Jump to content

Flood Drainage Test In Bangkok To Be Stopped If It Goes Wrong


webfact

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

related topic:

Drainage tests inundate rice field in Thailand’s old capital

image_2012090512152794DABE77-DA0D-3FF7-DD8DA493D2572988.jpg

AYUTTHAYA, Sept 5 – More than 1,000 rai of paddy field in this 'rice bowl' province, 76km north of Bangkok, was flooded Wednesday as the water level rose one metre higher than the Chao Phraya river, the lifeline of the central plains.

Full story: http://www.thaivisa....ital-ayutthaya/

Interesting to see that 'upstream' the Chao Phraya has burst ("one metre higher than the Chao Phraya river") already without that much excessive rainfall.

Are the water defences causing a barrier and 'Up-Country' is being sacrificed again? Not really dealing with a national problem......thumbsup.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I would like to know is exactly what they are going to stop in case this real time test fails?

What are their benchmarks of a failed system? It is not as if they can close the sluices and the 'problem' ends there. If a problem is detected, where will all the released water behind that point go?

Difficult to take water away from the path of least resistance.............wink.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"........were 90% ready for the test".

Wouldn't it be prudent to be 100% ready?

I'm pretty sure that they are aiming to be 100% ready and were only at 90% at the time of the press release.

The flooding in Ayutthaya would seem to indicate otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These Thai's are an absolute f****ing joke. We live right beside a klong near Maha Sawat. They came and 'cleared out the klong' Their version was to use an excavator sitting on a barge and scoop out the garbage and place it on the bank. Guess what? The next rain just washed it all back in again. Someone made some baht out of that for sure

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, just to be optimistic, perhaps we will learn something useful from this test. If it works out fine, then it would seem that some progress has actually been made to reduce the flooding problems.

It's kind of nice to see some action instead of talk only.

Well I agree it would be nice to learn some thing useful. But do you think they would understand it if they had a chance.

I am not sure what they are testing. I know that 45 cubic meters a second being poured into a area only designed to take 10 cubic meters a second won't work. It will how ever tell them how high the water will get at that point in a four hour period of time. And if it rains for a longer period of time which it will they will be clueless as to what to do. I don't think they can get 1,000 boats in a canal.

But I don't want to sell them short they might try to!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my country they perform these tests in a laboratory. It is controlled, and it is possible to test all kind of situations, like pump failures and so on.....

Waterloopkundig laboratorium.

http://www.deltares.nl/en

Oh smartypants, TIT. They know better.

I am sure if they had asked nicely they could have had a scale model of the entire system built by the Dutch for free, and Yingluck and her bunch could play pooh-sticks to their hearts content in the comfort of their own home.

I know the Dutch are great at water management (im Dutch) but i am not sure if it could account for everything. A model is just that a model, the real thing is a different beast all together.

But of course testing in a model before testing in the real thing makes a lot of sense.

Well knowingly pushing water from a channel with a max flow rate of 45 cubic per min into a channel of maximum 10 cubic per minute is going to prove exactly what? They know how far to open the channel to regulate 7 cubic per minute. They really need to do a full scale test to discover this?

Wooooopppeeeee.

Then what? Either it will flood or it won't in reality.

I am all for testing, but in reality, the entire system could be computer modelled in very little time, all of the pinch points calculated, redesigns made, modelled again on computer, and something would improve. Why must it be done to re-invent the wheel over and over again, and claiming success, instead of availing oneself of all the accumulated global knowledge that is out there?

We have super computers modelling global weather, I somehow think that the Bangkok canal and drainage system isn't beyond most powerful home computers and some modelling software.

Agreed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am sure everything can be put in a computer model if you have the correct data. But how do you know that there is no blockage anywhere or that the data is correct. A model is a model and in the Netherlands id trust it, here not really as im not sure all things are documented.

If you read more in the topic i also wondered about the 45 vs 10 cubic meters

Well, if you know the maximum theoretical flow and you estimate that the channel is 50% full with shopping trolleys, dumped cars, houses and refuse from last year's event, the odd dead dog and 10mn plastic bags half filled with somtaam, you have 50% of 10cubic as a maximum.

Of course, this year it is supposed to have been dredged, which of course, they will do religiously every year to maintain as close to the theoretical maximum as possible, so this test will be absolutely representative of what will happen every year. thumbsup.gif

Meanwhile, they just sent water 1m over the banks up stream, so they obviously have a very precise facility to control the water flow.clap2.gif That ladies and gentleman is the absolute gold medal winner in terms of political suicide and incompetence that I think I have ever read anywhere in the world. If you were reading it on the front page of Notthenation or Private Eye you would accept it hook line and sinker.

After all the money, talking, planning, spending, hand wringing, they try to conduct a real simulation to test one part of the system at 70% of its capacity and they send water 1m over the wall up country. cheesy.gif

Edited by Thai at Heart
Link to comment
Share on other sites

so if it doesn't work they are going to stop? this must be a very new concept for it to make news.

