Thailand Keeps Ranking In Global Real-Estate Index

[webfact]

REAL ESTATE INDEX

Thailand keeps ranking in global real-estate index

The Nation

BANGKOK: -- Thailand's overall ranking is unchanged in the 2012 Global Real Estate Transparency Index, a Jones Lang LaSalle survey that calculates transparency in 97 real-estate markets worldwide by weighting 83 factors.

The index provides investors and corporate occupiers with data and analysis critical to transacting, owning and operating in global markets, besides assisting governments and other industry organisations interested in improving transparency.

In the 2012 report, Thailand ranks 39th among the 97 markets covered. While this is the same as in the 2010 report, the Kingdom's real-estate market showed continued improvement in its transparency score.

The scores in the Global Real Estate Transparency Index range between one and five, with one representing the highest level of transparency and five being opaque. Thailand's real-estate transparency score has improved to 2.94, from 3.02, 3.16 and 3.40 in 2010, 2008 and 2006, respectively.

"Higher transparency in the country's capital markets, specifically in relation to real estate, continued to be a major factor in improving real-estate transparency," said Suphin Mechuchep, managing director of Jones Lang LaSalle in Thailand.

The number of companies listed under the property development sector on the Stock Exchange of Thailand has risen from 60 in 2010 to 63 at present, while the number of property funds which trade on the SET has grown from 26 to 38.

These listed vehicles are subject to strict governance and regulation, as well as regular and standardised reporting, thus providing more transparency to Thailand's real-estate market, she said.

This trend is being reinforced by the introduction of real-estate investment trusts into Thailand this year, which will allow for investment in more asset types, such as hospitals, education and golf courses, she added.

Chris Fossick, Jones Lang LaSalle managing director for Singapore and Southeast Asia, said the real-estate markets in Southeast Asia had made significant inroads in improving their transparency over the past two years.

Three out of the top 10 improvers globally are from the region - the Philippines, Indonesia and Vietnam. All three countries have improved on the back of greater availability of market data and changes in the regulatory and transaction processes, he said.

With the exception of Vietnam, most Southeast Asian markets are either in the transparent (Singapore and Malaysia) or semi-transparent (the Philippines, Thailand and Indonesia) bands.

This finding is echoed by the recent rise in direct foreign investment into Asean, especially into Indonesia and the Philippines. The rise of FDI into Asean is testament to global investors' confidence in the long-term growth potential in the region, he added.

-- The Nation 2012-06-28

[meand]

If we were to assume Thailand does become more transparent in the neat future, what affects do you folks think that would have on the market? I would assume more transparency would mean more confidence, higher prices and more stability.

[Lannatyne]

If we were to assume Thailand does become more transparent in the neat future, what affects do you folks think that would have on the market? I would assume more transparency would mean more confidence, higher prices and more stability.

In my opinion, very little. Most purchases here are based on 'emotion', I believe, and that won;t follow normal market behaviours.

[GaiUan]

As if market reactions in the West were based on solid grounds... there is nothing less rational than the market, and this is not Thai-specific...

[yoshiwara]

That transparency one assumes is a weighted average of purchase/sales of both 'foreigner' owned condos and nominee company property ownership. No doubt the headline 'improving transparency' is used as a selling tool for the nominee company property ownership and so the buyer falls into the trap.

[mrgreg]

Would be great to have the link to the said survey as I wonder what the 83 factors are...