zzap Posted February 22, 2006 Share Posted February 22, 2006 Sometimes I wonder whether it's worth the effort to contribute some serious thoughts... That Fox is always taking the mickey! (He says with tears running down his cheeks ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gharknes Posted February 22, 2006 Share Posted February 22, 2006 (edited) I got to page 3 of this thread and gave up, most of the posts are pointless. Based on what has been officially released, they have proven that sex took place between these two people...............no further discussion required on that one Did she consent ? rapes are usually between 2 people so no witnesses, conviction is based solely on testimony from both parties, other factors such as motives would be considered if either party had something to gain Did he confess ? if so the case is closed. end of thread Edited February 22, 2006 by gharknes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pattaya_Fox Posted February 22, 2006 Share Posted February 22, 2006 I got to page 3 of this thread and gave up, most of the posts are pointless.Based on what has been officially released, they have proven that sex took place between these two people...............no further discussion required on that one Did she consent ? rapes are usually between 2 people so no witnesses, conviction is based solely on testimony from both parties, other factors such as motives would be considered if either party had something to gain Did he confess ? if so the case is closed. end of thread The last I heard was that she was staying in Thailand to attend his trial. Has anyone got an update on the trial? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zzap Posted February 22, 2006 Share Posted February 22, 2006 I got to page 3 of this thread and gave up, most of the posts are pointless.Based on what has been officially released, they have proven that sex took place between these two people...............no further discussion required on that one Did she consent ? rapes are usually between 2 people so no witnesses, conviction is based solely on testimony from both parties, other factors such as motives would be considered if either party had something to gain Did he confess ? if so the case is closed. end of thread A bit slow on the uptake, are we? -Witnesses before and after the event, such as security video and the people she called for help. -She was carried out of the bar in a comatose state after being drugged. Did she consent? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexth Posted February 23, 2006 Share Posted February 23, 2006 I got to page 3 of this thread and gave up, most of the posts are pointless.Based on what has been officially released, they have proven that sex took place between these two people...............no further discussion required on that one Did she consent ? rapes are usually between 2 people so no witnesses, conviction is based solely on testimony from both parties, other factors such as motives would be considered if either party had something to gain Did he confess ? if so the case is closed. end of thread I don't know what is the truth, but as for the "Did he confess ? if so the case is closed." thing, I should think twice, the brownies have quite reputable skills for making people confess, not mentioning for finding witnesses Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gharknes Posted February 23, 2006 Share Posted February 23, 2006 I got to page 3 of this thread and gave up, most of the posts are pointless. Based on what has been officially released, they have proven that sex took place between these two people...............no further discussion required on that one Did she consent ? rapes are usually between 2 people so no witnesses, conviction is based solely on testimony from both parties, other factors such as motives would be considered if either party had something to gain Did he confess ? if so the case is closed. end of thread A bit slow on the uptake, are we? -Witnesses before and after the event, such as security video and the people she called for help. -She was carried out of the bar in a comatose state after being drugged. Did she consent? you don't get it, the only witness at this point that would be of any value is the one that heard her say no, like I said, the event did take place the point is - did she consent, how does she prove she didn't, how does he prove she did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gburns57au Posted February 23, 2006 Share Posted February 23, 2006 A bit slow on the uptake, are we? -Witnesses before and after the event, such as security video and the people she called for help. -She was carried out of the bar in a comatose state after being drugged. Did she consent? Zzap.....you have got your threads mixed....this is a Pattaya case not the Samui case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zzap Posted February 23, 2006 Share Posted February 23, 2006 Correct, gburns, thanks for pointing this out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pattaya_Fox Posted February 23, 2006 Share Posted February 23, 2006 Correct, gburns, thanks for pointing this out. Yes it does help if we are all talking about the same event Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now