Why they test it NOW in the middle of the rainy season ?? Why there were no tests before ????

Amazing Thailand i guess..... My oh my....whistling.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so if it doesn't work they are going to stop? this must be a very new concept for it to make news.

Why they test it NOW in the middle of the rainy season ?? Why there were no tests before ????

Amazing Thailand i guess..... My oh my....whistling.gif

I am waiting for the report that they let 7 cubic per minute extra into the channel as required, without thinking that the channel was already half full.

Edited by Thai at Heart
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had a good laugh at the headline too. If it goes wrong near where they release the water, how the hell will they stop the flow?

They're supposedly 90% ready. Well, I'd sympathise with anyone living near one of the klongs involved. I'm around 90% sure that this whole 'idea' is stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am sure everything can be put in a computer model if you have the correct data. But how do you know that there is no blockage anywhere or that the data is correct. A model is a model and in the Netherlands id trust it, here not really as im not sure all things are documented.

If you read more in the topic i also wondered about the 45 vs 10 cubic meters

Well, if you know the maximum theoretical flow and you estimate that the channel is 50% full with shopping trolleys, dumped cars, houses and refuse from last year's event, the odd dead dog and 10mn plastic bags half filled with somtaam, you have 50% of 10cubic as a maximum.

Of course, this year it is supposed to have been dredged, which of course, they will do religiously every year to maintain as close to the theoretical maximum as possible, so this test will be absolutely representative of what will happen every year. thumbsup.gif

Meanwhile, they just sent water 1m over the banks up stream, so they obviously have a very precise facility to control the water flow.clap2.gif That ladies and gentleman is the absolute gold medal winner in terms of political suicide and incompetence that I think I have ever read anywhere in the world. If you were reading it on the front page of Notthenation or Private Eye you would accept it hook line and sinker.

After all the money, talking, planning, spending, hand wringing, they try to conduct a real simulation to test one part of the system at 70% of its capacity and they send water 1m over the wall up country. cheesy.gif

Great work stupid people involved, but what i mean is that models and reality always conflict. I am all for using models first. But especially here in Thailand you can never be sure you account for all the stupid things that go around here. Like the not dredging it all .. illigal structures ect.

And yes this is political suicide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great headline. Nah, keep on going I sat.

Science minister claims sun shines in daytime.

This science minister would better study some basic principles of water drainage before playing with real-scale tests jeopardisinig people's safety. Never heard of mathematic computer model-tests? Tablet computers are an ideal initiation of getting through this process..., which should not take longer than 3 hours before the batteries are finished. What a load of nonsense we have here now. What immaturity!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

related topic:

Drainage tests inundate rice field in Thailand’s old capital

image_2012090512152794DABE77-DA0D-3FF7-DD8DA493D2572988.jpg

AYUTTHAYA, Sept 5 – More than 1,000 rai of paddy field in this 'rice bowl' province, 76km north of Bangkok, was flooded Wednesday as the water level rose one metre higher than the Chao Phraya river, the lifeline of the central plains.

Full story: http://www.thaivisa....ital-ayutthaya/

Interesting to see that 'upstream' the Chao Phraya has burst ("one metre higher than the Chao Phraya river") already without that much excessive rainfall.

Are the water defences causing a barrier and 'Up-Country' is being sacrificed again? Not really dealing with a national problem......thumbsup.gif

It's the same old story, sacrifice the other nations as if they are the scum of flood society to protect one main city in Bangkok, that is going to sink deeper and deeper in years to come, almost as downlow as Ayutthaya.

You know what happens, when all the other provinces in Thailand is flooding???? cheesy.gifcheesy.gif

Will you know what will happen to the Thai economy, if the main agricultural societies that are mainly upcountry get flooded for more than half a year??? Rice fields, fruit plantations, etc???? Will Bangkok people actually have enough to eat???? cheesy.gifcheesy.gifcheesy.gif

Do you get my points, ladies and gentlemen,... by sacrificing upcountry provinces nationwide, The Thai government will let the majority of arrogant people suffer an anguish Food crisis… cheesy.gifcheesy.gifcheesy.gif

Transportation for supplies are gonna get gridlocked…cheesy.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now when that water gets down stream. What happens to Bangkok? I distinctly remember a piece in The Nation posted on TV News forum last year. A government minister said if Bangkok floods next year, we deserve to be kicked out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What i find strange is that if you know of a problem point that is only letting through 20% or less then the rest of the canal that they would not dredge.. enlarge that portion some way. It would be a huge win for drainage.

Too logical, you must be Dutch wink.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bangkok's east on Friday because Lat Phrao Canal was ready to receive large amounts of water after officials removed mud and sewage from it.

Aloha

I am far, far from being a rocket scientist, but if they have and continue to, clean out all the toxic waste from the storm drains, at least the flooding waters will not be as contaminated as before, also not piling the toxic waste, near the river,which will rise.

I just try to deal with K I S S "Keep It Simple Stupid" and it seems to work for me...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...