Fauci contempt case could become legal headache for Trump DOJ

Prosecutors face awkward choices over attempt to punish former COVID chief

The Trump administration could face an unexpectedly difficult legal battle if it decides to prosecute former COVID adviser Dr Anthony Fauci for contempt of Congress. A Senate committee has voted to refer Fauci for criminal prosecution after he invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination 111 times during a recent hearing, but former prosecutors warn that turning the referral into a successful criminal case is far from straightforward.

The Fifth Amendment problem

Republican Sen. Rand Paul, who led the push against Fauci, argues that the former government scientist should not have been able to repeatedly refuse questions and claims a pardon granted to him by former President Joe Biden removes any legitimate fear of prosecution.

But the pardon is not blanket protection. It covers alleged federal offences committed between January 2014 and January 2025, leaving potential exposure for matters outside that period, including some allegations that could arise from his congressional testimony. Three state attorneys general have also subpoenaed Fauci as part of their own investigations.

That gives Fauci a potentially powerful argument that he still has reasonable grounds to fear that his answers could be used against him.

A prosecution could backfire

Former prosecutors cited by The Hill say a judge could be reluctant to punish someone for exercising a constitutional right, particularly when prosecutors cannot guarantee that the testimony would not expose him to other criminal proceedings.

The case also presents an awkward choice for the Justice Department. Pursuing Fauci could satisfy Republicans who have spent years demanding accountability over the government's handling of Covid, but a failed prosecution could instead strengthen his legal position and generate another political confrontation over the limits of congressional power.

The Senate has yet to approve the referral, meaning the fight is still at an early stage. For now, the attempt to put Fauci behind bars looks considerably easier politically than it may prove legally.

SOURCE

3 hours ago, Social Media said:

Former prosecutors cited by The Hill say a judge could be reluctant to punish someone for exercising a constitutional right, particularly when prosecutors cannot guarantee that the testimony would not expose him to other criminal proceedings.

In particular as Florida, West Virginia, and Louisiana already started to investigate Fauci, claiming that a Presidential pardon does not apply to state-level laws. 😃

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/three-state-attorneys-general-subpoena-anthony-fauci-covid-guidance-rcna591082

Edited August 10Aug 10 by candide

I don't believe for a second that Dr. Fauci acted in bad faith. This insane retribution campaign will result in the best people saying "Eff this! I'm getting out before I perform an act the mad king or his minions don't like." We've already lost/fired some of the best from the Justice Department because they saw the handwriting on the wall. Too many other government agencies to list have followed suit. The damage done will take generations to repair. The historical stench will be similar to that from which Germany still suffers.

RFK mast be having a few second thoughts !

Measles anyone .?

Trump plead the 5 th 440 times in deposition he had ,and he never faced

any kind of retribution ,it is in the constitution is it not ,but Trump must

try and get his pound of flesh.the quicker the midterms comes the better

so we can return to some kind of normalcy ....

regardsworgeordie