Jump to content

Bank For Agriculture Gets Cash Amid More Heat Over Rice Scheme: Thailand


Recommended Posts

BAAC gets cash amid more heat over rice scheme

CHAMMAN NOISAMRAN,

PIYANART SRIVALO,

KHANITTHA THEPPAJORN

THE NATION

30191952-01_big.jpg

BANGKOK: -- The government gave the Bank for Agriculture and Agricultural Cooperatives (BAAC) close to Bt92 billion yesterday to finance its rice subsidy scheme. The move followed a complaint of insufficient funding, a senior bank executive said.

Of the total amount granted, just under Bt50 billion had been set aside from the 2013 state budget to cover costs the bank would have to shoulder implementing the scheme. And close to Bt42 billion was sent to the bank after the government sold part of its rice stockpile.

BAAC executive vice president Boonthai Kaewkhantee explained yesterday that the bank had spent Bt118.58 billion so far to buy up 6.95 million tonnes of rice from 1.14 million farmers in the 2011/2012 crop season. The bank is also spending Bt190 billion to purchase 12.82 million tonnes from 1.02 million farmers in the second harvest season.

"There should be no problem for the bank to finance the rice-pledging scheme for the 2012/2013 harvests, since the government has promised to provide Bt240 billion," Boonthai said.

The government was expected to sell part of its rice stocks this year and give the bank another Bt40 billion, he said. The government would also borrow Bt150 billion and provide more funds for the bank to buy 15 million tonnes of rice in the first crop year of 2012/2013, he said.

The government also announced yesterday it would proceed with a serious inquiry into any corruption in the rice pledging scheme.

To date, some 25 cases are being investigated. Four of these involve government officials from the circumvention practice. The rest are complaints by farmers of cheating in the project by rice millers. Damage from the cheating was put at a total of Bt307 million. In addition, nearly 92,000 farmers were waiting for assistance.

Police were sent to probe two points - the registration of farmers and the pledging point.

"Prime Minister Yingluck has ordered concerned agencies to rush to investigate and find facts about the whole pledging scheme, and whoever is found guilty will be subject to punishment," Deputy Premier Chalerm Yoobamrung said yesterday. He said the reports now only showed small cases of graft.

Farmers were also allegedly satisfied with government managers sending police to survey proceedings at the pledging points.

"Anybody who is unsatisfied with the price pledging programme should submit this issue to the Parliament for debate. Every government wants to upgrade people's way life but they have different thoughts and methods on how to do this," Chalerm said.

Chalerm, who chairs a special centre to probe corruption in the price pledging policy, asked if the government tolerated corruption, "why has it set up this investigating centre?

"I have worked as a police officer, [and know that] what we are doing should have evidence."

He claimed that the BAAC was politicising the subsidy scheme because the bank's top managers were appointed by Democrat Party.

"The bank claimed that it ran out of budget for the price subsidy project. [but] if the budget had gone, the bank should ask for such financial support from the Finance Ministry," Chalerm said. He said the bank officials involved should be identified.

The centre will call a meeting with concerned government agencies including the Comptroller General's Department, the Public Warehouse Organisation and the BAAC within the next three weeks. In addition, it will arrange a conference call with governors nationwide to keep a close watch on the scheme.

The government believes that when Vietnam sells its rice, the price of Thai rice will automatically rise. It hopes to eventually impose a trading set-up in the world market in the same way Opec sets oil prices.

Meanwhile, a group of senators sought a special debate with the government yesterday about its rice price-pledging project, in another blow to the expensive scheme.

Senator Paiboon Nititawan submitted a motion to Senate Speaker Nikom Wairachpanit, asking for him to call the general debate without voting, under Article 161 of the Constitution. Paiboon's motion has been backed by 80 senators.

Article 161 allows senators of not less than one-third of the Upper House to submit a motion for a general debate in the Senate, without a resolution to be passed. Under the clause, the Cabinet is requested to give statements of fact or explain important problems in connection with the administration of the state affairs.

Paiboon said yesterday that the government's Bt400-billion project was plagued with graft and had met with criticism and opposition, with the latest move coming from a group of academics from the National Institute of Development Administration (Nida).

"There should be a discussion to seek solutions to the problems. There must be improvement to ensure maximum benefit for farmers and to prevent wastage of state funds," he said.

Nikom said after accepting the motion that he would forward it to the Prime Minister's Office by himself. "I believe Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra will send a representative to explain the matter with the Senate as soon as possible although no timeframe is set in the Constitution," he said.

