using UAE-based front companies.

On Qatar, yes, there are serious questions about Qatari money going into Gaza/Hamas-controlled systems. But saying Qatar is “funding Iran” is a different claim and needs actual evidence.

The Iranian money issue in Qatar was mostly about frozen Iranian funds, and the U.S. moved to keep Iran from accessing it.

So the fair version is: Gulf money channels are complicated and sometimes dirty. The unfair version is pretending the U.S. and Europe never noticed.

19 hours ago, ericthai said:

There’s a little truth buried in this, but the “America never said a word” part is just not true.

Dubai/UAE has absolutely been criticized for money laundering risk. The UAE was even put on the international FATF grey list before, then later being removed after reforms.

The U.S. Treasury has also sanctioned Iran-linked networks using UAE-based front companies.

On Qatar, yes, there are serious questions about Qatari money going into Gaza/Hamas-controlled systems. But saying Qatar is “funding Iran” is a different claim and needs actual evidence.

The Iranian money issue in Qatar was mostly about frozen Iranian funds, and the U.S. moved to keep Iran from accessing it.

So the fair version is: Gulf money channels are complicated and sometimes dirty. The unfair version is pretending the U.S. and Europe never noticed.

not about not being noticed as a 16 year old would be aware of the situation...it's about closing one's eye and looking the other way like America and the European Union.

19 hours ago, ericthai said:

On Qatar, yes, there are serious questions about Qatari money going into Gaza/Hamas-controlled systems

Qatar has bribed the USA intelligentsia to cover for them. I wouldnt doubt that the savage jew hating mobs running wild in NYC are partially funded by Qatar. We already know the Iranians fund Euro sycophants

Hm. Dirty money? The only thing that means is money govts haven't got their sticky little paws on. So what!