UK firms face scrutiny over Russian gas trade worth billions

Sabetta port in Russia on the Kara Sea shore. Shipments from the Yamal LNG plant are currently exempt from the sanctions

British companies are facing mounting criticism after fresh claims that UK-linked shipping and insurance services continue to support Russian liquefied natural gas exports, helping generate hundreds of millions of pounds each month for the Kremlin despite sweeping Western sanctions.

The controversy centres on a government exemption that allows certain services connected to Russia’s largest LNG projects to continue until January, raising questions about whether commercial realities are undermining Britain’s efforts to weaken Moscow’s war machine.

Sanctions Crackdown Leaves a Major Gap

Last month, ministers announced tougher restrictions aimed at limiting support for Russian LNG exports, including measures targeting shipping services and insurance.

However, exemptions covering the Yamal LNG and Sakhalin-2 projects remain in place for several more months. Critics argue the delay effectively allows billions of pounds in fossil fuel revenues to keep flowing into Russia while the war in Ukraine continues.

Campaigners warn the arrangement risks blunting the impact of sanctions designed to reduce the Kremlin’s ability to finance military operations.

The Energy Security Dilemma

Government officials insist the phased approach is necessary to avoid disruption to global energy markets and protect supply chains.

That calculation has become even more sensitive amid instability in the Middle East and concerns over energy security. Industry figures argue Europe still relies on Russian gas supplies to some extent, creating an uncomfortable balancing act between economic stability and geopolitical pressure.

One energy executive described the situation as a necessary compromise to keep energy flowing while alternatives are developed.

Glasgow Firm Drawn Into the Debate

Attention has focused on a Glasgow-based shipping operation that manages specialised icebreaking LNG tankers serving Russia’s Arctic export infrastructure.

Campaigners claim such vessels remain critical to transporting gas from Siberian production facilities to international markets. The company’s activities are legal under current regulations, but critics argue legality does not resolve the broader political and moral questions.

UK icebreaker tankers including the Rudolf Samoylovich , pictured above, have assisted Russian vessels

Insurance Industry Under Pressure

The spotlight has also fallen on Britain’s maritime insurance sector, which remains one of the world's most influential.

Research groups claim UK-based insurers continue to provide coverage for a significant proportion of vessels carrying Russian LNG. Insurers counter that their role is to provide protection against accidents, environmental damage and maritime risks in trades that remain lawful under existing sanctions.

Growing Questions for Whitehall

The row exposes a deeper tension at the heart of Western policy toward Russia. Governments want to squeeze Kremlin revenues while avoiding energy shocks that could damage their own economies.

For critics, the exemption represents a costly loophole. For ministers, it is a temporary measure designed to manage risk. With the deadline approaching, pressure is building on Whitehall to decide whether commercial pragmatism or sanctions pressure takes priority.

‘Deal with the devil’: UK ships helping Putin raise £700m a month to fund his war