Senator Jetn Siratharanont said there were many issues in the project senators wanted to ask the government about. These included the sale of rice in government stocks, delays in payment to farmers selling to the government, and the new project for the next year. "I believe the government will explain to us before the end of this current parliamentary session on November 28," he said.

Senator Sumon Sutawiriyawat, who chairs the Senate's panel on corruption prevention and good governance, called on the government yesterday and related state agencies to disclose details to support their claim that 7 million tonnes to rice had been sold to other countries under government-to-government deals. She suspected this could be another "white lie", referring to the recent admission by Finance Minister Kittiratt Na-Ranong that he told "white lies" about economic matters.

Senator Prasarn Maruekapitak, during yesterday's Senate meeting, expressed doubt about government claims of massive rice sales. He said his sources among rice exporters were unaware of any recent signs that rice of such a huge volume was shipped from Thailand.

nationlogo.jpg

-- The Nation 2012-10-09

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No long term good can come from this scheme.The only way to survive moving forward is to increase efficiency and productivity from the farms. Ultimately, farms might have to be merged into larger production units. It can only get more difficult to maintain 100 year old agrarian methods.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The government believes that when Vietnam sells its rice, the price of Thai rice will automatically rise. It hopes to eventually impose a trading set-up in the world market in the same way Opec sets oil prices."

These people are hopelessly incompetent. And OPEC does not set oil prices.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No long term good can come from this scheme.The only way to survive moving forward is to increase efficiency and productivity from the farms. Ultimately, farms might have to be merged into larger production units. It can only get more difficult to maintain 100 year old agrarian methods.

Maybe you are right, but history proves, the old ways are the best ways.... Never cut off your culture to save face....... rolleyes.gifrolleyes.gifrolleyes.gifrolleyes.gifrolleyes.gif

Kilosierra..... Good luck Yingluck....... sick.gifsick.gifsick.gifsick.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The government believes that when Vietnam sells its rice, the price of Thai rice will automatically rise. It hopes to eventually impose a trading set-up in the world market in the same way Opec sets oil prices."

These people are hopelessly incompetent. And OPEC does not set oil prices.

OPEC is a cartel whose role is to set out production levels and control/stabilise oil prices ie:

'OPEC is a body of mostly middle eastern countries that set prices for oil they sell and how much they will produce. This is the number one cause of price rises in foreign oil'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No long term good can come from this scheme.The only way to survive moving forward is to increase efficiency and productivity from the farms. Ultimately, farms might have to be merged into larger production units. It can only get more difficult to maintain 100 year old agrarian methods.

Maybe you are right, but history proves, the old ways are the best ways.... Never cut off your culture to save face....... rolleyes.gifrolleyes.gifrolleyes.gifrolleyes.gifrolleyes.gif

Kilosierra..... Good luck Yingluck....... sick.gifsick.gifsick.gifsick.gif

Well in my country years ago we used to send small boys and girls up chimneys to sweep them and about a hundred years before that we used to populate Australia by exporting criminals.

Is that the sort of thing you mean? whistling.gifwhistling.gif

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My wife has 5 rai of Hom Mali rice, how do we get on the bandwagon? Never mind, Takki said that in 3 years time he would control the world's rice market so Thailand will make a fortune in the future! cheesy.gifclap2.gifcheesy.gifclap2.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He claimed that the BAAC was politicising the subsidy scheme because the bank's top managers were appointed by Democrat Party.

"The bank claimed that it ran out of budget for the price subsidy project. [but] if the budget had gone, the bank should ask for such financial support from the Finance Ministry," Chalerm said. He said the bank officials involved should be identified.

How dare they complain, must be Democrats linked. On the other hand, BAAC asked for additional funds and received THB 92 billion from the government.

Open mouth, insert foot ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OPEC is a cartel whose role is to set out production levels and control/stabilise oil prices ie:

'OPEC is a body of mostly middle eastern countries that set prices for oil they sell and how much they will produce. This is the number one cause of price rises in foreign oil'.

OPEC would certainly like to believe this fantasy. I wonder what the number one cause of price falls in foreign oil is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OPEC is a cartel whose role is to set out production levels and control/stabilise oil prices ie:

'OPEC is a body of mostly middle eastern countries that set prices for oil they sell and how much they will produce. This is the number one cause of price rises in foreign oil'.

OPEC would certainly like to believe this fantasy. I wonder what the number one cause of price falls in foreign oil is?

Over supply when the demand is not there - usually on account of OPEC misjudging the situation by over producing when there are not enough buyers there, causing the price to fall!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...