Ask her about fashion!

What, do you think that is cute?

Do you think being the leader of Thailand is somehow funny and a person for you to mock?

Your goofy avatar is bad enough to have to look at but paired with your obnoxious sense of humor directed towards a person whom you have never met it's a little over the top and certainly not in keeping with the image cultivated by your government of enlightened and civil people.

Part of the definition of a flame and certainly encompasses your post, “clearly intended to incite useless arguments, to launch personal attacks, to insult, or to be hateful.

Is the PM someone to mock, or is she a mock PM? Does having a PM whose credentials stop at nepotism and having the right surname make a mockery of the position?

When the press asks questions of this PM she deflects, defers and declines on most occasions, and her only definitive answers are invariably lies. She appears in parliament once every second blue moon, reads from a script, gives a big smile and fades from view like a Cheshire cat, making a mockery of her MP status.

Her fashion sense is the only thing that can't be mocked - she doesn't even own a (s)mock.

Ask her about fashion!

What, do you think that is cute?

Do you think being the leader of Thailand is somehow funny and a person for you to mock?

Your goofy avatar is bad enough to have to look at but paired with your obnoxious sense of humor directed towards a person whom you have never met it's a little over the top and certainly not in keeping with the image cultivated by your government of enlightened and civil people.

Part of the definition of a flame and certainly encompasses your post, “clearly intended to incite useless arguments, to launch personal attacks, to insult, or to be hateful.

You're completely skipping the preface to the forum rule you cite, which completely negates your points :

4) Not to flame fellow members

AFAIK, although some members have used her photo for an avatar, Yingluck is not a fellow member and is, instead, a public official AKA fair game.

You are, however, certainly not alone in failing to recognize this very distinct difference between flaming officials and flaming fellow members.

p.s.

Your use of

in your post above is also addressed in the forum rules:

Posting in all capitals or in all bold, and using large or unusual fonts and colors is bad netiquette.

.

I have no idea what your are writing about. I am writing in black and white with the font presented in the response box. What are you seeing?

Ask her about fashion!

What, do you think that is cute?

Do you think being the leader of Thailand is somehow funny and a person for you to mock?

Your goofy avatar is bad enough to have to look at but paired with your obnoxious sense of humor directed towards a person whom you have never met it's a little over the top and certainly not in keeping with the image cultivated by your government of enlightened and civil people.

Part of the definition of a flame and certainly encompasses your post, “clearly intended to incite useless arguments, to launch personal attacks, to insult, or to be hateful.

You're completely skipping the preface to the forum rule you cite, which completely negates your points :

4) Not to flame fellow members

AFAIK, although some members have used her photo for an avatar, Yingluck is not a fellow member and is, instead, a public official AKA fair game.

You are, however, certainly not alone in failing to recognize this very distinct difference between flaming officials and flaming fellow members.

p.s.

Your use of

in your post above is also addressed in the forum rules:

Posting in all capitals or in all bold, and using large or unusual fonts and colors is bad netiquette.

.

I have no idea what your are writing about. I am writing in black and white with the font presented in the response box. What are you seeing?

It's the code that is visible when quoting a reply to you and it changes the appearance of your text.

It's not the forum default in either text size, nor color and font.

.

I guess when one has disposable money, that one would have to actually go to open markets to find out what impact rising prices have on all of the struggling hard working Thais. Another PR stretch. Can't wait for the censor debate to start.